News related to
prices

Global oil consumption has shifted, with demand now peaking in the third quarter instead of the traditional fourth, signalling a structural change reshaping markets during the summer months. Analysts point to stronger consumption from Asia—particularly China and India—alongside diminished heating fuel use in advanced economies as key drivers behind this trend, which carries significant implications for trading patterns, strategic reserves and pricing dynamics.

Industry data show that consumption of heating oil and kerosene in wealthy nations has declined steadily. In the US, fewer households rely on refined petroleum for heating—dropping from 17 % in 1990 to just 9 % today—while Europe has seen even steeper falls. Conversely, jet fuel use during Northern Hemisphere summers has grown, especially as holiday travel resumes. This has pushed demand peaks into July–September, reversing a long-standing seasonal rhythm.

Fuel consumption patterns in emerging economies present a stark contrast. Many countries, including those closer to the equator, rely on oil year-round for industrial power, electricity generation, and water desalination. Saudi Arabia, for instance, burned over 800,000 barrels per day of crude in just one summer to power air conditioning—a volume comparable to Belgium’s entire daily petroleum demand.

Climate change compounds the shift. Milder winters reduce heating demand, while hotter summers elevate energy needs for cooling and travel. In 2025 so far, global oil consumption in the third quarter is projected to exceed fourth-quarter levels by approximately 500,000 barrels per day—the fifth recorded year this has happened since 1991.

This transformation carries consequences for market tightness and pricing. Although OPEC+ and rising non‑OPEC output have attempted to balance supply, physical markets appear increasingly tight during summer months. In mid-July, Brent crude hovered in the mid‑US$60s, reflecting supply constraints despite softening from spring lows. Speculative traders, noting robust seasonal demand, have also increased their net long positions in Brent and gasoil contracts.

Asia’s role has been pivotal. China ramped refinery runs to over 80 % of capacity in June—the highest levels in five years—as stockpiling alongside consumption drove strong throughput. Meanwhile, Asia’s crude imports rose by around 510,000 bpd in the first half of 2025, underscoring the region’s impact. Despite cautious forecasts from the IEA and OPEC—projecting crude demand growth of 700,000 bpd and 1.29 million bpd respectively—actual refinery intake and imports suggest potential underestimation.

India’s fuel consumption trends provide further insights. June data from the Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell show fuel demand was 20.31 million tonnes—down 4.7 % from May but up 1.9 % year-on-year—reflecting monsoon-related dips typical through August and September. Diesel usage, especially linked to industry and logistics, is a key part of India’s expanding consumption profile.

OPEC+ has responded to these dynamics. In August, the alliance approved production increases of roughly 548,000 bpd aiming to satisfy peak Q3 demand. Simultaneously, US shale output remains robust; American producers reported nearly 13.5 million bpd in April, although well completion rates have slowed, reflecting the dependency on prices.

Nevertheless, the market outlook grows more uncertain as it heads into fourth quarter. The EIA forecasts OECD inventories will build to 62 days’ worth of supply in the second half of 2025—rising further to 66 days by end-2026—signalling a potential surplus as summer demand wanes. EIA projections for 2026 also expect US production to decline, with WTI prices retreating toward US$53 per barrel.

Pricing reflects this shift. Oil markets have shown summer tightness in 2025, but expectations for a Q4 surplus weigh on medium-term prices. The IEA forecasts refinery throughput will drop from a projected August peak of 85.4 million bpd to about 81.7 million bpd by October, implying weaker demand later in the year.

The shift in seasonality thus becomes a critical market pivot. Traders, refiners and producers must recalibrate strategies around production schedules, storage cycles and investment decisions. Q3 now demands heightened vigilance—from physical balancing to hedging strategies—while Q4 may require reassessment of storage utilisation and pricing risk.

Titan Company has struck a deal to acquire a 67% stake in Dubai-headquartered luxury jeweller Damas from Qatar-based Mannai Corporation in a transaction valued at 1.04 billion dirhams, or approximately $283.2 million. The move is poised to significantly strengthen Titan’s footprint in the Gulf region, positioning the Tata Group company among the largest subcontinent-origin jewellery players operating in the Middle East.

