News related to
agreement

Polymarket, the world’s largest blockchain-based prediction market platform, is on the verge of completing a funding round exceeding $200 million that would value the company at over $1 billion. The strategic investment reflects growing investor confidence in forecasting platforms as tools for real-time insights and market intelligence.

The company, founded in 2020 by Shayne Coplan and headquartered in New York, has previously secured $70 million across Series A and B rounds led by General Catalyst, Founders Fund, alongside participation from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. That capital helped Polymarket scale its operations offshore, particularly following regulatory setbacks in the United States, where it withdrew services under pressure from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Sources indicate the new investment round will build on these foundations, raising upwards of $200 million and propelling Polymarket into unicorn status with a valuation north of $1 billion. Those close to the transaction describe a diverse syndicate of venture capital firms, strategic investors and high-profile figures from the crypto and financial sectors, though official names are yet to be disclosed.

Polymarket’s appeal lies in its novel combination of decentralised finance, crowd-sourced wisdom and smart contract automation. The platform allows participants to trade on real-world events—ranging from elections and policy outcomes to entertainment and economic indicators—by buying and selling shares reflective of outcome probabilities. Transactions occur using USDC on Polygon, ensuring on-chain settlement and transparency.

Trading volumes attest to the platform’s influence. In August 2024 alone, Polymarket processed approximately $472 million in trades, with political markets—especially those related to the US presidential election—accounting for nearly $1 billion in wagers by November 2024. Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund highlighted its trust in Polymarket’s market intelligence: “checking Polymarket when breaking news happens has become a habit”.

That compelling performance comes amid regulatory headwinds. Polymarket has barred US users since reaching a settlement with the CFTC in early 2022, which included a US$1.4 million fine and the appointment of former CFTC chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo to its advisory board. These changes aimed to address compliance concerns as the platform expanded internationally. More recently, the FBI reportedly raided Coplan’s home in autumn 2024 as part of an investigation into whether US-based activity violated these agreements.

Despite these challenges, Polymarket has continued to deepen its appeal. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has publicly supported the broader application of prediction markets, terming them pioneers in “Info Finance,” an area he believes can enhance journalism, governance and scientific transparency. Polymarket’s data is now cited within Bloomberg’s Terminal services, offering institutional investors fresh analytical layers based on global betting dynamics.

The potential $200 million funding round is expected to include an allocation of token warrants enabling investors to participate in a future token issuance by Polymarket. Earlier reporting by CoinDesk and The Defiant in late 2024 highlighted a $50 million interim funding plan tied to a utility token offering, intended to integrate with or supplant the UMA oracle dispute-resolution system. That mechanism would allow users—or token holders—to validate market outcomes, an evolution that could expand Polymarket’s governance and on-chain autonomy.

Market observers view this token strategy as a logical advancement. Rising volumes and user engagement on election forecasts have revealed limitations in relying solely on external oracles; introducing a native token could decentralise verification and cement Polymarket’s position in the governance of its own markets.

Emerging trends suggest Polymarket is transitioning from an insurgent, crypto-native prediction exchange to a mainstream information infrastructure. Its user base now spans political analysts, financial professionals and retail traders. The recent partnership with X integrates Polymarket’s probabilistic feeds into social media dynamics, allowing users to access market sentiment in real-time alongside breaking news.

Yet questions over regulatory alignment remain. The CFTC is reportedly examining off-shore platforms that permit US bettor access, and lawmakers are considering broader prohibitions on event-based derivatives. The fallout from the 2024 FBI inquiry adds a layer of legal uncertainty, even as Polymarket navigates regulatory environments in Europe and Asia, where its platform has faced access restrictions from gambling regulators in Belgium, Poland, Singapore and France.

As Polymarket nears completion of its landmark funding round, it stands at a crossroads defined by opportunity and scrutiny. A valuation exceeding $1 billion would underscore investor conviction in its model, but unlocking the full potential of prediction markets may depend as much on regulatory clarity as on capital infusion.

