News related to
Saudi

Court filings in the Chapter 11 case for collapsed exchange FTX suggest that users in 49 jurisdictions may see their claims disputed or denied over local crypto restrictions. A filing submitted on 2 July to the Delaware bankruptcy court outlines a new “hold‑and‑review” process, halting distributions to users in areas with bans on crypto trading or restrictions on offshore platforms.

FTX’s trustee, along with legal counsel, will evaluate whether paying out creditors in these jurisdictions violates local laws. Notices will then be issued to affected users, granting them at least 45 days to challenge their classification. Absent a timely response, claims and any accrued interest will be forfeited to the estate.

Although users in these 49 jurisdictions represent just 5% of approved claims, the financial exposure is heavily weighted. Over 82% of that total value originates from mainland China. China accounts for the vast majority of claims in what FTX labels “potentially restricted jurisdictions”. Advocates warn that most Chinese claimants may not recover any funds.

FTX’s court motion says it will seek legal opinions for each jurisdiction before approving any payout. If counsel concludes local law prohibits the disbursement, those claims will be formally challenged. The legal framework treats such claims as “disputed,” pending approval or denial of their status. Distributions will be suspended until those claims are resolved.

Affected users must submit sworn statements confirming acceptance of US court jurisdiction to pursue objections. Upon objection, the trustee will petition the court to determine if exclusion is justified. Lack of objection will result in automatic forfeiture.

The list of 49 jurisdictions includes not only China, but also countries such as Nigeria, Russia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Andorra, Fiji and Zimbabwe. That breadth reflects the wide global footprint of FTX prior to its collapse.

Chinese users have responded with alarm, exploring legal avenues in the US. One affected claimant, identified as “Will,” told media that though the crypto ban in mainland China prevents trading, holdings remain legal and ownership rights should entitle them to fiat reimbursement in US dollars. He has engaged a New York attorney to counter FTX’s position on wire transfers and jurisdictional exclusion.

Some creditors are studying whether to transfer or sell their claims through entities in compliant jurisdictions, though it remains unclear whether such mechanisms will resolve legal barriers.

FTX Recovery Trust reported an overall decline in disputed claims—from US $6.5 billion to US $4.6 billion—after approving $1.8 billion in claims and expecting another $2.7 billion to be cleared. Approved claim distributions have reached approximately $8.3 billion. This new policy specifically targets the subset linked to restricted jurs, leaving billions in limbo.

Legal experts suggest the court’s decision could set precedent for how bankruptcy courts manage cross‑border crypto claims when local compliance is at risk. FTX is therefore seeking judicial approval to formalise this tailored procedure.

Critics argue the move undermines proportional equity. Victims from major markets like China, Nigeria and Egypt, who collectively hold substantial unrationalised stakes, now face potential complete exclusion. These developments raise concerns about transparency and fairness in the global recovery process.

FTX’s reorganisation plan approved in October 2024 allows repayment of up to US $16.5 billion to customers. It prioritises accounts holding US $50,000 or less under the terms of the Chapter 11 order, but regional legal hurdles may override the general scheme.

Trustee Sunil Kavuri summarised that each claim will proceed only with a supportive local legal opinion. If the opinion concludes a payout contravenes domestic laws, the claim will be formally disputed and may be permanently disallowed.

Saudi Arabia’s burgeoning e‑commerce sector has taken a strategic leap forward as the landmark partnership between Maersk Saudi Arabia and Saudi Post transitions from agreement to action. Evidence is already emerging that this alliance—anchored by Maersk’s newly launched Integrated Logistics Park in Jeddah—is beginning to streamline the kingdom’s supply chains and attract international players.

Operations in Jeddah have officially begun, with Maersk overseeing global transport, bonded warehousing, and origin-end logistics, while SPL manages express customs clearance and last-mile delivery domestically. The MoU, signed on 3 July 2025, outlines joint digital integration, combined marketing, coordinated customer service and operational efficiency.

Industry sources suggest that several multinational online retailers are in advanced talks to leverage the new gateway. Although specific names have been withheld, analysts view the integrated model as particularly attractive to Asia‑based brands seeking fast, low‑cost market entry into Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf Cooperation Council.

Experts highlight that Maersk’s global reach combined with Saudi Post’s local footprint addresses major bottlenecks in cross-border trade—namely customs delays and fragmented distribution networks. SPL’s national infrastructure, originally developed to support Vision 2030’s economic diversification goals, now aligns seamlessly with Maersk’s logistics corridors.

Karsten Kildahl, Maersk’s Chief Commercial Officer, previously noted that global supply chains remain unpredictable, and enhanced visibility and resilience are crucial for upstream customers. This partnership directly supports those objectives via real‑time digital tracking, automated handovers, and unified service teams.