The acquisition agreement, announced on Monday, marks a pivotal expansion for Titan beyond its current presence in the UAE, where it has operated under the Tanishq brand since October 2020. The transaction is expected to close by 31 January 2026, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. Titan will also retain an option to purchase the remaining 33% equity in Damas after 31 December 2029, effectively laying the groundwork for full ownership over time.

The deal will give Titan direct access to Damas’ well-established network of 146 outlets across the six Gulf Cooperation Council nations — United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, and Bahrain. With only seven Titan-operated Tanishq stores currently open in the region, the acquisition presents a strategic leap in scale, market share, and regional brand visibility for the Bengaluru-based jeweller.

Damas, founded in 1907, is one of the most recognisable names in the Middle East’s luxury jewellery market. It has developed a reputation for catering to the region’s taste for high-end gold and diamond jewellery, and is known for its broad in-house product range and partnerships with international luxury brands. Mannai Corporation, which has owned Damas since 2012, has been looking to streamline its portfolio, prompting the divestment.

For Titan, the acquisition offers both a fast-track into the premium Gulf retail market and an opportunity to accelerate synergies across procurement, branding, and customer experience. The company is expected to retain Damas’ brand identity and existing management structure, allowing the Dubai-based business to continue leveraging its established reputation while benefitting from Titan’s supply chain and operational expertise.

The Middle East has been a target market for Titan’s international ambitions, driven by the strong presence of the South Asian diaspora and a deep-rooted cultural affinity for gold. The GCC region’s jewellery market is estimated to be worth over $10 billion, with gold accounting for a large share of consumer demand. Analysts view Titan’s acquisition of Damas as a strategically sound move in an environment where cross-border consolidation is becoming increasingly common in luxury retail.

Titan has grown to become one of the most dominant jewellery retailers in South Asia through its flagship brand Tanishq, which is positioned as an accessible luxury label offering a blend of traditional and contemporary designs. The company also operates sub-brands such as Mia and Zoya, each catering to specific consumer segments. Over the past decade, Titan has expanded into new domestic categories and entered select global markets, but the Damas deal marks its most ambitious international push yet.

The acquisition is being viewed by market observers as a significant play within the broader Tata Group strategy of boosting global brand equity across consumer-facing businesses. Following the group’s international expansions in hospitality, automotive, and technology, Titan’s move consolidates Tata’s multi-sectoral presence in the Gulf and taps into a region with rising demand for premium lifestyle offerings.

Financial analysts have underscored the deal’s strategic value, citing Damas’ established customer base and premium positioning, which could drive faster break-even timelines than greenfield expansion. Furthermore, the GCC’s favourable demographic trends and consistent gold demand have added to investor optimism around the deal’s long-term prospects.

Despite geopolitical uncertainty and fluctuations in gold prices, jewellery retail in the Gulf continues to enjoy high volumes due to cultural norms and steady tourist inflows, especially in the UAE. Titan’s increased footprint through Damas will place it in a better position to cater not just to residents but also international shoppers across the region’s major commercial and tourist hubs.

Titan has confirmed that the acquisition will be funded through internal accruals and debt, with no equity dilution expected in the near term. The company’s board has approved the investment, and the transaction is aligned with its long-term capital allocation strategy.

Executives at Titan have expressed confidence in Damas’ future growth trajectory and have indicated that the company will invest further in marketing, store refurbishment, and digital initiatives to modernise the customer journey. Damas’ product portfolio, which includes bridal sets, heritage pieces, and limited-edition designs, will remain intact as Titan aims to preserve the local flavour while infusing global best practices.

Dubai’s real estate market achieved a landmark surge during the first half of 2025, with transactions climbing 26 per cent to 125,538 and total value reaching AED 431 billion—an increase of 25 per cent year‑on‑year. The performance underscores the emirate’s growing appeal to both local and international investors.

Investor activity gathered notable momentum, with approximately 94,700 individuals completing transactions worth AED 326 billion—39 per cent more than a year earlier. Of this group, 59,075 were first‑time investors, injecting AED 157 billion and marking both a growth in investor numbers and value. UAE residents constituted 45 per cent of this cohort, signalling effective measures to convert renters into homeowners.