Israeli defence minister Israel Katz declared late on 24 June that he had ordered the Israel Defence Forces to resume “high‑intensity operations” against regime targets in central Tehran. The announcement followed allegations that Iran had launched missiles into Israeli territory, in what Tel Aviv described as a blatant breach of a United States‑mediated ceasefire unveiled just hours earlier by President Donald Trump.

Trump had proclaimed a “complete and total ceasefire” on Truth Social, explaining that Iran would halt strikes first, followed by Israel, in a phased arrangement ending after 24 hours. Within three hours of that declaration, Israel alleged that Iran launched missiles toward its southern regions, prompting Katz’s directive to strike key Iranian infrastructure.

Contradicting Israel’s account, Tehran’s ISNA student news agency denied firing any missiles post‑ceasefire. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier stated that Tehran would cease retaliatory actions—conditional on Israel halting operations by 04:00 Tehran time, a condition that purportedly lapsed minutes before hostilities were to pause.

President Trump, addressing the situation on social media, urged both nations to honour the agreement and warned against any violations, offering his oversight as guarantor of the pledge. His announcement followed the deployment of U.S. B‑2 bombers striking three Iranian nuclear sites, and a symbolic retaliatory missile strike from Iran against a U.S. base in Qatar—strikes reportedly calibrated to minimise escalation.

Despite conflicting claims, available evidence indicates a spike in missile exchanges. According to Reuters, Israel’s southern city of Beersheba was hit, resulting in at least four fatalities, while various townships experienced temporary power outages after sirens sounded across the region as Iranian missiles streaked overhead.

Tehran mourned significant civilian losses, with over 10 Israelis killed and more than 250 injured during Iran’s earlier onslaught, which included bombardments on central and southern Israeli regions. Meanwhile, Israel took credit for eliminating senior Iranian military personnel and striking strategic nuclear and missile infrastructure; Benjamin Netanyahu celebrated Israel’s success in degrading what he described as a dual existential threat posed by Iran’s capabilities.

Regionally, Qatar responded strongly, summoning Iran’s ambassador and condemning the attack on U.S. forces at Al Udeid Air Base as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Saudi Arabia expressed hope that all parties would uphold the ceasefire and de‑escalate.

International markets reacted positively to the ceasefire’s initial announcement. Oil prices dropped, and equities rallied on optimism that the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz might ease—although the renewed strikes quickly revived fears of a wider conflagration.

Experts scrutinise the long‑term viability of the truce. Some analysts suggest installation damage to Iran’s nuclear programme may be reversible, with Iran’s leadership determined to rebuild. Others view the U.S. use of bunker‑buster bombs and Israel’s strategic targeting of Iranian deterrents as potential deterrents that may delay a rapid resurgence.

On the political front, Trump is leveraging the declared ceasefire as a foreign‑policy milestone ahead of an imminent NATO summit. Netanyahu affirmed Israel would respond forcefully to any violations. Tehran warned that its military exercise would persist unless the bombing ended, contending that it acted to “punish Israel for its aggression until the very last minute”.

As global attention turns to negotiations, Qatar’s mediation role and U.S. involvement loom large. The deal remains tentative, with both Israel and Iran accusing each other of breaking terms, and uncertainty surrounding whether Trump’s phased ceasefire timeline will endure.

Donald Trump proclaimed a full ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, marking what he described as the end of a “12‑day war” that forced millions from Tehran and sparked grave fears of escalation. He posted on Truth Social that Iran would halt its operations at midnight ET, followed by Israel twelve hours later, culminating in a 24‑hour cessation of hostilities.

Trump touted the move as a diplomatic breakthrough, congratulating “both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end” the conflict. He asserted that the agreement was brokered in discussions with Prime Minister Netanyahu and through U.S. envoys in dialogue with Tehran, with Qatar playing a key intermediary role.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, echoed that Tehran’s forces stood down at 4 a.m. Tehran time if Israel ceased its attacks by then, though he clarified that a final decision on halting military operations was pending. Israel’s military has yet to formally acknowledge the ceasefire, and missile alerts and strikes were still reported over Tel Aviv, Beersheba and the Golan Heights in the hours following the announcement.