Market response has been swift. Regional logistics analysts report a 15% increase in inbound parcel volumes through Jeddah’s port cluster in the past month compared to the same period last year. While other factors—such as seasonal demand shifts—are at play, the increase aligns with the ramp‑up of cross-border operations facilitated by the Maersk–SPL alliance.

Customs officials in Jeddah confirm expedited clearances under a “premium e‑commerce lane” established within the SPL framework. They say this streamlining has shaved several days off processing times for inbound B2C shipments, helping foreign brands meet tight delivery schedules.

Saudi Post’s International Business Sales Director, Rouni Saad, stated the arrangement “is pivotal in streamlining cross‑border e‑commerce flows to and from the Kingdom … enhancing connectivity, reliability and growth opportunities across the region”. Maersk’s Ahmed Al Olaby added that combined networks would meet the growing demand for efficient fulfilment by global players entering or expanding in the Saudi market.

Consultants note that Saudi Arabia is now positioned to compete more effectively with regional hubs such as Dubai, which has long served as the GCC’s principal logistics centre. With the integrated infrastructure online, analysts predict intra‑GCC e‑commerce flows will re‑route through Jeddah over the next six to twelve months.

The alliance also aligns with Saudi Vision 2030, reinforcing the kingdom’s commitment to modernise its logistics backbone. By linking global ocean routes with domestic delivery channels, the partnership promises smoother, faster access to consumers in a market anticipated to grow double‑digit annually in e‑commerce sales.

However, questions remain around digital interoperability. The MoU commits to systems integration, but execution will depend on effective collaboration between both entities’ IT architectures. Some industry insiders stress the need for standardised APIs and seamless data sharing to avoid fragmentation.

Scaling services beyond major urban centres, and replicating integration in other GCC markets, pose additional challenges. Achieving cohesive bonded fulfilment across borders demands regulatory alignment and bilateral coordination.

BlackRock Inc is reportedly engaged in discussions with Saudi Aramco over the future ownership of its stake in the leasing rights of a major natural gas pipeline network. The asset manager, which entered the arrangement in 2021, acquired the rights as part of a $15.5 billion lease-and-leaseback agreement. Sources close to the matter indicate BlackRock now values its position at several billion dollars and is considering divesting the stake back to the state oil major.

In 2021, BlackRock joined a consortium to purchase a 49 per cent interest in an entity known as Aramco Gas Pipelines Co under a lease-and-leaseback deal, financing the project with bridge loans and later issuing bonds to refinance the structure. The network comprises critical infrastructure integral to Saudi Arabia’s petroleum operations, serving both domestic consumption and export logistics.

Financial analysts highlight that BlackRock’s move represents a shift in strategy for pipeline investments. As bond markets recover from turbulence and the global energy transition reshapes demand, investors are recalibrating their exposure to long-cycle fossil fuel assets. One advisor noted that BlackRock will “weigh other options if discussions don’t lead to agreement,” indicating the firm might pursue third‑party sales or stake dilution.

Saudi Aramco’s interest in regaining full control aligns with its broader strategy of asset consolidation. Reacquiring the lease rights would enhance its operational sovereignty and reduce dependency on external partners in a sector that underpins national energy security. Aramco’s share in regional indices has already seen modest gains, supported by optimism over non-oil growth; the company itself has been trading up by around 0.9 per cent in recent sessions.

The bonds issued by the consortium in 2024—worth $3 billion across tranches due in 2036 and 2042—were aimed at refinancing initial acquisition debts. Demand for those bonds was robust, with subscription levels significantly exceeding issuance. BlackRock’s majority ownership of Greensaif Pipelines Bidco grants it leverage in shaping any transaction, whether through direct sale or restructuring of lease terms.

Market observers note that BlackRock’s pivot may be driven as much by strategic repositioning as by financial calculation. With global pressure building on climate policy and energy transition commitments, large institutional investors are under increasing scrutiny over holdings tied to fossil fuel extraction and transport. Divesting from pipeline leases allows BlackRock to reallocate capital to renewable infrastructure or alternative energy real estate, while still preserving long-term client relationships.

However, the sale would mark a significant return on investment. The original acquisition and bond refinancing positioned BlackRock to gain from stable, long-duration lease revenues pegged to volume throughput. Exiting now at a multi-billion-dollar valuation ensures a profitable wind-down of exposure while the asset remains robust. Some of the stakeholders in the consortium may view this as a precedent for handling similar assets in other jurisdictions.

Observers anticipate a negotiation process extending into the next quarter, with both parties likely to focus on valuation frameworks, lease renewal terms, and host‑country regulatory approvals. Any agreement may set a template for future transactions between global asset managers and sovereign energy entities, particularly in the Gulf region. While details of the discussions are confidential, the size and strategic nature of the pipeline network suggest that a deal could shift later this year.

Investment flows in the Middle East have showed renewed strength. Saudi and Emirati stock markets climbed this week, powered by stronger service-sector indices and easing of global trade tensions. Against this backdrop, Aramco’s potential repurchase aligns with sovereign objectives to consolidate energy assets in the hands of national champions.

