News related to
AI trade

The total Ethereum balance held across centralized exchanges has dropped to its lowest level in nine years, a trend that reflects broader shifts in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. According to data from blockchain analytics firm Glassnode, the decline is part of a wider move towards decentralised finance solutions and self-custody. The drop in ETH held on exchanges is viewed as a significant signal for the cryptocurrency market, highlighting a transformation in investor behaviour and the growing trust in blockchain-based alternatives.

The total amount of ETH on exchanges has seen a steady decline over the past few years. Figures from Glassnode show that as of late 2025, the figure stands at its lowest since 2016. This shift is attributed to multiple factors, ranging from the rise of Ethereum 2.0, a push for increased decentralisation, to increased concerns over the security and control of centralized platforms. Investors are increasingly opting to take control of their assets, preferring private wallets, staking services, and decentralised protocols over traditional exchanges.

Experts suggest the move could be indicative of a maturing market. “This trend shows a growing level of sophistication among investors,” said Dr. Linus Hoff, an economist at the Blockchain Research Institute. “Ethereum’s evolving infrastructure, such as the transition to proof-of-stake and increasing use of layer-2 scaling solutions, is leading to a more confident investor base.” The shift away from exchanges also speaks to broader concerns over centralised platforms following a series of high-profile exchange failures and regulatory scrutiny.

Ethereum’s shift to proof-of-stake, which completed its transition in 2022, has had a profound impact on the ETH market. The upgrade enables holders to stake their ETH, earning rewards for supporting the network’s security, rather than leaving their assets on exchanges. This has fostered a growing staking ecosystem where users are incentivised to lock their ETH into DeFi platforms or staking protocols, removing it from exchange balances.

The declining ETH supply on exchanges has consequences for market liquidity. Lower liquidity can sometimes lead to higher volatility, with fewer assets available for immediate sale or trade. However, it can also reduce downward pressure on ETH prices, as large sell-offs become more difficult due to a lower concentration of tokens on exchanges.

The movement of ETH away from exchanges coincides with growing concerns over security. Many investors, especially those who have witnessed the collapses of firms like FTX and Celsius, are moving their holdings to wallets and decentralized applications. As a result, decentralized finance protocols have witnessed rapid growth in adoption. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi has increased by over 40% in the past 12 months, with Ethereum remaining the dominant blockchain.

The continued growth of Ethereum’s staking ecosystem has become a focal point of this shift. As Ethereum offers a higher annual percentage yield for staking ETH compared to other forms of investment, it presents an attractive option for long-term holders. Decentralized exchanges like Uniswap and Sushiswap have benefitted from the movement, with increasing volumes being traded on these platforms. Furthermore, institutional adoption of Ethereum as a staking asset is increasing, providing another layer of legitimacy to the DeFi ecosystem.

The broader implications of the trend also affect the governance of Ethereum itself. As more ETH moves off exchanges and into private wallets or staking protocols, the distribution of Ethereum across a wider range of holders could lead to more decentralised decision-making. This trend could reinforce Ethereum’s position as the go-to blockchain for decentralised applications and smart contracts, which are critical to its future development.

Bullish bets on rising US oil prices plunged to a 16-year low as mounting expectations of an oversupplied market and cooling fears of sanctions on Russian crude prompted a sharp pullback by traders.

Net-long positions in West Texas Intermediate futures dropped by nearly 30,000 contracts in a single week, reaching just over 49,000—a level not seen since 2009. The shift came amid forecasts from the International Energy Agency and the US government signalling that global oil supplies will outstrip demand well into 2026, tipping sentiment decisively bearish.

Analysts have noted that expectations of Russian sanctions are beginning to fade. While geopolitical risks had earlier supported price premiums, markets now reckon that even if sanctions are imposed, ample spare capacity among OPEC+ producers and resilient non-OPEC output would cushion any disruptions. Compounding the downward pressure, the US Energy Information Administration reported an unexpected build of 3 million barrels in crude inventories, further weighing on prices.