The conflict began on 13 June when Israel launched airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure, including sites near Natanz, Isfahan and Tehran. That response, which Israeli authorities described as necessary to counter an alleged Iranian march towards nuclear weapons capability, included the destruction of centrifuge material and the deaths of senior Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with waves of missiles and drones aimed at Israeli territory; Israel intercepted many of them, but civilian casualties were reported in Beersheba and Tel Aviv.

The conflict widened when the United States joined with bunker‑buster strikes on Iranian underground nuclear facilities over the weekend, prompting Iran to retaliate by targeting the U.S. air base at Al Udeid in Qatar. The attack caused no casualties, and Trump later thanked Iran for the “early notice,” calling it a “very weak response”.

Though Trump dismissed European diplomatic efforts as ineffective, he warned that U.S. involvement remained a distinct possibility if Iran escalated further, positioning American strikes solely against nuclear targets. Internal Israeli pressure also rose; Prime Minister Netanyahu reportedly instructed ministers to refrain from public commentary as military activity approached a pause.

Humanitarian fallout during this period has been acute. Over 650 Iranians have died, according to Iranian health data, including civilians, and over 200 Israeli military and civilian fatalities have been reported. Tehran saw large-scale evacuations as power and internet access faltered.

International bodies raised alarms over the bombardment of nuclear facilities. The International Atomic Energy Agency cautioned against striking enrichment sites due to risks of radiological contamination. Legal experts also voiced concerns that the strikes on civilian infrastructure—including hospitals and residential neighborhoods—could constitute violations under international humanitarian law.

Despite the ceasefire declaration, uncertainty remains. Iran’s foreign minister warned that if Israeli attacks persisted past 4 a.m. Tehran time, hostilities could resume. Similarly, Israeli officials reported continued launcher of missiles from Iran, demonstrating that the ceasefire may be fragile.

Regional and global reactions have been varied. Qatar’s prime minister was credited with facilitating Iran’s acceptance of the U.S.-proposed ceasefire. European negotiators, meanwhile, expressed frustration that efforts in Geneva had produced little movement before hostilities intensified. Both Russia and China urged restraint and urged full de‑escalation.

Markets responded positively to the ceasefire announcement, reflecting investor hopes for regional stability, yet the humanitarian toll and legal implications—the destruction of nuclear infrastructure, civilian casualties, and potential violations of international law—leave an ambiguous legacy for a war that surged in intensity over just under two weeks. The path ahead now hinges on whether both nations uphold the phased withdrawal and open room for diplomatic resolution amid deep mistrust.

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a “complete and total” ceasefire between Israel and Iran, set to begin within hours, marking what he described as the end of a 12‑day war. The plan envisages Iran initiating a 12‑hour ceasefire, followed by a reciprocal Israeli hiatus, concluding with a full cessation of hostilities.

Trump’s statement on his social media platform outlined a phased process: Iran will commence the ceasefire after winding down its final missions, followed by Israel 12 hours later, and after 24 hours the war will be declared over. He praised both nations for their “stamina, courage, and intelligence” and characterised the agreement as a significant step towards lasting peace.

The announcement follows a dramatic escalation in regional tensions. Israel launched military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in response to Iran’s uranium enrichment activities. Tehran retaliated by firing up to 14 missiles at the U.S.-operated Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. While 13 were intercepted and one deviated off course, no U.S. personnel were harmed—a fact President Trump described as a “very weak response.”

Despite global concerns over escalation, including warnings from France and other Western capitals, market responses have remained muted. Oil prices dropped approximately 7% in anticipation of de‑escalation, while equity markets posted modest gains.

Though the ceasefire announcement has generated optimism, it remains unverified by Israeli or Iranian leaders. As of now, neither government has publicly confirmed their commitment to the arrangement. Al Jazeera noted the absence of official statements from both sides.

The U.S. role in brokering this agreement highlights Trump’s assertive posture. He denied prior suggestions that France’s Emmanuel Macron had brokered such a deal, countering that the ceasefire plan was “much bigger than that.” Analysts warn that trust between Israel and Iran remains fragile, requiring robust verification mechanisms and potentially third-party monitoring to sustain the fragile peace.

