News related to
AI trade

Luma Protocol, incubated by PopChain and Nivex, officially entered the market on 20 September 2025, positioning itself as a new architecture in decentralized finance that anchors value in computing power rather than speculative token mechanics. At midday UTC+8 the project launched its pre-sale and, within hours, issued the first mining rewards — signalling a shift from purely token-based incentives toward infrastructure-backed models.

The project’s core proposition is that “Hash Power” — the computational capacity underlying blockchains — becomes a tangible, tradeable asset integrated into DeFi systems. Luma’s model seeks to counterbalance what its promoters describe as the unsustainable cycles of token subsidies that have affected prior generations of DeFi protocols. Underpinning the system, Luma plans to merge capital, computational resource markets, and application layers in a closed-loop infrastructure.

PopChain contributes its identity and settlement capabilities, while Nivex offers liquidity, exchange infrastructure, and compliance support. This strategic alignment aims to deliver an ecosystem where value issuance, transaction execution, and mining resource distribution interlock. According to the announcement, the first mining rewards were disbursed at midnight UTC+8, immediately after launching the pre-sale.

Market reaction to the LUMA token has been volatile. On the MEXC exchange, LUMA traded with a 24-hour jump of 26 per cent, reflecting speculative interest. Yet the token’s 7-day price variance is extremely steep, plunging nearly 99.97 per cent over the week, pointing to high risk and low liquidity stability. The circulating supply and full market capitalisation currently remain opaque.

Critics caution that the concept of tokenizing hash power is not without inherent risk. In the realm of blockchain security, high concentration of mining capacity has historically exposed smaller networks to attacks. The accessibility of mining power through services like NiceHash demonstrates how hash power can be rented and concentrated, creating vulnerability, especially for new entrants. At the same time, mainstream DeFi research underscores systemic risks emerging from leverage, protocol interdependence, and opacity in governance.

Luma’s governance architecture is not fully detailed in public documentation, but the model will need to grapple with decentralised decision-making, hardware centralisation, and incentives for fair participation. Without sufficient safeguards, the protocol may face the same challenges of centralisation, collusion, or exploitability that have troubled other DeFi platforms.

For its part, Nivex has been scaling its ecosystem prior to Luma’s debut. It recently launched a Web3 wallet integrated with PopChain, with plans to embed users into a flow from wallet to liquidity operations to settlement. This vertical integration may benefit Luma by driving demand for the infrastructure stack. Nivex also recently listed the POP/USDT trading pair, anchoring the POP ecosystem that underlies PopChain’s social finance ambitions.

On the supply side, the broader mining industry’s economics are under strain. Electricity, hardware depreciation, and operational costs continue to restrict profitable deployment of hash power. The Cambridge Digital Mining Report underscores that energy cost variance across geographies is a major barrier for expansion. Projects that seek to monetise compute power must navigate this cost differential.

The Indian rupee plunged to a lifetime low of ₹88.7975 per US dollar, sliding about 0.5 per cent on the day as fears over a sharp hike in U. S. H-1B visa fees rallied selling pressure across foreign exchange markets. Intervention by the Reserve Bank of India failed to staunch the slide fully, leaving the currency exposed amid faltering capital inflows and heightened external risks.

Markets pointed to the visa fee jump as a critical trigger. The Trump administration’s new proclamation imposes a $100,000 application cost on fresh H-1B visa petitions, vastly above its prior range, and is widely seen as a threat to remittance flows and the earnings outlook for India’s technology exporters. Meanwhile, persistent foreign portfolio outflows and U. S. tariff tensions on Indian goods compounded downward pressure.

Analysts estimate that remittances from the U. S. account for roughly 3.4 per cent of India’s GDP, making any disruption in the flow of workers and repatriated funds significant for the external balance. The visa change, if sustained, could erode that buffer. Traders now widely expect the rupee’s trajectory to remain weak in the coming weeks unless policy tailwinds emerge.

Speculation is building that the RBI sold dollars via state banks in the ₹88.50 zone to support the rupee, but the support was limited. While intervention took multiple forms—spot market, non-deliverable forwards and futures—the central bank appears to be managing volatility more than defending a fixed exchange rate. Some market participants view the decline as partly calibrated and allowable, until macro fundamentals justify a reversal.