Women also bolstered the market’s resilience, executing nearly 35,000 transactions worth AED 73.2 billion. Meanwhile, foreign investors led contributions at AED 228 billion, with Arab and GCC nationals contributing AED 28.4 billion and AED 22.6 billion respectively.

Residential and luxury segments showed marked performance. Al Barsha South Fourth recorded the highest transaction volume, followed by Al Yalayis 1 and Wadi Al Safa 5. In terms of value, Dubai Marina topped the list with AED 25.1 billion, followed by Business Bay, Burj Khalifa zone, and Palm Jumeirah.

ValuStrat’s H1 property index reported that unbuilt villas now command values 66 per cent above their 2014 peaks and 175 per cent above post‑pandemic levels. Apartment prices rose 1.1 per cent month‑on‑month, translating to annual growth of 20 per cent, notably in The Greens, Dubai Silicon Oasis, Dubailand Residence Complex, Palm Jumeirah, and Town Square—all exhibiting capital gains of over 22 per cent.

Parallel to sales growth, rental price inflation decelerated mid‑year: by May, annual residential rent increase eased to 8.5 per cent from 14.3 per cent in January. Cavendish Maxwell attributed this moderation to the delivery of approximately 9,300 new units in Q1 and the introduction of the “New Smart Rental Index,” which is influencing both landlord expectations and market dynamics.

Mortgage activity reflected evolving buyer preferences. Data from DXB Interact indicates a 38 per cent rise in loan volume, although total mortgage value dipped by 8 per cent—signalling a shift towards cash purchases or smaller financing commitments. Off‑plan sales stood strong at 64,907 transactions, with a total value of AED 209.1 billion. Resale transactions numbered 34,150, valued at AED 119.7 billion.

Amid this buoyancy, caution flags exist. Fitch Ratings warns of potential double‑digit price corrections—up to 15 per cent—in late 2025 and 2026, due to an expected supply surge of around 210,000 units. The agency nevertheless noted that banks and developers have reduced exposure and are poised to manage potential adjustments.

Planning authorities have responded proactively. Dubai intends to add 73,000 homes in 2025, targeting a total of 300,000 new units by 2028—efforts aimed at aligning supply with investor momentum and population growth. Meanwhile, ongoing state‑led consolidation of developers, regulatory improvements under the Economic Agenda D33, and the Dubai Real Estate Strategy 2033 continue to underpin structural confidence.

As forecasted by ValuStrat, property price growth may moderate but remain positive—potentially adding another 10 per cent by the end of 2025 as market dynamics evolve. The challenge now lies in balancing supply expansion, evolving mortgage behaviour, and price stability to sustain long‑term viability for investors and residents alike.

Foreign institutional investor activity has slowed, but India’s equity market is gaining a new level of sophistication thanks to the rapid emergence of long‑short strategies among domestic analysts. With regulatory approval of the Specialised Investment Fund route and increasing recognition of sell‑side research, analysts in India are setting new standards, outperforming peers in major global markets.

At the centre of this shift are flagship long‑short funds, enabled by an April amendment that allowed mutual funds to engage in both long and short equity positions via the SIF framework. Industry leaders such as ICICI Prudential, SBI, Quant and ITI Mutual Funds are among the first to roll out these products. This structural innovation, viewed by asset managers as a game‑changer, allows strategic hedging and enhanced alpha generation in volatile conditions.

Jatinder Pal Singh, CEO of ITI Mutual Fund, identifies the move as a watershed moment: “We see a lot of potential in this category similar to what we have seen in alternative investment funds…”. Quantitative and hedge fund entrants—AlphaGrep, Abakkus and Carnelian—are also applying for SIF licences, signalling a rising tide of systematic strategies.

The surge in long-short offerings emerges against a backdrop of changing investor sentiment and derivative market structures. While proprietary traders and retail continue to dominate derivatives trading—accounting for 52.3% and 33.6% respectively—domestic institutional participation remains minimal at just 0.2%. The launch of these funds is expected to usher in broader institutional adoption, reducing reliance on speculative flows.