European diplomats, including those from France, Germany and the UK, have previously urged for de‑escalation after U.S. strikes, facilitating a clash of diplomacy and military brinkmanship. Trump has also floated the prospect of regime change in Iran under the slogan “Make Iran Great Again,” sparking concerns about the endgame and durability of U.S. involvement.

In Washington, debate has emerged regarding U.S. aims. Trump’s advisors say the administration does not seek regime change, yet the use of the slogan and his rhetoric suggests otherwise. Critics warn that pushing Iran into further isolation could spark domestic instability in Tehran.

Regions across the Gulf remained on high alert during the conflict. Airspace closures in Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait affected international travel. Qatar has since reopened its skies following coordination with regional authorities. Countries in the region—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and France included—expressed deep concern and reinforced calls for dialogue and restraint.

Security analysts note that the potential for a broader conflagration, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, persisted until the ceasefire announcement. Iran’s parliamentary body had discussed strategic deterrents, including the possibility of closing the strait, a move that could severely disrupt global oil supplies. The upcoming hours will be decisive in determining whether the ceasefire is respected or if underlying tensions reignite.

The absence of casualties on either the U.S. or Israeli side contrasts with reported losses in Iran and Israel. Israeli strikes reportedly killed several hundred Iranians, including Revolutionary Guard members, while Iran was testing its limited retaliatory capabilities.

Infrastructure damage in both nations has been notable though not crippling. On the Iranian side, Tehran’s Evin prison and Revolutionary Guard sites bore the brunt of Israeli air raids; on the Israeli side, civilian infrastructure has remained largely intact, shielded by missile defence systems such as Iron Dome.

Stock markets and global commodity prices will closely monitor the ceasefire’s implementation. Should it hold, analysts suggest stability may regain foothold and prices may further retreat. However, any violation could push markets back into turmoil.

Diplomatically, Europe appears keen to reaffirm diplomatic channels. The EU and UN are reportedly preparing statements urging verification and offering mediation. Russia and China have also urged parties to uphold the ceasefire and avoid widening the conflict.

The next 24 hours are critical. The phased ceasefire hinges on mutual restraint and credible enforcement measures. U.N. observers or allied forces may be deployed to Tehran and Tel Aviv to verify compliance. Confirmation of Iran’s opening of its airspace and Israel’s military stand‑down orders will be key signals.

Etihad Rail and Abu Dhabi authorities have formalised a strategic partnership aimed at aligning rail infrastructure planning with the emirate’s broader development goals. The initiative centres on coordinated knowledge exchange around studies, designs, engineering, and strategic development, supporting the integration of Etihad Rail’s projects into Abu Dhabi’s urban and economic landscape.

The agreement, endorsed by Sheikh Theyab bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Chairman of Etihad Rail, underscores the importance of a fully integrated transport ecosystem. Shadi Malak, CEO of Etihad Rail, confirmed that the collaboration spans infrastructure studies, engineering tender layouts and development planning to ensure rail projects dovetail seamlessly with Abu Dhabi’s urban expansion.

This forms part of a broader wave of recent MoUs signed by Etihad Rail during the Global Rail 2024 conference. Memorandums were inked with a range of international entities—from transport‑focused to tech innovators—to enrich its projects. These include partnerships with Presight AI for AI-driven operational insights; RITES Ltd and South Korea’s KNR/KORAIL on engineering and construction expertise; Austria’s WKÖ for planning cooperation; L&T Technology Services for establishing a national mobility innovation centre; as well as technical alliances with IronLev, Nevomo, Hitachi and Singapore’s SBS Transit.

One high‑profile partnership saw Etihad Rail team up with COSCO’s CSP Abu Dhabi CFS—a key freight terminal operator—under an MoU to bolster multimodal connectivity, enhance logistics flows via rail, and reduce CO₂ emissions, aligning with Abu Dhabi’s Net Zero by 2050 target.