Data from the RBI’s monthly bulletin show that in July alone, the central bank sold a net $2.54 billion in the spot foreign exchange market. It held forward dollar sales of about $57.85 billion at the end of July—suggesting pre-emptive hedging and reserve deployment to offset pressure. The use of forward sales is a tool to mitigate speculative demand and signal resolve.

U. S. rate expectations and the global dollar trajectory also weigh heavily. The U. S. dollar index remains firm, underpinning strength in emerging market currency pairs’ downside. Weakness in India’s export performance and looming protectionist measures add to caution. In September to date, foreign investors withdrew over $1 billion from Indian equities, pushing year-to-date outflows to roughly $16 billion.

Technology stocks bore the brunt of the rupee stress. With margins threatened by the visa fee shock, several large IT firms are already budgeting for higher immigration costs. Estimates place incremental fee burdens between $150 million and $550 million for major firms, depending on visa volumes and contract structures.

The Indian government mounted a diplomatic push in response, deploying a high-level delegation to Washington to discuss the visa fee policy and broader trade concerns. Delhi has warned of “humanitarian consequences,” arguing that abrupt changes in visa costs risk disrupting families and the livelihood of highly skilled professionals. In public remarks, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and other officials have insisted that they will press for reversals or carveouts.

White House sources clarified that the $100,000 fee will apply only to new applications, not renewals or current visa holders—a move that soothed some immediate concerns in the IT industry. That assurance has allowed short-term relief in some quarters, though uncertainty lingers over enforcement guidelines and compliance timelines.

Exports of gasoline and diesel from India have climbed to multi-year highs in 2025, pushed by expanded refinery output, elevated ethanol blending, and weakening domestic demand during the monsoon season. Analysts expect gasoil shipments to reach 610,000–630,000 barrels per day, according to Wood Mackenzie, while Kpler forecasts hover nearer 560,000 bpd.

Heightened crude processing capacity has enabled major refiners such as Reliance Industries and Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd to divert more fuel into exports. Gasoline exports are estimated at about 400,000 bpd this year, supported by the country’s adoption of 20 % ethanol blending in petrol—a marked rise from 12 % in 2023.

Much of India’s diesel is now bound for Europe, where supply may tighten later this year due to refinery maintenance across the Middle East and Europe. The shift is occurring as the European Union phases in restrictions on refined petroleum imports derived from Russian crude, which clears the way for alternative sources. In August alone, India’s diesel exports to Europe surged by 137 % year-on-year, reaching 242,000 bpd.

India’s push into export markets is aided by discounts on Russian crude supplied during Western sanctions, allowing refiners to maintain margins even as exports grow. The increase in export volumes comes despite diplomatic criticism from Washington, which questions the use of discounted crude for profit. India asserts that its procurement practices stabilise global fuel markets rather than distort them.

Domestically, the monsoon period has dampened fuel demand, helping free up surplus supply for export. In parallel, Indian refiners have managed fewer unscheduled maintenance shutdowns, keeping plants operating near capacity. Wood Mackenzie anticipates India’s crude processing will increase by 130,000 to 160,000 bpd in 2025, reaching around 5.51 million bpd.

The higher share of ethanol in petrol has been key to redirecting conventional fuel toward exports. As of August, India achieved a 19.8 % ethanol blend—putting the country on track for its 20 % target. To facilitate further expansion of cleaner fuels, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade has also authorised exports of second-generation ethanol, subject to certification and authorisation.

Europe’s transition away from Russian-derived refined products leaves a strategic opening for India. Saudi Arabia’s refined product shipments are projected to dip by about 300,000 bpd in October–November due to maintenance of several Aramco plants, creating additional export opportunities for Indian producers.

Yet the surge is not without complexity. In April 2025, India’s diesel exports hit their lowest point in over a decade, dropping to an estimated 1.15 million metric tons amid refinery maintenance at the Jamnagar complex. That earlier slump underscores the delicate balance between sustaining export momentum and managing domestic operations.

Simultaneously, India is also redirecting surplus rice stocks toward ethanol production to bolster blending targets. The government has allocated 5.2 million metric tons of rice for biofuel conversion—a move that helps ease pressure on grain reserves while reinforcing fuel strategy.

MetaMask’s long-awaited native token, MASK, has received confirmation from ConsenSys CEO Joe Lubin that it is on the horizon, stoking anticipation across crypto markets. Lubin suggested the token may arrive sooner than many expect, reawakening speculation about a potential airdrop tied to user activity. Traders have already begun positioning around the move.