The retreat in bullish positions is consistent with a broader narrative of abundant supply. In late July, hedge funds slashed their net-long WTI positions to their lowest since mid-April, driven by OPEC+ ramping up production and a surge in US crude stockpiles—a rise of 7.7 million barrels recorded at the end of July. Earlier in the year, speculators trimmed net-long holdings by half over a five-week span amid deteriorating technical outlooks, trade-war concerns and expectations that OPEC+ would taper production cuts.

Despite these bearish trends, forecasters caution that demand could provide occasional counter-currents. Wildfires in Canada have temporarily removed around 350,000 barrels per day of oil from production, supporting prices in the short term. Meanwhile, geopolitical flashpoints—including tensions around Iran’s nuclear programme and Russian export vulnerability—could intermittently bolster outlooks. But with OPEC+ intent on increasing output—for example, by 411,000 barrels per day in July—and projections indicating a supply surplus growing to over a million barrels per day by year-end, the dominant trend remains one of oversupply.

This convergence of factors—ample supplies, fading sanctions risk, swelling US inventories and rising OPEC+ output—has catalysed a reappraisal of market dynamics by speculators. The resulting collapse in bullish positioning reflects a recalibration of expectations amid shifting fundamentals.

Narratives of tight supply have lost momentum, leading to a revaluation of oil’s near-term trajectory across trading desks worldwide.

Futu Securities International has launched Solana trading on its Futu NiuNiu App in Hong Kong, marking a significant step in expanding access to digital asset markets. The launch comes on the heels of a broader push for crypto adoption across Asia and aims to offer more flexible trading opportunities to the region’s retail investors.

This move positions Futu Securities, an influential brokerage firm, as a key player in the competitive landscape of cryptocurrency trading in Hong Kong. The company has been focusing on bridging traditional financial services with digital asset trading, reflecting a growing trend in the region towards integrating blockchain technology into mainstream investment platforms.

The new trading feature allows users to trade Solana directly, a cryptocurrency known for its high-speed transactions and scalability, which have positioned it as a potential competitor to Ethereum. The decision to add Solana to the platform follows a series of strategic partnerships and product enhancements by Futu, aimed at capturing a share of the rapidly evolving crypto trading market.

Solana’s inclusion is particularly notable given the increasing popularity of decentralized finance platforms and non-fungible tokens, sectors where Solana has made significant strides. Its fast transaction speeds and lower fees have made it a favourable option for developers and traders alike. By offering this asset, Futu Securities provides its customers with greater flexibility to tap into the growth of blockchain-based applications.

The launch also comes at a time when other crypto trading platforms are making similar moves to expand their offerings. The competitive pressure is particularly intense in Hong Kong, a city that is positioning itself as a major hub for digital assets in Asia. Several firms are already catering to the burgeoning demand for cryptocurrency products, prompting regulators to adapt to the new landscape.

Hong Kong’s regulators have taken a balanced approach to crypto oversight, striving to foster innovation while ensuring the protection of investors. This regulatory stance has attracted firms like Futu to launch new offerings with confidence, knowing that the regulatory framework is supportive of such developments.

Futu’s move into the retail Solana trading space also ties into the broader trend of financial firms integrating digital currencies into their portfolios. The platform already offers trading in various other digital assets, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, making Solana’s addition a natural extension of their crypto offerings.

This shift is not isolated to Hong Kong alone. Several other financial institutions in Asia have been exploring ways to incorporate blockchain technology into their traditional business models. Many see digital currencies as a way to diversify their service offerings and attract a new wave of tech-savvy investors who are more inclined to explore innovative financial products.

Futu Securities’ push into the crypto space also follows its international expansion strategy. The company has been actively seeking ways to grow its customer base beyond the borders of mainland China, where stricter crypto regulations have limited access to digital asset markets. By capitalising on Hong Kong’s more open regulatory environment, Futu aims to strengthen its position in the broader Asia-Pacific region.

As retail investors in Hong Kong and across Asia continue to show increasing interest in cryptocurrencies, platforms like Futu NiuNiu are tapping into this growing demand by offering accessible and secure trading options. This aligns with broader trends in the financial industry where the lines between traditional and digital assets are becoming increasingly blurred.