The newly reinforced Abu Dhabi alignment focuses on future passenger services and urban sprawl. While Etihad Rail Stage One and Stage Two freight operations stretch more than 900 km across the UAE, passenger services are under preparation. The Abu Dhabi–Dubai high‑speed link, capable of up to 350 km/h journeys in as little as 30 minutes, has moved through tendering and design finalisation phases. Six passenger stations—including Reem, Saadiyat and Yas Islands plus two in Dubai—are to be integrated with metro and bus networks.

Experts highlight the economic uplift from such rail integration. Mohammed Al Shehhi, Chief Projects Officer, noted that the Abu Dhabi–Dubai high‑speed route could add AED 145 billion to GDP over fifty years, enhancing social cohesion and sustainable mobility.

The collaboration also intersects with major sustainability initiatives. The Ghuweifat freight terminal, which handles cargo from the Saudi border, has been solarised in partnership with Masdar and EDF’s Emerge JV—a project designed to cover 85 % of its power needs, saving over 8 500 tons of CO₂. Rail freight services aim to cut emissions in road transport by 21 % annually by 2050—roughly 8.2 million tonnes of CO₂ per year.

On the regional integration front, Etihad Rail, Oman Rail and Mubadala launched Hafeet Rail—a 300 km link through Al Ain to the port of Sohar. With a US $3 billion contract signed in April 2024, trains are expected to run at 200 km/h and connect Abu Dhabi to Omani ports in just over 100 minutes.

Etihad Rail’s development timeline follows a phased rollout. Stage One became fully operational for freight in January 2016. Stage Two launched freight services in February 2023, completing a 900 km network. Passenger services are yet to be scheduled publicly, though station planning and tendering details are advancing rapidly.

Engineer analysts suggest this partnership framework marks a pivotal shift. By embedding knowledge exchange—covering everything from preliminary studies and engineering specifications to strategic transit modelling—Etihad Rail looks to avoid siloed project delivery. Instead, it positions rail development as core to Abu Dhabi’s urban vision, supported by a holistic transport network and sustainable infrastructure policy.

Public sector observers note the involvement of ADQ, through Etihad Rail, aligns with Emirate-level economic strategies such as Abu Dhabi Economic Vision 2030 and broader UAE Vision 2021. The rail strategy supports logistics, tourism growth, environmental goals, and inter-emirate connectivity. It is built to support freight services now and evolve into passenger transport, high-speed travel, and international rail links.

An Abu Dhabi infrastructure planner stated: “This marks a meaningful move from planning rail as a standalone corridor to delivering integrated mobility that ties directly into the emirate’s urban, economic and environmental objectives.”

Rail specialists emphasise digital and technical partnerships as vital. Collaborations with AI, mobility-as-a-service, maglev and autonomous rail firms reflect Etihad Rail’s push toward a technology-driven, future-ready rail network.

The Saudi Central Bank has introduced sweeping reforms in the rules governing credit-card issuance and operation, aiming to reduce consumer costs, bolster transparency and align with global standards. The changes include mandatory fee notifications, reduced cash withdrawal charges, capped international transaction fees and improved disclosures.

SAMA will implement these updates within 30 to 90 days. Key changes include a requirement for issuers to send SMS alerts before any fee or term modification, allowing cardholders a 14-day window to cancel agreements without penalty under the updated terms. E-wallet top-ups using credit cards will now incur no charges, a move intended to incentivise digital payments.

Cash withdrawals of SR2,500 or less will carry a maximum fee of 3% of the transaction value; those of SR2,500 or more are capped at SR75. Previously, cash advance fees applied sharply until SR5,000 with a flat SR75, and beyond that 3%, up to SR300—making the new cap notably more favourable for larger withdrawals. International purchases will now attract a clear 2% fee of the transaction amount.

A notable enhancement allows customers to deposit amounts beyond their credit limit and withdraw them at any point without additional charges, enhancing flexibility and consumer agency. Account statements must now be issued via SMS at least 25 days before payment, detailing balances, due dates and fees. Immediate notifications must follow any credit-card transaction, including details such as merchant, amount and remaining limit. Issuers are also required to provide pre‑transaction tools for estimating international charges and reward benefits.