Should talks falter, analysts predict BlackRock may explore secondary-market sales to other infrastructure investors, or retain partial control under renegotiated terms. A phased exit or continued minority stake is also plausible, contingent on pricing, return targets, and geopolitical sensitivities.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund posted a 60 per cent plunge in net profit for 2024, even as its assets surpassed the US $1 trillion mark, the fund disclosed on 30 June. The drop came amid persistent high interest rates, inflationary pressures, and a wave of impairments tied to escalated costs and shifting operational plans.

Net income dwindled to 25.8 billion riyals, down sharply from 64.4 billion riyals in the prior year. This contrast underscored the divergence between headline growth and bottom‑line volatility within Saudi Arabia’s principal engine for economic diversification.

Assets under management rose by 18 per cent to 4.321 trillion riyals, up from 3.664 trillion riyals in 2023. The surge came largely from fresh capital injections, including transfers from oil‑linked revenues, plus appreciation in existing holdings, particularly in domestic champions such as Saudi Aramco and Saudi National Bank.

Yet, comprehensive income—an accounting measure that factors in unrealised gains and asset revaluations—tipped into negative territory, registering a 140 billion riyals loss following a gain of 138.1 billion riyals the previous year. The swing reflected deep writedowns, tied to project revaluations across the PIF’s footprint.

Monica Malik, chief economist at Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, attributed the downturn in part to recalibration of investment strategies. She highlighted how “prioritisation of some projects and the extension in the timelines of some giga projects could have been a factor for the impairments,” and pointed to rising costs as another pressure point.

Among these giga‑projects is NEOM, an ambitious urban megacity on Saudi’s Red Sea coast. Backed by hundreds of billions of dollars in PIF funding, NEOM remains central to the fund’s strategy, though its scale and timeline have been under increased scrutiny amid cost inflation and changing economic dynamics.

Cash reserves stood firm at 316 billion riyals, while group loans edged up to 570 billion riyals, signalling ongoing borrowing to propel expansions. This reflects PIF’s dual posture: aggressive investment on one hand, and debt financing on the other.

Historically, PIF has been pivotal to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 programme—Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s blueprint to reduce national dependence on oil by building world‑class tourism, tech and renewable sectors. Since 2015, the fund’s remit expanded from passive equity holdings to sovereign‑directed mega‑investments. By end‑2024, PIF had amassed over US $1 trillion in assets, bolstered by successive Aramco asset transfers.

Its investment portfolio spans global holdings—Uber, Boeing, Disney—and domestic ventures like Qiddiya, the Red Sea luxury resort and NEOM. The fund also pursued high‑profile investments, including planned stakes in Heathrow Airport and European hotel chains. Overseeing this expansion has drawn both political and governance scrutiny, reflecting complex trade‑offs under Saudi rules.

Despite today’s profit contraction, the growth in assets cements the fund’s scale and influence. Dividends from Aramco and SNB now fuel a substantial portion of PIF’s recurring income, augmenting returns from non‑oil investments.

The portfolio writedowns—particularly impairments linked to escalated project outlays—underline broader macroeconomic challenges. High global interest rates have upped the cost of capital for long‑gestating developments, while inflation has pushed construction, labour and materials costs upward. PIF’s balance sheet has borne both pressures.

Operating amid this headwind, the fund has begun recalibrating timelines and reprioritising capital deployment. Malik’s comments suggest PIF faces a complex balancing act: stewarding mega‑projects while preserving fiscal discipline. Illiquidity risk, rising debt and market exposure also feature in ongoing risk assessments.

In parallel, PIF is broadening its footprint via bond issuances and global partnerships. According to finance industry disclosures, it is preparing a seven‑year sukuk targeting US $1.25 billion in proceeds. Such moves signal evolving financing strategies that complement traditional government funding and cash reserves.

Central to this outlook is Vision 2030. Despite the profit slump, PIF retains its mandate to catalyse non‑oil economic sectors, from tourism to tech to renewable energy. Arab regional peers have pursued similar diversification, but few match PIF’s scale. The fund’s willingness to shoulder large‑scale writedowns may reflect long‑term thinking: strategic build‑out today, stabilised returns in future decades.

Global investors and markets will likely watch upcoming quarterly and full‑year data for signs of recovery or further calibrations. Rising global interest rates remain a wildcard. Additionally, cost overruns in mega‑projects may prompt sharper scrutiny and public debate about deliverables.

PIF’s holding company, chaired by the Crown Prince, retains political backing, but governance observers continue to emphasise improved transparency and oversight. The fund’s decisions now carry wider implications: not just for returns, but as a barometer for Saudi Arabia’s Long‑Term economic strategy.