The decision to offer Solana trading comes at a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency market. Solana has garnered attention as a potential alternative to Ethereum, largely due to its speed and lower costs. With the platform’s growing user base, the ability to trade SOL on a mainstream brokerage app represents an important shift in how digital assets are perceived by traditional investors.

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has outlined a bold vision for the future of finance, predicting that all assets, from stocks to real estate, will eventually transition onto the blockchain. This shift, according to Armstrong, will revolutionise the way financial transactions are conducted, making them faster, more efficient, and significantly cheaper. The move is expected to create a completely decentralised financial ecosystem, one where traditional intermediaries like banks may no longer play a central role.

Armstrong’s statement comes at a time when blockchain technology is gaining increasing traction among various sectors. While blockchain has long been associated with cryptocurrencies, Armstrong suggests its potential far exceeds digital currencies alone. He believes that within the next decade, the technology could become the backbone for managing and transferring all types of assets. This would include everything from equities and bonds to even more complex forms of ownership like real estate and intellectual property.

Blockchain’s ability to offer decentralisation and transparency, he argues, will be key to this transformation. As assets move onto the blockchain, they will become tokenised, meaning that rather than relying on centralised systems to manage ownership records, the blockchain will store and verify ownership in a secure, distributed ledger. According to Armstrong, this will eliminate the need for intermediaries, thereby reducing transaction fees and processing times.

Despite the significant potential, Armstrong acknowledges that this shift will not happen overnight. He envisions a gradual, step-by-step transition, with larger, more established companies leading the charge. These companies, he suggests, will start by leveraging blockchain technology to raise capital, such as through initial coin offerings or security token offerings, which could serve as models for others to follow.

One of the major hurdles to widespread adoption, Armstrong notes, is the regulatory landscape. Governments and regulators around the world have yet to fully define how blockchain-based assets will be governed, and this uncertainty could delay the integration of blockchain into traditional markets. However, Armstrong remains optimistic, citing the increasing number of regulators engaging with blockchain technology as a sign of progress. He believes that once clear frameworks are established, the technology will gain broader acceptance, even among conservative sectors like banking.

In addition to blockchain’s efficiency gains, Armstrong sees another major advantage: greater accessibility. One of the core tenets of blockchain technology is decentralisation, which could potentially provide more individuals with access to the financial markets. Traditional financial systems often rely on intermediaries, such as brokers and banks, that can impose high fees or create barriers to entry for those outside the traditional financial system. Blockchain’s decentralised nature, on the other hand, allows for peer-to-peer transactions that bypass these intermediaries, opening the doors to a more inclusive financial ecosystem.

The implications of a fully tokenised world are far-reaching. If Armstrong’s predictions hold true, the ability to fractionalise ownership through tokenisation could unlock trillions of dollars in previously illiquid assets. Real estate, for example, could be fractionalised into smaller, tradable units, making it more accessible to a broader base of investors. Similarly, assets such as fine art or rare collectibles could be more easily traded without the need for high transaction costs or complicated paperwork.

Armstrong argues that blockchain could also play a role in reducing fraud. Because each transaction is recorded on a public ledger, it would become nearly impossible to falsify ownership or alter the transaction history. This level of transparency would provide a higher degree of security for all parties involved, potentially driving further adoption by consumers and institutional investors alike.

While the shift to a fully blockchain-based financial ecosystem remains a vision for the future, there are already signs that the trend is gaining momentum. In the past few years, major financial institutions and investment firms have started to explore blockchain applications, from using it to facilitate cross-border payments to tokenising real estate portfolios. These early moves by large players, combined with the increasing interest from retail investors, signal that the path Armstrong envisions could be on the horizon.

Yet, challenges remain. The infrastructure required to support a fully on-chain economy, including high-performance blockchains capable of handling vast amounts of data, is still in development. Furthermore, the environmental impact of blockchain networks, particularly those that rely on proof-of-work consensus mechanisms, has raised concerns about sustainability. These issues will need to be addressed if blockchain is to truly become the ubiquitous technology that Armstrong envisions.

