News related to
trade

Senior officials from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have defended the August production boost of 548,000 barrels per day, stating that global markets are absorbing the extra supply without piling up inventories. UAE Energy Minister Suhail al‑Mazrouei told delegates in Vienna that inventories have remained stable despite the accelerated output increases, reflecting genuine consumption growth. Kuwait Petroleum Corp. echoed this view, with its CEO Sheikh Nawaf Al‑Sabah noting strong demand from Asian customers and signalling a tighter market than widely perceived.

Oil markets displayed resilience as Brent crude climbed above $70 a barrel, recovering from an initial dip following the OPEC+ announcement. Analysts cite robust summer travel demand, Middle East geopolitical strains—such as intermittent Houthi attacks in the Red Sea—and tighter fuel product cracks as underpinning near‑term market firmness. The supply surge, although substantial, has not yet triggered signs of oversupply. OECD stock levels remain flat, while US Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels stay well below maximum, pointing to a balanced market setup and sustained product demand.

The OPEC+ decision marks an acceleration of a reversal programme that began in April with a modest 138,000 bpd increase, followed by three successive monthly hikes of 411,000 bpd. The latest announcement represents a strategic shift: rather than merely unwinding voluntary cuts, producers are intent on reclaiming market share and anchoring long-term stability. Saudi Arabia, which had shouldered most of the original production curbs, is now pushing ahead to restore output levels much faster than previously scheduled.

UAE officials emphasise fundamentals over headlines, asserting that additional barrels were essential to maintain equilibrium rather than depress prices. “We haven’t seen a major buildup in inventories, which means the market needed those barrels,” al‑Mazrouei said, stressing the need for steady investment in oil infrastructure. Kuwait’s Sheikh Nawaf further highlighted sustained demand growth—particularly in Asia—estimating additional global need of up to 1.3 million bpd over the year and pointing to record-high shipments from his country in June.

Supporting evidence emerges in price trend analysis. Despite the supply increase, Brent crude closed near $69–$70 per barrel, with West Texas Intermediate at approximately $68. Reuters reported a 1 per cent rise in oil prices shortly after the announcement, driven by stronger-than-expected demand signals and a dip in US production projections. Market commentary suggests that the anticipated supply surplus may not materialise until later in the year, allowing current price support to persist.

However, concern is building among forecasters regarding the risk of supply outpacing demand in the months ahead. Analysts at ING and Bloomberg caution that cumulative increases—including a potential similar rise in September—could tilt the market towards surplus by winter. Goldman Sachs predicts Brent could drop to an average of $59 in the fourth quarter if these trendlines hold. Such projections underscore the delicate balance between stabilising markets today and sowing the seeds of tomorrow’s oversupply.

Geopolitical factors continue to sway market sentiment. Renewed attacks by Houthi forces on shipping lanes in the Red Sea have boosted risk premiums and contributed to diverging regional price dynamics. In conjunction with potential US tariffs on trade partners, these developments inject layers of complexity into demand forecasts and shipping routes. Meanwhile, softer oil output projections from US shale producers, prompted by lower prices this year, have lent additional upward momentum to benchmarks.

Central to OPEC+ strategy is ensuring investment resilience in producing countries. UAE highlighted underinvestment concerns, warning that deferred spending could undermine long-term supply stability. The August lift, they argue, responds to both short-term demand and the need to signal commitment to investors. Kuwait pointed to customer outreach as evidence of healthy demand and stressed its competitive edge in terms of low-cost, lower-carbon intensity oil—a differentiator in markets such as China, Japan and South Korea.

Market analysts remain split on the outlook. Enverus Intelligence Research recently contended that prevailing data does not support a bearish narrative, noting flat stock levels in OECD countries, strong seasonal consumption, and resilient cracks. By contrast, energy consultancy FGE flagged the limitations of ramping up production, citing member compliance and infrastructure constraints that may prevent full implementation of quotas—particularly in Iraq and Kazakhstan.

Suhail bin Mohammed Al Mazrouei, Minister of Energy and Infrastructure, reaffirmed the UAE’s full backing for OPEC+ mechanisms, underlining the nation’s commitment to sustaining equilibrium in global oil markets through capacity expansion and coordinated policy.

At the 9th OPEC International Seminar in Vienna on 9 July, Al Mazrouei praised OPEC+ for its collective decision‑making model, which he said ensures production responds to actual market demand rather than price speculation. He noted that the UAE’s strategic investments in expanding production capacity reflect a readiness to release additional oil when consumption trends warrant, providing a stabilising buffer to global supply. The minister highlighted that this expansion aligns with prudent leadership foresight aimed at reinforcing market resilience.