Net foreign direct investment surged to SAR 22.2 billion in Q1 2025, marking a 44 per cent year‑on‑year rise, the General Authority for Statistics reported on Sunday. Though slightly down from SAR 24 billion in Q4 2024, the inflows underscore robust investor interest. Meanwhile, unemployment eased across the board, with significant gains for women and youth.

Government data show inward FDI at SAR 24 billion in Q1, a 24 per cent increase year‑on‑year but a 6 per cent dip compared to late 2024. Despite this quarterly slowdown, inflows remain well above Q1 2024’s SAR 19.4 billion. The rebound follows strategic efforts under Vision 2030, including high-profile giga‑projects in tourism, sports and entertainment and regulatory reforms aimed at boosting foreign investor confidence.

Analysts caution that current FDI levels are still far short of Saudi Arabia’s $100 billion annual target. Obstacles such as a complex legal environment and perceptions of the Kingdom as a capital exporter persist. The government has responded by conditioning state‑contract awards on regional headquarters being based locally, along with plans to overhaul investment laws to increase transparency.

On the labour front, the overall unemployment rate for people aged 15 and above dropped to 7.8 per cent in Q1, down from 8.5 per cent in Q4 2024. Among Saudi nationals, unemployment eased to 7.6 per cent, compared to 8.4 per cent in the previous quarter; male unemployment declined from 5.1 per cent to 4.7 per cent and female unemployment from 14.3 per cent to 13 per cent.

These figures follow earlier statistics showing an even lower unemployment rate among Saudi nationals: 6.3 per cent, the lowest on record, driven in part by historic falls in female joblessness, which reached 10.5 per cent. GASTAT’s labour bulletin also highlighted a rise in overall participation to 68.2 per cent, up 1.8 points from Q4 2024. Within that, Saudi male participation climbed to 66.4 per cent, while female participation rose to 36.3 per cent.

The youth labour market showed varied outcomes: unemployment among young Saudi women fell to 11.6 per cent, while male youth unemployment dropped to 11.6 per cent as well, even as their participation rate declined. Experts link these shifts to targeted labour reforms, including expanded digital employment platforms such as Jadarat, and programmes that encourage female workforce inclusion under Vision 2030.

Economic diversification is evident in the deeper GDP breakdown. Non‑oil sectors grew by 4.2 per cent in Q1, significantly outpacing oil activity, which fell by 1.4 per cent, according to GASTAT. Government services also rose by 3.2 per cent, driving overall GDP growth of 2.7 per cent year‑on‑year. These shifts highlight the evolving composition of the economy away from hydrocarbons.

The resilience in FDI and labour metrics comes amid projected fiscal pressures. Saudi Arabia is expected to run a SAR 101 billion deficit in 2025, to be funded largely through debt. Even so, credit agencies note that net public debt remains low at approximately 17 per cent of GDP, leaving room for continued borrowing.

Policy-makers point to dynamic growth in private‑sector activity and infrastructure investment as evidence of broader momentum. Nonetheless, flows remain below long‑term targets, and uncertainties linger over the pace of regulatory liberalisation and investor protections.

Combined, these indicators illustrate an economy in transition. FDI strength and labour market improvement reflect clear progress, especially on domestic policy fronts aligned with Vision 2030 goals. Yet government targets for transformative investment and full private‑sector integration remain distant, and persistent structural rigidities could slow advancement.

Moving forward, success will hinge on deepening institutional reforms—such as streamlined licensing, improved legal frameworks, and enhanced foreign equity rights—and sustaining social policies that widen labour force inclusivity, notably among women and youth. Economic forecasts anticipate moderating oil prices and slower government expenditure later in 2025, placing even greater emphasis on private capital inflows and sustainable domestic job creation.

These emerging trends offer insight into Saudi Arabia’s efforts to recalibrate its economic model—balancing fiscal constraints with bold ambitions. While the pace of change remains uneven, the current data points to structural momentum that, if sustained, could reshape the Kingdom’s economy over the remainder of the decade.

A new Qingdao Overseas Integrated Service Centre launched at the China‑Arab Business Forum in Qingdao is set to deepen commercial ties between China and the Gulf region by enhancing the current $400 billion trade corridor.

Abdulla Albasha Alnoaimi, UAE commercial attaché to China, and Zeng Zanrong, Qingdao’s municipal party secretary, formally unveiled the centre, established by SepcoIII Electric Power Construction Co and Hisense Group. Drawing on their extensive foothold in the UAE and the broader Middle East, the centre is intended to act as a bridge to support Chinese firms entering Arab markets.

At the forum, 40 projects worth $5.93 billion were signed, spanning high‑end equipment, new energy, advanced materials and next‑generation information technology. These agreements signal a deliberate shift towards elevating the technological content and sophistication of trade between the regions.

Bilateral trade between China and Arab countries reached more than $400 billion in 2024, compared to just $36.7 billion in 2004, marking a ten‑fold rise over two decades. Saudi Arabia and the UAE led these exchanges, recording $107.53 billion and $101.838 billion respectively in 2024, with the latter growing by 7.2 per cent year‑on‑year.