Simultaneously, foreign players are reassessing their exposure. Citigroup downgraded Indian equities to “neutral” citing stretched valuations and slower earnings growth. Bank of America has flagged valuation concerns as part of seven headwinds to near‑term market performance, though it remains bullish on India’s long‑run structural strengths. Morgan Stanley echoes this optimism, describing the market as undervalued and promising for patient investors.

At the nexus of these developments, sell‑side analysts play a pivotal role. Their long‑short models provide more nuanced insights, enabling differentiated strategies compared to conventional long‑only approaches. This evolution mirrors practices in advanced markets, where close analyst coverage is integral to informed decision‑making.

International observers are taking note. Carson Block, known for his critical research into Chinese markets, is considering launching a long‑short or long‑only fund in India, citing opportunities in corporate transparency and leveraging tax-friendly jurisdictions like GIFT City. His interest signals growing confidence in the depth and potential of India’s equity ecosystem.

The broader equities landscape reflects these shifts. Foreign institutional investors are ramping up bearish positions in derivatives, signalling caution amid valuation concerns and global uncertainties. Concurrently, new equity supply is expanding, with a surge in IPOs and share sales reflecting a 14% rise in benchmark indices over the preceding six months. Analysts warn that without strong institutional demand, this wave may trigger volatility.

Experts argue the timing could not be better for long‑short funds. As valuations plateau and geopolitical uncertainty remains — including Middle East tensions affecting crude prices — the ability to manage risk through hedging becomes decisive. Fund managers are betting that structured strategies will better manage these headwinds.

At the same time, India’s growing affluent class—from double‑digit income growth to rising equity allocation—adds tailwinds. Wealth managers like 360 One are expanding advisory services amid rising assets under management, reflecting the country’s broader push toward financial sophistication. The development of long‑short funds aligns with these trends, offering differentiated solutions to high‑net‑worth investors seeking yield in uncertain markets.

Yet challenges remain. Institutional engagement in derivatives must scale meaningfully to support product viability. Regulators and market infrastructure will need to adapt, ensuring transparency and risk‑management frameworks keep pace. Moreover, investor education is critical; long‑short strategies are complex and require a clear understanding of leverage, margin risk and counterparty exposures.

Nonetheless, the direction is clear: Indian equity markets are transitioning from conventional long‑only investing to embrace multi‑directional strategies, leveraging deep local research and structural innovation. With the SIF framework opening doors for long‑short funds, analysts are stepping into roles once reserved for global peers. As Citi tones down enthusiasm and global investors tread cautiously, India’s analysts are sharpening tools that could redefine the domestic landscape—and perhaps export this model abroad.

Saudi Aramco is in advanced discussions with a consortium spearheaded by BlackRock to secure approximately $10 billion for infrastructure linked to its expansive Jafurah gas initiative. The financing structure echoes prior deals, with investors purchasing usage rights while Aramco retains operational control and ownership.

The proposed transaction centres on critical assets—specifically pipelines and a processing facility—essential to the $100 billion Jafurah project, the world’s largest shale gas development outside the United States. Aramco aims to lift gas output by 60 per cent by 2030 from 2021 levels.

This initiative represents another strategic approach by Gulf oil majors to diversify their revenue models amid volatile crude prices. The deal allows Aramco to tap private capital while offering investors stable tariff income backed by long‑term usage commitments.

In 2021, BlackRock and EIG invested in Aramco’s gas and oil pipeline subsidiaries through similar lease‑back transactions, collectively raising nearly $28 billion. Under those agreements, Aramco retained a 51 per cent stake in each entity and paid tariffs to investors for pipeline usage, a structure described by consultancy Qamar Energy as more akin to borrowing than a sale.

With this new deal, Aramco continues its disciplined approach to infrastructure financing. The Jafurah project itself is a linchpin of Saudi Arabia’s energy transition agenda, aligning with national objectives to bolster gas production and reduce reliance on oil exports.

While those familiar with the talks confirm the structure mirrors the 2021 transactions, the group declined to specify a timeline for finalisation. Both Aramco and BlackRock declined to comment.