He emphasised that there has been no substantial rise in inventories despite several months of gradual production increases. “Even with the increases…we haven’t seen a major buildup in inventories, which means the market needed those barrels,” he stated. This observation supports broader OPEC+ data showing that successive monthly output increments have been absorbed by demand, a trend that the UAE believes underlines the rationality behind its expanded quota.

Since April, OPEC+ has reversed approximately 2.17 million barrels per day of voluntary output cuts via a phased rollout: 138,000 bpd in April, then 411,000 bpd in each of May, June and July, followed by a proposed 548,000 bpd increase for August – a move reflecting growing market confidence. Notably, the UAE is set to complete a 300,000 bpd quota increase by September, a benchmark reached ahead of the original 2026 timeline as OPEC+ expedited its capacity hike schedule.

Analysts suggest that such robust production gains could recover roughly 2.5 per cent of global demand by September. Al Mazrouei remarked that the UAE’s investments will strengthen its role within OPEC+ and that once additional capacity comes online, it will serve as a crucial stabilising factor during demand shifts.

He further argued that focusing solely on oil price levels is insufficient. Rather, OPEC+ aims to strike a sustainable balance that encourages long‑term investment. “We need the price to be right for investments to happen,” he said, warning of the consequences of underinvestment across producers.

Current market dynamics appear to confirm this approach: data from mid‑June and early July indicate that inventories across OECD nations remained stable despite the production uptick, confirming demand absorption remains robust. That observation, Al Mazrouei suggested, validates the pace of OPEC+ supply restoration and diminishes concern about a looming oversupply.

While output is increasing, policy is cautious. The Group of Eight core OPEC+ members—Saudi Arabia, Russia, UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, Kazakhstan and Algeria—are proceeding in measured increments. Al Mazrouei underscored that OPEC+ continues to meet monthly via ministerial and committee reviews, carefully calibrating production relative to shifting market fundamentals.

Beyond ensuring balance, the UAE’s production capacity expansion also carries strategic benefits. Having secured a higher individual quota, the country aims to restore and extend its market share. This reinforcement was acknowledged by external observers, including Richard Bronze of Energy Aspects, who noted “the UAE is benefiting from this speeding up of the quota increases” within a context of broader OPEC+ output acceleration.

Despite concerns about slowing economies in key importers, including China, and rising US trade tensions, OPEC+ retains a cautiously optimistic outlook. Prices in July experienced modest one‑per‑cent gains near $69 per barrel following the announcement of the August supply increase—an indicator that demand continues to absorb the additional volumes.

Nevertheless, OPEC+ remains vigilant about macroeconomic risks. Commentators have warned that demand softness later this year, driven by uncertainties in global growth and trade policies, could pressurise prices. Al Mazrouei echoed that view, stressing that short‑term supply increases must be accompanied by stable investment in oil infrastructure to prevent future shortages.

Persistent coordinated production strategy is a central theme from the Vienna seminar. Ministers emphasised OPEC+’s response to shifting fundamentals rather than geopolitical or speculative impulses. With the group moving to complete the unwind of emergency cuts, markets will closely monitor whether global demand continues to match supply advances.

Nvidia is set to begin production of a new, lower‑spec Blackwell‑architecture AI chip for the Chinese market as early as June, aimed at complying with US export controls while maintaining its presence in the nation’s booming data centre sector. Priced between $6,500 and $8,000—significantly cheaper than the $10,000–$12,000 H20—the chip trades performance for accessibility under current regulatory constraints.

The streamlined variant is based on the RTX Pro 6000D, utilising conventional GDDR7 memory instead of high‑bandwidth memory and eschewing TSMC’s advanced CoWoS packaging to stay within US‑mandated memory bandwidth limits of 1.7–1.8 TB/s. Industry analysts note this is markedly below the 4 TB/s capability of the H20.

Yet Nvidia is not stopping there. As part of a dual‑chip strategy, it is reportedly developing a second Blackwell model scheduled to enter production by September. The specifications remain undisclosed but are expected to similarly align with US export regulations.

China accounts for around 13 per cent of Nvidia’s revenue, a slice that has shrunk sharply from a pre‑2022 peak due to export restrictions, which caused market share to decline from roughly 95 per cent to near 50 per cent today. A ban on the H20 in April prompted the company to write off about $5.5 billion in inventory and forgo an estimated $15 billion in sales.

CEO Jensen Huang has acknowledged the company’s “limited” options, stating that until a compliant design is approved by US authorities, Nvidia remains locked out of China’s $50 billion data centre market. Without it, his comments suggest many customers may migrate to domestic alternatives like Huawei’s Ascend 910B.