Mohammed Saqib, secretary‑general of the CHIMENA Business Council, emphasised the centre’s role in aligning public and private sectors to drive economic cooperation, cultural exchange and joint investment initiatives. He noted it will act through mechanisms such as overseas industrial parks, procurement matching and international exhibitions.

China’s expansion into the Gulf forms part of its broader geopolitical strategy to diversify trade alliances and reduce dependency on Western markets, especially the US. Chinese firms are now deeply involved in infrastructure development across the MENA region, including ports, industrial zones, and renewable energy projects.

The forum drew 465 multinational firms, including 135 from the Fortune Global 500 and 330 leading industry enterprises across 43 countries. Three focused matchmaking sessions brought together over 300 Chinese companies with counterparts in Egypt, the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

Co‑hosts of the event included the Qingdao municipal government, China’s Ministry of Commerce and the Shandong provincial department of commerce, signalling full institutional support and coordination.

With its strategic location in the UAE, the centre is expected to catalyse an export‑oriented alliance, supporting Chinese firms in sectors such as energy, manufacturing and new materials, as well as bolstering the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative across Gulf markets.

This initiative aligns with a historical trajectory of Sino‑Arab exchange, tracing back over two millennia via the Silk Route. Contemporary developments reflect a sharpened focus on innovation‑driven partnerships.

The unfolding dynamics underscore a growing economic interdependence between China and Gulf states. The QOISC adds an institutional anchor to sustain momentum, foster deeper investment flows, and integrate advanced technology and green energy into bilateral commerce.

However, observers caution China must continue to navigate geopolitical sensitivities, particularly in managing strategic competition with the US and ensuring sustainable and balanced partnerships that benefit local economies.

Israeli defence minister Israel Katz declared late on 24 June that he had ordered the Israel Defence Forces to resume “high‑intensity operations” against regime targets in central Tehran. The announcement followed allegations that Iran had launched missiles into Israeli territory, in what Tel Aviv described as a blatant breach of a United States‑mediated ceasefire unveiled just hours earlier by President Donald Trump.

Trump had proclaimed a “complete and total ceasefire” on Truth Social, explaining that Iran would halt strikes first, followed by Israel, in a phased arrangement ending after 24 hours. Within three hours of that declaration, Israel alleged that Iran launched missiles toward its southern regions, prompting Katz’s directive to strike key Iranian infrastructure.

Contradicting Israel’s account, Tehran’s ISNA student news agency denied firing any missiles post‑ceasefire. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier stated that Tehran would cease retaliatory actions—conditional on Israel halting operations by 04:00 Tehran time, a condition that purportedly lapsed minutes before hostilities were to pause.

President Trump, addressing the situation on social media, urged both nations to honour the agreement and warned against any violations, offering his oversight as guarantor of the pledge. His announcement followed the deployment of U.S. B‑2 bombers striking three Iranian nuclear sites, and a symbolic retaliatory missile strike from Iran against a U.S. base in Qatar—strikes reportedly calibrated to minimise escalation.

Despite conflicting claims, available evidence indicates a spike in missile exchanges. According to Reuters, Israel’s southern city of Beersheba was hit, resulting in at least four fatalities, while various townships experienced temporary power outages after sirens sounded across the region as Iranian missiles streaked overhead.

Tehran mourned significant civilian losses, with over 10 Israelis killed and more than 250 injured during Iran’s earlier onslaught, which included bombardments on central and southern Israeli regions. Meanwhile, Israel took credit for eliminating senior Iranian military personnel and striking strategic nuclear and missile infrastructure; Benjamin Netanyahu celebrated Israel’s success in degrading what he described as a dual existential threat posed by Iran’s capabilities.

Regionally, Qatar responded strongly, summoning Iran’s ambassador and condemning the attack on U.S. forces at Al Udeid Air Base as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Saudi Arabia expressed hope that all parties would uphold the ceasefire and de‑escalate.

International markets reacted positively to the ceasefire’s initial announcement. Oil prices dropped, and equities rallied on optimism that the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz might ease—although the renewed strikes quickly revived fears of a wider conflagration.

Experts scrutinise the long‑term viability of the truce. Some analysts suggest installation damage to Iran’s nuclear programme may be reversible, with Iran’s leadership determined to rebuild. Others view the U.S. use of bunker‑buster bombs and Israel’s strategic targeting of Iranian deterrents as potential deterrents that may delay a rapid resurgence.

On the political front, Trump is leveraging the declared ceasefire as a foreign‑policy milestone ahead of an imminent NATO summit. Netanyahu affirmed Israel would respond forcefully to any violations. Tehran warned that its military exercise would persist unless the bombing ended, contending that it acted to “punish Israel for its aggression until the very last minute”.