The cryptocurrency market has suffered a significant blow, with over $500 million in liquidations across positions within just one hour. This sharp decline follows the release of the latest U. S. Producer Price Index report, which revealed unexpectedly high inflation figures. The data has dashed investor hopes for imminent interest rate cuts by the U. S. Federal Reserve, sparking widespread panic and a sell-off across multiple crypto assets.

The PPI report, which tracks the change in prices that producers receive for goods and services, showed an uptick in inflation that exceeded analysts’ expectations. The results were particularly alarming given the U. S. Federal Reserve’s ongoing battle to control inflation. As a result, the market now faces a more aggressive stance from the central bank, with investors bracing for potential rate hikes rather than cuts, at least in the short term.

This shift in sentiment has had a dramatic impact on risk assets, particularly in the volatile crypto market. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and several altcoins saw rapid declines in their valuations, with the overall market sentiment turning bearish. Liquidation volumes surged as traders, particularly those with leveraged positions, were forced to sell their assets to cover their margin calls.

Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalisation, saw a drop of over 5% in just a few hours, while Ethereum and other major altcoins followed suit with steep losses. The sell-off was not confined to smaller coins either; large-cap cryptos that are usually seen as more stable also witnessed significant price drops. Some analysts have warned that the market could continue its downward trajectory if inflation remains persistent and the Fed keeps its hawkish policy stance in place.

The crypto market had previously been showing signs of optimism, especially after recent rallies that saw prices inch higher. Many market participants had hoped that the Federal Reserve, under pressure from slower economic growth, would begin to reduce interest rates in the latter half of 2023, which would typically support riskier assets like cryptocurrencies. However, the latest PPI figures dashed such expectations, leading to a sharp reversal in market sentiment.

The primary concern now is the potential for more stringent monetary tightening, which could further dampen investor appetite for high-risk assets. Rising interest rates often drive capital out of speculative markets, as higher borrowing costs make riskier assets less appealing compared to traditional investments like bonds or equities.

Some analysts are predicting that the current market instability could persist for some time, especially if inflationary pressures continue to be a concern. “Cryptocurrencies are still seen as speculative assets, and as long as inflation remains high and the Fed is tightening, there is little room for these assets to flourish,” said one senior strategist at a leading global investment bank.

The liquidations across the crypto market serve as a stark reminder of the inherent risks of trading in this volatile space. Traders leveraging their positions to maximise profits are particularly vulnerable in such an environment, as even small fluctuations in price can trigger substantial losses. The crypto market’s high leverage environment is often seen as a double-edged sword, where both potential rewards and risks are amplified.

Beyond the immediate price impact, there are broader concerns about how the crypto market might react to further tightening measures by the Fed. If inflation continues to exceed expectations, market participants may be forced to adjust their strategies, potentially driving further price declines.

This shake-up has led to heightened calls for regulation within the crypto space. Industry experts have long argued that greater oversight is needed to protect investors and reduce the risks associated with volatile market movements. The sudden surge in liquidations underscores the importance of establishing clearer guidelines for trading and risk management in cryptocurrencies.

Oil prices held steady after a slight decline in thin trading, with market participants awaiting a critical meeting between US and Russian leaders. Global benchmark Brent crude remained above $66 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate hovered around $63.

The modest drop in prices, which amounted to a 0.8% decrease in the previous session, marked a quiet period in the market as traders refrained from making significant moves. Investors are now looking ahead to upcoming discussions between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. These talks are expected to set the stage for a high-stakes summit between President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin, scheduled for later this week.

The ongoing volatility in oil markets, coupled with geopolitical uncertainty, has contributed to the recent fluctuation in prices. Despite this, oil has largely remained above the $60 per barrel mark, as tightening supplies and ongoing tensions in key production regions continue to support price levels.

Analysts are paying close attention to the diplomatic developments between the US and Russia, which could have broader implications for the energy sector. Market sentiment has been influenced by both nations’ roles as major players in global energy production and their influence on decisions within organisations such as OPEC+.