Experts note that such arrangements enable Aramco to free up capital for diversification ventures while retaining strategic infrastructure oversight. “The pipeline deals were basically a securitisation,” said Robin Mills, chief executive of Qamar Energy, referencing the 2021 transactions.

Market analysts believe this deal could serve as a template for financing future segments of Jafurah, which is expected to reach production of 2 billion cubic feet per day by 2030.

Taken together with Aramco’s earlier asset sales—such as its consideration of offloading gas-fired power plants and port infrastructure—these moves reflect mounting government pressure to boost proceeds amid a fiscal deficit and fluctuating oil revenues.

Saudi Arabia’s reliance on oil revenues—which accounted for around 62 percent of state income in 2024—has prompted a series of asset realisations, bond issuances and structured financing to support large-scale domestic projects and broaden the economic base.

The Jafurah deal also highlights growing investor appetite for stable, long‑dated infrastructure revenue streams in the Gulf. With institutional players like BlackRock involved, these deals are gaining traction as a viable alternative to traditional equity or debt-financing routes. Analysts suggest more such partnerships could emerge as the kingdom scales up energy-reform initiatives, including clean energy and non-oil sectors.

As the deal progresses, stakeholders will monitor its structure, particularly in comparison with the 2021 models, and assess implications for Aramco’s capital allocation strategy. The outcome could influence both market perception of the firm and broader investment flows into Middle East energy infrastructure.

Dubai has climbed to seventh place worldwide among the most expensive cities for high-net-worth individuals, according to Julius Baer’s Global Wealth and Lifestyle Report 2025, up from 12th last year. This marks the largest ascent within Europe, the Middle East and Africa, even though local currency prices rose by just 1 per cent.

The report evaluates the cost of living for HNWIs using a “Lifestyle Index” that covers 20 goods and services ranging from property and cars to legal services and education. In Dubai, steep increases in big-ticket sectors—13 per cent for car prices and 17 per cent for residential property—have driven the city’s rise in rankings, reinforcing its appeal to affluent migrants.

Regionally, EMEA now accounts for over half of the top ten most expensive cities for HNWIs. London, Monaco and Zurich also climbed the rankings, securing second, fourth and fifth positions globally. Dubai’s dramatic move to seventh place complements these traditional wealth centres, overtaking cities such as Shanghai and New York.

Globally, Singapore remains the costliest city for wealthy lifestyles, with London and Hong Kong following in second and third place. While overall prices in US dollar terms fell by 2 per cent—driven by a 3.4 per cent decline in the cost of goods—Dubai defied this trend with its sharp price hikes in luxury property and automotive sectors.

Dubai’s real estate sector experienced exceptional growth in 2024, with property sales value surging by 27 per cent year-on-year. Concurrently, the number of millionaires in the emirate more than doubled over the past decade, now exceeding 80,000, accompanied by a rise in centi-millionaires and billionaires.

Julius Baer attributes this shift to the emirate’s strategic appeal to mobile elites via residency schemes, minimal personal taxation and a vibrant lifestyle combining beachfront living, upscale services and robust business potential. Luxury dining, designer fashion, fine jewellery and experiential spending remain in high demand, even as global consumption for goods softens.

Beyond wealth rankings, the report highlights evolving HNWI priorities, with growing emphasis on both physical and financial longevity. Across regions, including Asia and North America, wealthy individuals are increasingly investing in wellness, advanced healthcare and long-term wealth preservation.

As Dubai solidifies its position among global wealth hubs, analysts expect its progressive trajectory to continue. Julius Baer suggests that it may soon challenge top-tier cities like Singapore or London if growth in luxury sectors and affluent residency persists.

Despite global economic headwinds—such as trade tensions, slowing consumption and geopolitical uncertainties—the emirate’s ability to attract HNWIs has remained strong, positioning it as a dominant destination for global mobility and wealth settlement.

Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Investment Company, Partners Group, GIC and TPG Rise Climate have agreed a €6.7 billion deal to acquire Techem, the Frankfurt-based energy‑efficiency firm, in a strategic move poised to reinforce digital-first submetering and sustainability in European real estate.