As global attention turns to negotiations, Qatar’s mediation role and U.S. involvement loom large. The deal remains tentative, with both Israel and Iran accusing each other of breaking terms, and uncertainty surrounding whether Trump’s phased ceasefire timeline will endure.

Oman will become the first Gulf Cooperation Council nation to impose a personal income tax, mandating a 5 per cent levy on individuals whose gross annual income exceeds OMR 42,000 from 1 January 2028, under Royal Decree No 56/2025. The newly enacted law, spanning 76 articles across 16 chapters, represents a historic policy shift aimed at diversifying the Sultanate’s revenue sources beyond hydrocarbons.

The Tax Authority has confirmed that this threshold renders roughly 99 per cent of the populace exempt, targeting only the top one per cent of earners. The fairness-driven approach includes deductions for education, healthcare, primary housing, zakat, charitable donations and inheritance, signalling a progressive and socially aware stance.

Finance Minister Said bin Mohammed Al‑Saqri framed the move as integral to bolstering fiscal sustainability, shielding the Sultanate from oil revenue fluctuations, and advancing Oman Vision 2040. The authority anticipates non-oil revenue will rise to 15 per cent of GDP by 2030 and 18 per cent by 2040, marking a significant realignment of economic priorities.

Preparations are well underway. Karima Mubarak Al Saadi, director of the Personal Income Tax Project, noted that the tax infrastructure—including electronic filing systems integrated with government databases—and regulatory frameworks have been established. Executive regulations are expected within a year of publication in the Official Gazette, ensuring sufficient lead‑time for implementation.

International observers see the move as part of a broader Gulf fiscal transformation. Thomas Vanhee of Aurifer Middle East Tax Consultancy commented that Oman’s decision may anticipate IMF guidance encouraging Gulf states to broaden revenue bases. While income tax may challenge the region’s historic appeal to expatriates, Gulf nations including the UAE and Saudi Arabia have already introduced VAT and corporate taxes, signalling an irreversible shift.

Analysts emphasise that the low flat rate and high exemption point strike a balance between revenue generation and retaining competitiveness. Oil revenue accounts for up to 85 per cent of Oman’s public income, and this reform is expected to reinforce fiscal buffers while maintaining social equity.

Economic research by Gulf‑based think‑tanks confirms that the tax’s fiscal impact is modest, contributing under 1 per cent of GDP initially, but holds strategic value in funding non-hydrocarbon sectors such as education, healthcare, housing and social safety nets. For investors, the tax signals enhanced fiscal resilience and potential stability in public financing.

Despite the progressive rollout and social safeguard measures, policy challenges remain. The effective administration of personal income tax will demand efficiency, public awareness and compliance. Authorities appear to have addressed this proactively, expanding staff training and preparing guidance materials for both individuals and businesses.

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a “complete and total” ceasefire between Israel and Iran, set to begin within hours, marking what he described as the end of a 12‑day war. The plan envisages Iran initiating a 12‑hour ceasefire, followed by a reciprocal Israeli hiatus, concluding with a full cessation of hostilities.

Trump’s statement on his social media platform outlined a phased process: Iran will commence the ceasefire after winding down its final missions, followed by Israel 12 hours later, and after 24 hours the war will be declared over. He praised both nations for their “stamina, courage, and intelligence” and characterised the agreement as a significant step towards lasting peace.

The announcement follows a dramatic escalation in regional tensions. Israel launched military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in response to Iran’s uranium enrichment activities. Tehran retaliated by firing up to 14 missiles at the U.S.-operated Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. While 13 were intercepted and one deviated off course, no U.S. personnel were harmed—a fact President Trump described as a “very weak response.”

Despite global concerns over escalation, including warnings from France and other Western capitals, market responses have remained muted. Oil prices dropped approximately 7% in anticipation of de‑escalation, while equity markets posted modest gains.

Though the ceasefire announcement has generated optimism, it remains unverified by Israeli or Iranian leaders. As of now, neither government has publicly confirmed their commitment to the arrangement. Al Jazeera noted the absence of official statements from both sides.

The U.S. role in brokering this agreement highlights Trump’s assertive posture. He denied prior suggestions that France’s Emmanuel Macron had brokered such a deal, countering that the ceasefire plan was “much bigger than that.” Analysts warn that trust between Israel and Iran remains fragile, requiring robust verification mechanisms and potentially third-party monitoring to sustain the fragile peace.

European diplomats, including those from France, Germany and the UK, have previously urged for de‑escalation after U.S. strikes, facilitating a clash of diplomacy and military brinkmanship. Trump has also floated the prospect of regime change in Iran under the slogan “Make Iran Great Again,” sparking concerns about the endgame and durability of U.S. involvement.

In Washington, debate has emerged regarding U.S. aims. Trump’s advisors say the administration does not seek regime change, yet the use of the slogan and his rhetoric suggests otherwise. Critics warn that pushing Iran into further isolation could spark domestic instability in Tehran.