Parallel to the MASK buzz, derivatives activity around Aster’s native token has escalated dramatically: futures open interest has expanded by 46 per cent, reflecting aggressive speculative demand.

Bitcoin’s climb toward as high as $113,500 has added momentum to altcoin risk appetite, though analysts warn of resistance near $115,000 as a critical hurdle for sustained upside.

Momentum behind Aster has been fuelled by on‐chain flows and whale accumulation. One address spent over $1.18 million acquiring nearly 595,580 ASTER tokens in a single trade, underscoring deep-pocketed conviction in the token’s trajectory. Aster has also introduced 300x leverage trading for HYPE, drawing comparison and competition with Hyperliquid’s native token ecosystem.

Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s own tokenomics are under pressure. A major holder transferred around 200,000 HYPE tokens—worth roughly $8.9 million—within two hours, moving the assets toward Aster platforms. The selling pressure from large holders is prompting governance discussions: one proposal suggests burning 45 per cent of HYPE supply to counterbalance impending token unlocks.

Liquidity metrics reflect the competitive dynamics among perpetual DEX platforms. While Hyperliquid historically dominated, new entrants such as Aster, Lighter and edgeX are aggressively capturing share through incentives and token distribution programmes. Some analysts caution that much of Aster’s volume is driven by incentive-seeking rather than long-term retention.

The MASK narrative adds an extra layer of complexity. Decrypt reports that prediction markets assign roughly 32 per cent odds to a token launch by November, indicating widespread uncertainty despite Lubin’s confident tone. MetaMask’s path to decentralisation is expected to involve allocation to active users—those conducting swaps or interacting with dApps—though tokenomics remain unpublished.

Traders are watching to see whether cross-correlations form between MASK speculation and derivative positioning in ASTER and HYPE. If Aster’s futures momentum continues, it may draw further capital away from incumbents, even while regulatory risk looms over token launches.

China’s goods exports expanded by 4.4% year-on-year in August, the slowest growth in six months, as shipments to the United States plunged more than 33%, weighed down by steep tariffs. Customs data showed imports rising just 1.3%, leading to a trade surplus of approximately US$102.3 billion for the month. China has now posted a goods surplus of more than US$785 billion through the first eight months of the year.

Exporters are offsetting the loss of U. S. demand by shifting focus to markets in Southeast Asia, Africa and Europe. Shipments to Southeast Asian nations rose 22.5%, while exports to Africa are on track for an annual peak, demonstrating that China’s firms are diversifying sales away from U. S. consumers.

India has emerged as a critical destination. August saw Chinese sales to India hit record highs, with strong volumes in electronics playing a central role. Firms assembling smartphones and components have increasingly used export routes into India, capitalising on shifting supply-chains that seek to avoid punitive duties in U. S. trade policy.

The gains elsewhere have only partially compensated for losses in the U. S. Bilateral shipments to America fell by about 33% in August compared to the same month last year; exports to the EU, by contrast, rose about 10.4%.

Manufacturers are accepting lower profit margins to maintain volume. Domestic industrial profits have declined in recent months as overcapacity forces price-cutting for export orders. Meanwhile, home consumption remains weak, undercut by a property sector in distress, tight credit for consumers, and muted wage growth.

Trade policy experts warn the durability of this export pivot depends heavily on external stability. Many countries receiving surging shipments from China are contemplating anti-dumping investigations; India, for example, has reportedly registered dozens of petitions addressing low-cost imports from China and Vietnam. Indonesia has raised concern over ultra-cheap clothing items appearing in its large urban markets.

Record trade worth AED 336 billion from the Dubai Integrated Economic Zones Authority across its three free zones marked a 19% increase over 2023, with the zone authority accounting for 13.7% of Dubai’s non-oil foreign trade—the highest share recorded.

Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai Silicon Oasis and Dubai CommerCity together processed trade volumes of 444,300 tonnes, representing a rise of over 28% compared with 346,700 tonnes the year prior. Sector-wise, machinery, electrical and electronics led the growth, making up about 72% of total trade and increasing by approximately 17%. Precious stones, metals, jewellery and ornaments grew by 33% and contributed about 22%. Combined, both sectors accounted for nearly 94% of total trade activity.

Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai and Chairman of the Executive Council, stated that these outcomes reflect Dubai’s ambition under the Economic Agenda D33, enhancing its role as a global hub through innovation and competitiveness. Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum, Chairman of DIEZ, affirmed this was the fourth year of sustained growth, noting increasing investor confidence and strengthened global trade partnerships.

Volume growth and value growth were supported by improved infrastructure and “integrated services” across the three zones, which reduced friction in supply chains. DIEZ’s performance coincided with Dubai as a whole achieving record highs in non-oil foreign trade.

While machinery, electronics and precious materials drove most of the expansion, other sectors are underrepresented, indicating a dependency on high-value goods. The focus now may turn to diversification to prevent vulnerabilities to sector-specific global headwinds. Economists suggest sustaining infrastructure investment and expanding trade ties beyond traditional markets will be critical for maintaining momentum.

Crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, known as BitBoy, has asserted that Ripple’s XRP possesses potential to rival Bitcoin’s dominance—not in every metric, but in overall market influence and growth. He argues that while Bitcoin remains unmatched on decentralisation and brand recognition, XRP may outpace Bitcoin in return-on-investment and adoption under certain conditions.

Armstrong points to several factors he believes could drive XRP forward: its far faster transaction settlement times, its emerging use for cross-border payments, and increasing interest from both retail and institutional investors. He acknowledges these victories come with drawbacks—particularly XRP’s higher centralisation compared with Bitcoin, given significant holdings of its supply are controlled by Ripple.

He describes market capitalisation as one pathway for competition, noting that XRP lags far behind Bitcoin’s more than US$2 trillion valuation. Nevertheless, he suggests that XRP could narrow that gap by capitalising on regulatory improvements and product developments in the crypto space. He cited possibilities such as exchange-traded funds for XRP and Ripple’s potential corporate moves that could boost legitimacy.

Comparisons with Ethereum form a large part of Armstrong’s argument. He has predicted that XRP may overtake Ethereum in market cap, saying Ethereum’s role in decentralised finance gives it current strength but also comes with trade-offs in efficiency and scalability. XRP, in his view, may benefit from being lighter in overhead, and more directly applicable in payment systems. Critics, however, highlight that Ethereum’s developer ecosystem, DeFi dominance, and smart contract utility are powerful advantages that XRP must overcome.

Recent legal developments related to Ripple have itself affected XRP’s trajectory. Armstrong notes that favourable rulings, greater regulatory clarity in jurisdictions like the US, and growing institutional interest are enhancing investor confidence. He also emphasises that the narrative around cryptocurrency regulation is shifting, which could favour assets like XRP that are often under scrutiny.

On price forecasts, Armstrong has offered a range of scenarios: gains ranging from three-fold to much higher depending on whether certain catalysts—such as regulatory approvals or ETF launches—unfold as hoped. He cautions that for XRP to truly rival Bitcoin, sustained momentum must be maintained over a multi-year horizon, not just in speculative bursts.

U. S. regulators have approved Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund conversion into an exchange-traded fund that will hold multiple cryptocurrencies in a single product. The fund will allocate more than 70% to Bitcoin and about 17% to Ether, with the remainder distributed among XRP, Solana, and Cardano.

The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted new generic listing standards for commodity-based spot crypto ETFs, allowing exchanges such as NYSE Arca, Nasdaq, and Cboe BZX to list qualifying funds without bespoke approval filings. These rules cut the maximum approval time from several months to as little as 75 days.

Grayscale Investments will be the first asset manager to launch a multi-crypto ETF under this framework. The GLDC product offers regulated exposure through traditional securities structures, permitting investors to access these broad crypto assets in a single fund rather than holding individual tokens. GLDC had existed before as an investment product but lacked ETF status until this regulatory shift.

Industry analysts consider this a pivotal moment for the broader digital asset market, extending beyond the earlier wave of Bitcoin-only or Ether-only products. The decision formalises recognition by regulators that crypto portfolios comprising major altcoins may be viable under oversight and regulatory expectations. It also reflects growing institutional demand for diversified exposure as volatility remains high among lesser-known tokens.

Some market participants caution that, despite its multi-asset nature, the heavy weighting toward Bitcoin and Ether means the fund’s performance may still be strongly driven by those two assets. Questions remain about how XRP, Solana, and Cardano portions will perform in different market environments, and how liquidity, custody, and valuation will be managed for the less dominant tokens.