The transaction—set to conclude in the second half of 2025, pending regulatory approvals—will see Partners Group’s infrastructure arm retain a controlling stake, while Mubadala, GIC and TPG Rise Climate take minority positions alongside, marking a rotation in ownership strategy. The sale ends the tenure of the prior consortium including La Caisse and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which supported Techem since 2018.

Techem, founded in 1952 and based in Eschborn, operates in 18 countries and serves more than 440,000 customers with over 13 million dwellings under its care. Approximately 62 million devices are currently installed across its footprint.

Under Partners Group’s 2018 private equity-led acquisition, Techem grew its sales beyond €1 billion and increased EBITDA by nearly 50%. This expansion solidified its role as a leading provider of submetering services—a crucial component in the decarbonisation of real estate, a sector responsible for around 40% of global CO₂ emissions.

The new ownership strategy aims to deepen digital integration, expand offerings to include smart meters, and capitalise on evolving regulations, rising energy prices and corporate net-zero commitments. “Techem is at the forefront of energy services and is uniquely positioned to drive energy efficiency within the real estate sector,” noted Boon Chin Hau, CIO of GIC Infrastructure, underscoring the group’s confidence in Techem’s strategic outlook.

Abdulla Mohamed Shadid, Head of Energy and Sustainability at Mubadala’s private equity platform, emphasised the importance of helping find solutions to global challenges, reflecting the company’s ongoing shift toward purpose-driven capital deployment. Implementation will include further digitalisation of operations and service expansions tailored to improve building efficiency.

This deal, valued at €6.7 billion, ranks among the year’s largest private‑market transactions globally.

Techem’s technology deploys submetering for heating and water, enabling accurate billing and encouraging lower consumption. Their low‑investment, non‑invasive approach aligns well with landlords and property owners seeking cost-effective energy solutions. Trends in European regulation and growing pressure on emissions reduction give the firm a favourable market tailwind—a factor the new consortium appears ready to exploit.

Despite an earlier attempt by TPG to buy out Techem independently in October 2024, that bid fell through after EU antitrust scrutiny. The current agreement reflects a more collaborative structure that shares risk and maintains continuity under infrastructure stewardship.

Commenting on continuity, Techem’s CEO Matthias Hartmann stated that the company’s strategic direction would remain unchanged, emphasising a steady course under the incoming partners.

The transaction parallels broader investment patterns in smart‑energy firms. Over the past year, GIC has partnered with investors such as EQT to acquire UK smart‑meter provider Calisen—a sign of growing interest in climate‑aligned infrastructure.

With assets under management spanning global private markets, Partners Group leads the infrastructure side with over US$27 billion, while Mubadala and GIC bring sovereign-backed financial clout, and TPG Rise Climate adds dedicated impact‑investment expertise; together they form a powerful alliance geared towards scaling energy efficiency across European real estate.

A growing number of market analysts predict Ruvi AI’s RUVI token will outperform speculative memecoins like Shiba Inu in the forthcoming crypto bull cycle. They highlight RUVI’s audited smart contracts, real-world AI and blockchain utility, robust presale metrics, and VIP incentives as evidence of its potential to deliver returns far beyond meme-driven tokens.

RUVI recently secured an independent audit from CyberScope, addressing smart-contract vulnerabilities and enhancing investor confidence. The project has also onboarded WEEX Exchange to ensure post-presale liquidity, further bolstering trust among institutional and retail backers. With $2.2–$2.3 million raised and approximately 180–185 million tokens sold to over 2,100 holders in Phase 2, analysts suggest the foundation has been laid for a significant market debut.

RUVI’s utility-first design distinguishes it from memecoins. Integrated AI tools aim to improve marketing campaign efficacy, while blockchain-secured payments support content creators. In finance, the token underpins fraud detection and cross-border payment services. This multifaceted approach suggests sustained demand beyond speculative interest.

Analysts anticipate an increase from the presale price of $0.015 to $0.07 upon listing, yielding an initial ~5× gain. Post-listing projections place RUVI at $1—implying a 66× return from current prices. Some estimate upside reaching 13,500–13,800% over a full bull cycle—figures drawn by comparing RUVI to early-stage tokens like Ripple’s XRP and Cardano’s ADA.