Regions across the Gulf remained on high alert during the conflict. Airspace closures in Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait affected international travel. Qatar has since reopened its skies following coordination with regional authorities. Countries in the region—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and France included—expressed deep concern and reinforced calls for dialogue and restraint.

Security analysts note that the potential for a broader conflagration, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, persisted until the ceasefire announcement. Iran’s parliamentary body had discussed strategic deterrents, including the possibility of closing the strait, a move that could severely disrupt global oil supplies. The upcoming hours will be decisive in determining whether the ceasefire is respected or if underlying tensions reignite.

The absence of casualties on either the U.S. or Israeli side contrasts with reported losses in Iran and Israel. Israeli strikes reportedly killed several hundred Iranians, including Revolutionary Guard members, while Iran was testing its limited retaliatory capabilities.

Infrastructure damage in both nations has been notable though not crippling. On the Iranian side, Tehran’s Evin prison and Revolutionary Guard sites bore the brunt of Israeli air raids; on the Israeli side, civilian infrastructure has remained largely intact, shielded by missile defence systems such as Iron Dome.

Stock markets and global commodity prices will closely monitor the ceasefire’s implementation. Should it hold, analysts suggest stability may regain foothold and prices may further retreat. However, any violation could push markets back into turmoil.

Diplomatically, Europe appears keen to reaffirm diplomatic channels. The EU and UN are reportedly preparing statements urging verification and offering mediation. Russia and China have also urged parties to uphold the ceasefire and avoid widening the conflict.

The next 24 hours are critical. The phased ceasefire hinges on mutual restraint and credible enforcement measures. U.N. observers or allied forces may be deployed to Tehran and Tel Aviv to verify compliance. Confirmation of Iran’s opening of its airspace and Israel’s military stand‑down orders will be key signals.

Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, hosting around 10,000 U.S. and allied personnel, was struck on 23 June 2025 by a volley of short- and medium-range ballistic missiles launched by Iran in apparent retaliation for American airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. Qatar’s air defences intercepted the incoming salvo, reported as six missiles by Iran and fourteen by U.S. sources, with no casualties or significant damage recorded.

Tehran described the strike as a calibrated response, matching the number of missiles to bombs used in the U.S. assault on Natanz, Fordow and Esfahan, suggesting a bid to avoid civilian harm. Iranian state media dubbed the action “Operation Glad Tidings of Victory” and stressed it was carried out away from populated areas. U.S. President Donald Trump, characterising the barrage as “very weak,” acknowledged that Iran provided advance notice, enabling effective interception and preventing casualties.

Qatar issued a forceful denunciation, condemning the barrage as a “flagrant violation” of its sovereignty and international law. Dr Majed bin Mohammed Al Ansari, spokesperson for Qatar’s Foreign Ministry, warned that the country reserves the right to respond proportionally and reiterated calls for a return to genuine diplomacy. Qatar Airways temporarily suspended flights amid the airspace closure, and India’s embassy in Doha advised nationals to remain cautious amid the unfolding tensions.

The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia also condemned the violence. The UAE described the missiles as a breach of Qatari sovereignty and called for an immediate halt to military escalation. Riyadh echoed this stance, expressing full support for Qatar and branding the strike “unjustifiable,” warning of broader destabilisation. The Arab League, Jordan, Bahrain and Oman joined the chorus, denouncing the attack and urging restraint.

Western capitals emphasised caution. France and Germany condemned the missile salvo but underscored the necessity of diplomacy. The United Nations and European Union called for urgent de-escalatory measures and a return to negotiations, with António Guterres warning of the risk of “regional conflagration”. Beijing and Moscow echoed appeals for a diplomatic resolution.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated that Iran would not succumb to aggression and that its missile barrage equalled the U.S. assault. Tehran also hinted at further measures if U.S. actions persist. Meanwhile, Israel unleashed its most extensive air campaign yet on Tehran, striking sites including Evin Prison and Fordow enrichment facility.

The strikes on Qatar and also U.S. bases in Iraq—though unconfirmed beyond Qatar—have prompted airspace closures over Gulf nations including Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE. Commercial carriers like IndiGo and Air India Express issued advisories or rerouted flights, contributing to widening disruptions in travel.

Global financial markets reacted nervously, with oil prices briefly spiking over fears of disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for global energy shipments. The International Atomic Energy Agency, meanwhile, voiced anxiety about the security of Iran’s nuclear sites following the U.S. bombardment.

Analysts suggest Iran’s approach was designed to recalibrate the balance of deterrence without provoking full-scale war. The matched missile count, pre-warning, and focus on a remote military target indicate a calculated effort to signal strength while avoiding mass casualties.