Domestic competition in China has intensified. Huawei’s Ascend 910B and others have gained momentum, closing the gap to Nvidia’s downgraded models within one to two years, according to semiconductor analysts. Nvidia counters this with its CUDA programming ecosystem — a key competitive advantage. With CUDA deeply integrated into AI development workflows globally, it may anchor developer loyalty even as hardware capabilities shift.

Further complicating the picture are whispers of a third chip internally known as “B30” or “B40”, which appears designed to operate in clusters and align with new export rules by focusing restrictions on individual chip rather than entire systems. Reports indicate interest from China’s leading tech companies—ByteDance, Alibaba and Tencent—with ambitions to produce more than 1 million units this year. Nvidia has not directly confirmed the chip, and one Chinese supplier, ZJK Industrial, briefly announced production ramp‑up for the B40 before retracting the statement, triggering increased market speculation.

US officials have shown concern that widespread availability of such chips—even within controlled clusters—could bolster China’s capabilities in foundational model training and inference tasks. Commerce Department Under‑Secretary Jeffrey Kessler recently told lawmakers that AI chip smuggling “is happening”, echoing longstanding export fears. Nvidia’s Huang maintains there is “no evidence” of diversion, but a consistent black‑market narrative continues to shadow the sector.

Chinese firms have outlined plans to deploy thousands of H100 and H200 chips in new data centres, particularly in western provinces such as Xinjiang and Qinghai, where abundant renewable power and cool climates offer logistical advantages. Target installations indicate upwards of 115,000 such processors in aggregated plans—most of which remain aspirational due to export prohibitions and logistical challenges.

Analysts suggest that while Nvidia’s tiered Blackwell chips may temporarily appease China’s AI infrastructure demands, the deeper impact will depend on regulatory outcomes and the strength of the CUDA ecosystem. If export restrictions ease, Nvidia stands to regain momentum; if they tighten, domestic chipmakers like Huawei will likely secure a larger foothold.

This unfolding scenario underscores a shift in semiconductor geopolitics: global tech leaders are adapting designs to fragmented access zones while local players race to fill the vacuum. The episode illustrates how export policy, market demand and strategic software assets intersect in shaping tomorrow’s AI hardware landscape.

Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security has issued a strong and authoritative rebuttal to claims circulating that the United Arab Emirates is offering lifetime Golden Visas to certain nationalities. In its statement on 8 July, ICP emphasised that Golden Visa eligibility is strictly governed by existing laws, ministerial decisions, and official regulations. Applications are processed only via UAE government channels—no consultancy firm, internal or external, has legitimate authority to promise visa grants under simplified conditions.

The statement was prompted by alleged press releases from a foreign consultancy office claiming applicants could secure lifetime Golden Visas for all categories from abroad. ICP characterised these claims as legally baseless and made without coordination with UAE authorities. Following these claims, several Indian and UAE-based outlets reportedly published the information before the ICP clarified its position.

While ICP refrains from naming the specific consultancy, it has warned of impending legal action against entities using false promises to extract money from individuals seeking long-term residency in the UAE. “Entities spreading such false information [are] exploiting [people’s] hopes for a dignified life,” the authority stated. It urged the public to verify procedures through official sources, including its website and app, or by contacting the designated call centre at 600522222.

The ICP insisted that the Golden Visa framework remains unchanged: eligibility criteria, procedural regulations, and visa categories continue to be defined by UAE law and ministerial orders alone. The visa remains accessible only to those meeting these statutory provisions, and all processes must follow the established, government-operated digital platforms.

This response comes amid a broader pattern of misinformation regarding Golden Visa eligibility. Earlier this month, another wave of misleading reports claimed investors in digital currencies—particularly in Toncoin—had qualified for a ten-year Golden Visa by staking cryptocurrency. In response, ICP, alongside the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, issued a joint statement rejecting those claims and reminded the public that cryptocurrency investment is not a recognised category for Golden Visa issuance.

Under the official programme, Golden Visa eligibility remains targeted to specific categories: real-estate investors, entrepreneurs, exceptional talents, qualified professionals, scientists and researchers, high-performing graduates and students, frontline workers, humanitarian pioneers, and notable maritime asset holders. The ICP reaffirmed that these criteria are set in accordance with legal frameworks and are unchanged by the rumours.

Despite the cross-border spread of misinformation, UAE authorities appear resolute in their commitment to transparency, integrity, and regulatory enforcement. The ICP has stated that all application processes must occur through official digital services, and only those platforms bear the authority to collect fees or accept documentation. Third-party entities claiming to facilitate visa applications risk legal consequences.