Repayment provisions maintain consumer safeguards: a 25-day minimum grace period is mandated before term costs apply. The rules prohibit levying additional fees for full balance payments and outlining clear terms for minimum payments and their implications.

These reforms are underpinned by standardised disclosure templates for fees and benefits, inclusive of promotional terms—a step towards consistency across the market. Issuers must emphasise APR, term costs and expiration timelines for rewards or promotions, with SMS reminders 14 days in advance.

SAMA’s emphasis on mandatory due diligence and creditworthiness checks prior to card issuance is reinforced under the new framework. Criteria now include explicit customer consent via authenticated channels, formal credit record assessments and eligibility conditions aligned with industry best practices.

Procedures for supplementary cards, default reporting and dispute resolution have also been clarified. For example, the minimum repayment remains 5% of the due balance, and any default procedures must include consumer advisory services before legal or collection measures begin.

SMS has been designated the primary channel for disclosures, with issuers obliged to inform customers of account activity, fee changes and promotional developments. Financial institutions must adhere to SAMA‑specified notification templates to promote uniformity and clarity.

According to a senior official within SAMA, the goal is to “establish minimum requirements to promote disclosure, transparency and fair practices, as well as to limit credit risk.” Industry reaction has been generally positive. Analysts from regional banks suggest the rules will “enhance consumer protection while supporting digital payment growth.” Critics, however, note potential implementation challenges—particularly in updating existing systems to align with stricter notification and compliance requirements.

The timing reflects SAMA’s broader strategy to modernise the financial sector and accelerate digital payments as part of Saudi Vision 2030. A 2020 directive mandated real‑time notifications for debit card and e-wallet transactions, laying foundational infrastructure for today’s enhanced SMS regime. Collaboration with global payment networks—such as Visa, MasterCard and American Express—has helped shape caps on international and cash advance fees.

Banks and fintech firms are now preparing compliance roadmaps. One major lender has initiated system-wide updates to include the new SMS templates, fee calculators and balance‑flexibility features. Industry trade bodies are urging transparency in implementation timelines to ensure consumers are well informed ahead of the rollout.

As SAMA positions Saudi Arabia’s credit‑card framework at par with international best practice, key areas to monitor include transparency in third‑party charges, enforcement mechanisms for non-compliant issuers, and feedback from consumer‑protection advocates.

Abu Dhabi’s state‑owned oil giant ADNOC has unveiled plans to escalate its U.S. energy investments six‑fold over the next decade, targeting a total of $440 billion. Speaking in Washington on 17 June, Sultan al‑Jaber, ADNOC Chief Executive and UAE Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, declared that the American market is “not just a priority; it is an investment imperative” for the company’s global expansion.

Al‑Jaber underlined the urgency of the move, emphasising that artificial intelligence represents a “once‑in‑a‑generation investment opportunity.” He pointed out that the growth of data centres driven by AI will demand substantial power— “The next stage of evolution” in energy consumption, he said. The planned investments will span a wide spectrum: anchor stakes in the largest liquefied natural gas facility in Texas, petrochemical plants, and the deployment of 5.5 gigawatts of renewable energy paired with storage systems “from coast to coast”.

ADNOC’s international investment arm, XRG, is cementing its presence with a new Washington office, aimed at steering these high‑stakes ventures. XRG has already struck a deal with Occidental’s 1PointFive for a direct air capture project in Texas, with potential investment reaching $500 million. Additional widescale cooperation includes agreements to develop U.S. gas, LNG, specialty chemicals and energy infrastructure.

The announcement synchronises with a broader bilateral strategy: in March, senior UAE officials committed to a ten‑year, $1.4 trillion investment framework in the U.S., covering sectors such as AI, energy, semiconductors and manufacturing. As part of that pact, U.S. companies agreed to invest $60 billion in UAE energy assets. The XRG–Occidental partnership, as well as other collaborations involving ExxonMobil, Japanese firms Inpex and JODCO, is expected to expand capacity at Abu Dhabi’s major offshore oil field, Upper Zakum.