Diplomats across Europe, the U.N. and the Gulf pressed for an immediate halt to further strikes and for major powers to step up mediation. Qatar, a longstanding facilitator of regional talks, is uniquely positioned to spearhead efforts. Both Iran and the U.S. have acknowledged potential for dialogue: Trump spoke of the prospect of “peace and harmony,” echoing Tehran’s assertions that the strike completed its “symbolic” objectives.

But with tensions now inflamed between Iran, Israel and the U.S., and Gulf states on alert, diplomatic channels face a critical juncture. Any miscalculation could unleash renewed conflict across the region.

Etihad Rail and Abu Dhabi authorities have formalised a strategic partnership aimed at aligning rail infrastructure planning with the emirate’s broader development goals. The initiative centres on coordinated knowledge exchange around studies, designs, engineering, and strategic development, supporting the integration of Etihad Rail’s projects into Abu Dhabi’s urban and economic landscape.

The agreement, endorsed by Sheikh Theyab bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Chairman of Etihad Rail, underscores the importance of a fully integrated transport ecosystem. Shadi Malak, CEO of Etihad Rail, confirmed that the collaboration spans infrastructure studies, engineering tender layouts and development planning to ensure rail projects dovetail seamlessly with Abu Dhabi’s urban expansion.

This forms part of a broader wave of recent MoUs signed by Etihad Rail during the Global Rail 2024 conference. Memorandums were inked with a range of international entities—from transport‑focused to tech innovators—to enrich its projects. These include partnerships with Presight AI for AI-driven operational insights; RITES Ltd and South Korea’s KNR/KORAIL on engineering and construction expertise; Austria’s WKÖ for planning cooperation; L&T Technology Services for establishing a national mobility innovation centre; as well as technical alliances with IronLev, Nevomo, Hitachi and Singapore’s SBS Transit.

One high‑profile partnership saw Etihad Rail team up with COSCO’s CSP Abu Dhabi CFS—a key freight terminal operator—under an MoU to bolster multimodal connectivity, enhance logistics flows via rail, and reduce CO₂ emissions, aligning with Abu Dhabi’s Net Zero by 2050 target.

The newly reinforced Abu Dhabi alignment focuses on future passenger services and urban sprawl. While Etihad Rail Stage One and Stage Two freight operations stretch more than 900 km across the UAE, passenger services are under preparation. The Abu Dhabi–Dubai high‑speed link, capable of up to 350 km/h journeys in as little as 30 minutes, has moved through tendering and design finalisation phases. Six passenger stations—including Reem, Saadiyat and Yas Islands plus two in Dubai—are to be integrated with metro and bus networks.

Experts highlight the economic uplift from such rail integration. Mohammed Al Shehhi, Chief Projects Officer, noted that the Abu Dhabi–Dubai high‑speed route could add AED 145 billion to GDP over fifty years, enhancing social cohesion and sustainable mobility.

The collaboration also intersects with major sustainability initiatives. The Ghuweifat freight terminal, which handles cargo from the Saudi border, has been solarised in partnership with Masdar and EDF’s Emerge JV—a project designed to cover 85 % of its power needs, saving over 8 500 tons of CO₂. Rail freight services aim to cut emissions in road transport by 21 % annually by 2050—roughly 8.2 million tonnes of CO₂ per year.

On the regional integration front, Etihad Rail, Oman Rail and Mubadala launched Hafeet Rail—a 300 km link through Al Ain to the port of Sohar. With a US $3 billion contract signed in April 2024, trains are expected to run at 200 km/h and connect Abu Dhabi to Omani ports in just over 100 minutes.

Etihad Rail’s development timeline follows a phased rollout. Stage One became fully operational for freight in January 2016. Stage Two launched freight services in February 2023, completing a 900 km network. Passenger services are yet to be scheduled publicly, though station planning and tendering details are advancing rapidly.

Engineer analysts suggest this partnership framework marks a pivotal shift. By embedding knowledge exchange—covering everything from preliminary studies and engineering specifications to strategic transit modelling—Etihad Rail looks to avoid siloed project delivery. Instead, it positions rail development as core to Abu Dhabi’s urban vision, supported by a holistic transport network and sustainable infrastructure policy.

Public sector observers note the involvement of ADQ, through Etihad Rail, aligns with Emirate-level economic strategies such as Abu Dhabi Economic Vision 2030 and broader UAE Vision 2021. The rail strategy supports logistics, tourism growth, environmental goals, and inter-emirate connectivity. It is built to support freight services now and evolve into passenger transport, high-speed travel, and international rail links.

An Abu Dhabi infrastructure planner stated: “This marks a meaningful move from planning rail as a standalone corridor to delivering integrated mobility that ties directly into the emirate’s urban, economic and environmental objectives.”

Rail specialists emphasise digital and technical partnerships as vital. Collaborations with AI, mobility-as-a-service, maglev and autonomous rail firms reflect Etihad Rail’s push toward a technology-driven, future-ready rail network.