Experts underscore the potential fallout from such false claims. “Misleading promises fuel public confusion and pose reputational risks for the UAE’s visa systems,” noted one legal analyst based in Dubai, requesting anonymity. Misinformation casts doubt on the authenticity of the Golden Visa programme and could encourage fraud. UAE authorities increasingly rely on legal measures and public advisories to counteract false narratives.

The timing of this clarification aligns with heightened international interest in UAE residency schemes. In early July, news emerged that the UAE was piloting a streamlined lifetime Golden Visa pathway for Indian nationals under the UAE‑India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Under the pilot, eligible Indian applicants could receive life-long residency without property investment, upon nomination and the payment of AED 100,000. This development appears to have driven a surge in media attention and consultation requests aimed at service providers.

While the ICP has not confirmed or elaborated on a pilot programme specific to any nationality, it advised the public to seek information strictly through official platforms. Interested parties are encouraged to consult the ICP website or app for updates on visa categories, including any new arrangements introduced under international agreements.

Signals from the UAE government reflect a dual strategy: expanding its talent- and investment-focused Golden Visa system, while firmly safeguarding procedural integrity. Through legislative collaboration, digital transformation, and cross-border trade agreements, the UAE continues to enhance its residency framework. However, officials remain vigilant against exploitation and fraudulent intermediaries.

As the visa environment evolves, clarity from ICP and associated authorities remains vital. Their recent intervention serves to remind the public that any deviations from established criteria are unauthorised and legally questionable. For those pursuing Golden Visa status, due diligence and reliance on official channels are indispensable.

Bitcoin held in exchange wallets has plunged to levels not seen in years, data from Coinglass and Glassnode indicate, underlining a shift towards long‑term holding and tightening liquidity.

According to Coinglass, total Bitcoin reserves across centralised exchanges have fallen to approximately 2.07 million BTC, marking a fresh low measured in this multi‑year timeframe. Glassnode data confirms that exchange-held Bitcoin as a percentage of total supply has dipped below 15%—a level unseen since 2018.

The depletion has been rapid: Coinglass reports that around 65,000 BTC exited major exchanges last week, pushing exchange balances down to near record lows. CryptoQuant analysis shows hot OTC reserves have also shrunk to roughly 146,000 BTC—declining from 480,000 BTC in September 2021—signalling broader supply erosion across both exchange and OTC channels.

Market analysts interpret these metrics as evidence of sustained accumulation by both retail and institutional investors. Transfers to cold storage and self‑custody wallets are rising sharply, coinciding with surging inflows to spot Bitcoin exchange‑traded funds since early 2024. Long‑standing holders and whales appear to be shifting their assets off‑platform, leading to what many describe as a looming supply shock.

This supply constriction factors into Bitcoin’s recent upside, where the price has rallied above the US $100,000 threshold and briefly touched US $110,000. Reduced available supply on exchanges dampens immediate selling pressure, while rising demand—particularly from ETF vehicles—supports upward momentum. Sentiment indicators reinforce this stance: CryptoQuant notes more than 85% of Bitcoin holders are in profit, suggesting limited incentive to sell.

Institutional trends underpin the narrative. Major asset managers such as BlackRock and Fidelity are funneling substantial reserves into ETF custody, moving assets off‑exchange and altering the liquidity dynamic. Corporates including MicroStrategy continue on‑chain accumulation as part of treasury strategies, while some national financial bodies are exploring Bitcoin holdings.

Analysts warn, however, that reduced float may lead to heightened volatility. A supply shock typically amplifies price moves—up and down—with heavy liquidations already observed: Coinglass data shows US $203 million of Bitcoin short positions were liquidated in under 24 hours during the brief rally above US $110,000. At the same time, positive global factors such as easing US–China trade tensions and expectations of interest‑rate cuts are adding fuel to risk assets, including Bitcoin.

Examining the wider picture, the halving event of April 2024, which halved block rewards to 3.125 BTC, continues to weigh on supply dynamics. With new issuance curtailed and existing supply migrating into private custody, on‑chain metrics show persistent outflows from exchanges. CryptoQuant’s Fund Flow Ratio also points to historic levels of “hodling” behaviour.

Whale activity mirrors the shift. Over the past month, Coinglass recorded withdrawals totalling more than 56,000 BTC from centralised exchanges. At the same time, metrics from CryptoQuant show centralised exchange reserves falling by roughly 550,000 BTC since mid‑2024, tightening the supply significantly.

While most analysts interpret the current balance trends as bullish, some caution is warranted. If investor sentiment reverses or macro‑economic shocks trigger rapid sell‑off, the thin on‑exchange liquidity could exacerbate price swings. Still, the dominant view frames the phenomenon as a structural supply retraction, particularly intensified by institutional demand.