RUVI’s VIP tiers amplify these potential gains. A $750 investment yields 70,000 tokens; a $2,100 stake offers 224,000 tokens; and a $9,600 commitment doubles token allocation with a 100% bonus. At a $1 valuation, these tiers could translate into $70,000, $224,000, and $1.28 million respectively.

Critics caution against early-stage token exuberance. They note reliance on bull market conditions and warn that memecoin popularity can surge unpredictably. Shiba Inu, though lacking intrinsic utility, has navigated volatile market cycles before. Sustainable success for RUVI will depend on seamless platform deployment, AI adoption across industries, and execution of its roadmap.

That said, analysts emphasise RUVI’s structured growth path—completed audits, exchange partnerships, utility-based ecosystem—and contrast it with the hype-centric nature of memecoins. Drawing parallels with Ripple’s early journey, they see RUVI carving out a role among next-gen crypto major players.

As global attention shifts from memecoins to purpose-built crypto infrastructure, RUVI is gaining traction among sophisticated investors seeking risk-reward clarity. With its presale in full swing, the token’s performance will show whether the project can translate early promise into lasting market impact.

Oil traded in a narrow range as tariffs and sanctions threats unsettled global markets, weighing heavily on the outlook for energy demand. Brent hovered just above $70 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate stayed above $68. Futures markets weakened as U. S. equity-index futures dropped following fresh trade tensions between Washington and key global partners.

U. S. President Donald Trump escalated tariff threats, targeting both the European Union and Mexico with 30 per cent duties and flagging potential levies against Brazil, the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and others. Markets interpreted this as a risk to economic momentum, especially in energy‑sensitive regions of Asia, denting crude demand expectations. At the same time, Asian buyers adopted a cautious stance, amplifying downward pressure on oil.

Against this backdrop, investors are eyeing a scheduled “major statement” from President Trump concerning Russia. Anticipation of new sanctions against the country, a major oil producer, lent modest support to prices that might otherwise have fallen further. Still, this support was checked by rising output from OPEC+ and a pause in geopolitical flare-ups in the Middle East.

Data from the International Energy Agency signals that global oil markets remain relatively tight. Summer driving seasons and increased refinery activity have buoyed demand, although analysts note that elevated output from Saudi Arabia—above its OPEC+ quota—puts a dent in any sustained rally. The kingdom disputes claims of non‑compliance, stating marketed crude remains within agreed limits.

Market watchers also flag OPEC+ plans to hike production by approximately 548,000 barrels per day in August, potentially followed by another boost in September. ING warns these moves could put the market into surplus in the final quarter of 2025. Additionally, the group revised its global demand forecasts downward for 2026–29, citing weakening growth in China.

Further clouding the outlook, heightened tariff uncertainty is exerting macroeconomic drag. The IEA forecasts a meaningful drop in global oil consumption growth for 2025, down a third from earlier projections, due in part to Trump’s tariff measures. Analysts stress that inflationary pressures and slower global trade would dampen energy demand.

From a logistical standpoint, renewed Houthi tensions in the Red Sea have introduced another variable, interrupting shipping and supporting prices marginally. Still, Middle East volatility has largely receded compared with levels seen earlier this year.

Looking ahead, market players are set to digest a blend of geopolitical and macroeconomic signals. Key Chinese trade figures due soon may reveal shifts in demand. OPEC+ decisions on output will be scrutinised closely, as will the next moves in Washington’s trade and sanctions policy. Meanwhile, U. S. gasoline consumption remains robust, with the Energy Information Administration reporting a 6 per cent increase to 9.2 million barrels per day—signalling that underlying demand has not yet faltered.

Oil markets are caught between supportive fundamentals—such as strong summer demand, supply constraints from Russia and geopolitical flare‑ups—and sobering headwinds from proposed tariffs, elevated output and macroeconomic uncertainty. Traders remain cautious, awaiting concrete policy developments from Washington, data releases from China, and steps by OPEC+ to navigate a market landscape that is anything but stable.

Oil prices have shifted sharply this week, with demand forecasts now under pressure from escalating trade tensions fuelled by fresh tariffs. Brent crude is trading in the high‑60s per barrel, while benchmark WTI hovers around mid‑60s, reflecting growing investor caution. Analysts point to revised supply and demand projections as indicators of a changing market landscape.