The summit will centre around various issues, including security concerns and energy policies. With both nations holding significant sway in global oil production, the discussions could have far-reaching consequences for the market. A breakthrough or escalated tension could prompt either a surge or a dip in oil prices depending on the outcome of the talks.

Investors are also looking at other global factors that could sway oil prices. In the US, the energy industry is continuing to recover from the impacts of the pandemic, with some analysts forecasting a strong rebound in demand as economies continue to reopen. However, the overall uncertainty surrounding economic recovery, inflation concerns, and ongoing supply chain issues are making the market particularly sensitive to external events.

OPEC+, the alliance of oil-producing nations, has played a significant role in stabilising prices in the past year. Its production cuts, alongside the gradual return of demand, have helped lift oil prices from the lows seen in 2020. As the group navigates production decisions and adapts to the changing landscape, it has become a crucial player in shaping the trajectory of global oil markets.

In addition to geopolitical tensions, the market is also contending with shifting dynamics in energy consumption. The growing push for renewable energy and the evolving role of electric vehicles are reshaping demand forecasts. With governments around the world pledging to reduce carbon emissions and transition towards greener energy sources, there is a growing expectation that long-term demand for fossil fuels may face pressure. This evolving energy landscape will inevitably impact the future of oil markets.

Despite these broader trends, short-term market activity is heavily influenced by supply-demand imbalances, particularly in the wake of global events. As the US and Russia prepare for their talks, traders will continue to watch for any signals of change in the balance of power within the energy sector. A shift in policy or a sudden geopolitical event could have immediate and lasting effects on oil prices.

Hyperliquid, a decentralised exchange platform, has resolved a significant technical issue that temporarily hindered user access to its trading services. The glitch, reported by users in various online communities, involved a disruption that prevented some traders from executing orders and impacted the platform’s ability to update prices accurately. The malfunction, which occurred during a period of high trading volume, raised concerns about the reliability of the system, with some users expressing frustration over the lack of transparency and communication from the platform’s support team.

The issue first came to light after multiple reports surfaced from users who found themselves unable to place or complete transactions, while others faced price slippage due to delays in the system’s updates. The disruption coincided with a surge in demand for certain assets, leading to increased pressure on the platform’s infrastructure. Hyperliquid acknowledged the problem in a statement, revealing that it was related to a backend technical failure in its order-matching system, which handles the execution of trades.

Technical teams at Hyperliquid worked quickly to address the malfunction, with a fix implemented within several hours. The platform’s engineers carried out a series of updates to its infrastructure and order-matching logic, designed to prevent such issues from recurring. Hyperliquid assured its users that it was closely monitoring the situation and would continue to improve its systems to ensure a smooth trading experience in the future.

This glitch on Hyperliquid is part of a wider trend that has raised concerns about the stability of decentralised exchanges, which rely on smart contract-based mechanisms to execute transactions. While decentralised platforms are often touted as more secure and resistant to manipulation, they can face unique technical challenges that centralised exchanges do not. These issues range from software bugs to network congestion and other performance bottlenecks, particularly during periods of heightened activity.

In light of this disruption, many users have called for greater transparency from decentralised exchange platforms regarding their technical operations. Some have questioned whether such glitches could undermine trust in the decentralised finance space, which is increasingly seen as an alternative to traditional financial systems. The DeFi ecosystem has seen explosive growth in recent years, with millions of dollars flowing through platforms like Hyperliquid. However, incidents like this highlight the vulnerabilities inherent in even the most sophisticated blockchain-based systems.

Hyperliquid’s response to the outage, including the quick deployment of a fix, has been largely positive among the platform’s users, although many are still wary of potential future disruptions. Several traders noted that while the issue was resolved swiftly, the lack of clear communication from the platform during the downtime was a point of contention. Some have suggested that platforms like Hyperliquid could benefit from providing users with more detailed updates in real time, especially during periods of service disruption.

The incident has also sparked a broader conversation within the DeFi community about the need for better infrastructure and risk management protocols. Experts have pointed out that while decentralised exchanges offer innovative features such as privacy and self-custody of funds, their technological foundations must be solid enough to handle spikes in demand without compromising the user experience.