An International Energy Agency monthly report has cut its global oil‑demand growth forecast for 2025 to 700,000 bpd, the slowest pace since 2009 outside the pandemic, down from 720,000 bpd last month. The downgrade reflects weaker consumption in emerging markets and a cooling US‑China trade outlook. Supply continues to outpace demand as OPEC+ ramps up production; global output in June rose by about 950,000 bpd to reach 105.6 mbpd.

The IEA notes the oil market remains technically in surplus, with inventories building globally—even as regional stock draws persist. Oil runs at refineries have slowed, particularly in the US and China, enabling downward revisions in demand projections. Enverus Intelligence Research offers a counter‑view, pointing to balanced OECD inventories and sustained summer demand north of 1 mbpd, which may support higher prices.

The US Energy Information Administration expects US crude oil production to plateau at roughly 13.4 mbpd in 2025, dropping modestly later this year as lower prices curb drilling activity. Despite this, producers remain vulnerable to profit erosion unless prices stabilise in the $65–70 range.

President Trump’s trade moves have reignited fears of another global trade war, with new tariff letters dispatched to Brazil, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and others this week. Threats of 50% duties on exports such as copper, semiconductor components and auto parts are weighing heavily on commodity‑linked equity markets and raising recession risk concerns. Oil prices dropped more than 2% on Thursday as benchmark futures responded to the potential hit to economic growth.

While some market participants remain in “wait‑and‑see” mode, given Trump’s unpredictability and history of policy reversals, the overarching effect is to dampen demand forecasts. Onyx Capital’s head of research, Harry Tchilinguirian, cautions against overreaction but acknowledges that tariffs are adding to inflationary pressures and may reinforce Federal Reserve caution.

Geopolitical flashpoints in the Middle East continue to influence sentiment. Oil surged in June as Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, which handles almost 20% of world oil shipments, but prices eased once the waterway remained open. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia raised official prices to consumers, citing strong demand in China’s post‑pandemic recovery, though refiners are reporting margin squeezes.

Financial institutions have started to reflect this shifting environment in their projections. A Reuters‑polled group of 40 analysts revised Brent average forecasts for 2025 to $67.86 per barrel—up marginally from May—while predicting demand growth of only around 730,000 bpd. JP Morgan cut its annual Brent estimate to $66, citing rising OPEC+ output and sluggish consumption. TD Economics trimmed its forecast further, expecting 2025 WTI to average near $62, warning of sustained downward pressure from trade risk and oversupply.

Two factors loom large over the coming months. First, the path of trade tensions: further tariff escalations or retaliatory actions could erode industrial activity and fuel sales. Second, OPEC+ strategy: with the bloc unconstrained in raising output, additional production could overwhelm tepid demand, pushing prices below current levels. The IEA projects supply growth for 2025 at 2.1 mbpd, while demand is seen rising just 700 kbpd.

On the financial front, hedge fund positioning has turned cautious, registering the sharpest drop in bullish sentiment since February. Traders are forecasting narrower price ranges ahead, with elevated volatility as tariff developments hit market headlines.

Forward‑looking forecasts remain mixed. EIA projects Brent to average $68.89 in 2025 and $58.48 in 2026, marking a seasonal decline. Enverus suggests the upside remains intact if demand holds steady, especially with summer driving season underway. Market watchers also note that rising gas‑to‑oil switching costs, refinery restarts and diminished spare capacity could temper price declines.

China’s consumption is also under scrutiny. While Beijing seeks to stimulate growth through fiscal and monetary tools, investor sentiment remains fragile. Saudi’s decision to push prices higher was based on perceived strengthening in Chinese demand, but many analysts caution that any slow‑down could rapidly tip the balance.

Emerging long‑term trends offer some balance. IEA’s long‑term outlook suggests oil demand will continue rising through the late 2020s, driven by non‑OECD economies and slower clean‑energy adoption, delaying peak demand beyond 2030. Nonetheless, short‑term price direction seems firmly tied to macroeconomic risks and geopolitical dynamics.