At the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Washington, al‑Jaber addressed the broader challenge of powering AI, stating that U.S. energy infrastructure must undergo a “system‑wide shift” to keep pace. He highlighted the need to hyperscale energy supply—from gas, renewables with storage and nuclear—to meet the projected requirement of 50–150 GW of new capacity just in the next five years. He warned against prematurely retiring existing power plants, advocating instead for grid modernisation and rapid permitting for new infrastructure.

Environmental groups have voiced concern that the surge in AI‑driven energy demand could lead to rising carbon emissions unless clean energy is prioritised. In response, al‑Jaber suggested that AI could, in fact, offer solutions—optimising grid efficiency and managing load fluctuations, effectively “unlocking its own energy challenge”.

The energy‑AI summit ENACT, hosted by XRG and MGX alongside the Atlantic Council, gathered leading figures from across the energy, tech and finance sectors. Delegates, including representatives from Exxon, OpenAI and BP, discussed mid‑ and long‑term strategies to address the escalating power needs of hyperscale data centres.

These developments are set against a backdrop of rising instability in the Middle East, where al‑Jaber cautioned that energy remains a “cornerstone of peace, stability and prosperity,” signalling that the new chapter of collaboration aims to underpin global energy security.

For the U.S., the influx of investment promises a host of benefits: large‑scale infrastructure expansion, high‑task employment, and reinforced energy resilience. Projects under the UAE umbrella—from LNG plants to hydrogen and carbon capture initiatives—are poised to generate thousands of jobs, while U.S. energy firms gain access to new development avenues both at home and back in the Gulf.

Yet questions remain. Policy experts stress that realisation of al‑Jaber’s ambitious vision will depend heavily on ensuring timely regulatory approvals and creating an effective risk environment for private capital. Moreover, balancing fossil fuel commitments with the drive toward decarbonisation will require clear direction from both governments and industry stakeholders.

Vietnam’s Techsmart Telecom, the Institute of Information Technology and CyberSecurity, UAE’s Venom Foundation and Abu Dhabi’s GS Fund have signed a memorandum of understanding to advance a sovereign digital finance framework. The scheme centres on a national Data Centre, supervised stablecoin issuance, cross-border settlement infrastructure, cybersecurity protocols and fintech training—a landmark convergence of telecom, blockchain, finance and security sectors.

The agreement mandates Venom Foundation’s sovereign-grade Layer‑0 blockchain be deployed in Vietnam. The foundation, already liaising with central banks across Southeast Asia—including Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam—will integrate ISO 20022 messaging, on‑chain KYC/AML, real-time settlements and asset tokenisation capabilities into the system. GS Fund will spearhead the data centre’s construction under a stable legal and economic regime, while IITCS tackles regulatory framework, compliance and talent development, and Techsmart manages connectivity and integration.

Work in the initial phase, set for the next 12 months, will prioritise the technical architecture, legal foundations and national infrastructure planning. Vietnam’s demographic profile—a young, technologically literate population—and its expanding cross-border fintech activities are seen as key enablers for asset tokenisation, according to Venom Foundation. Dr Hoang Phuoc Thuan of IITCS highlighted Resolution 57’s role in connecting sovereign data ambitions with e‑government and AI development.

This public–private partnership reflects Vietnam’s Digital Infrastructure Strategy, which targets universal fibre, extensive 5G coverage and advanced data centre roll-out by 2030. Venom’s Layer‑0 blockchain—already piloted in the Philippines with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas—cements institutional-grade readiness for programmable finance and asset digitisation.

Regulatory progress has been underway since March’s Prime Ministerial directive, with the Ministry of Finance and State Bank of Vietnam tasked to propose a Digital Technology Infrastructure law, introduce regulated sandboxes and pilot a crypto framework by May 2025. Amid this, Vietnam’s digital asset market has grown substantially—around 17 million citizens currently hold crypto assets valued at over US $100 billion—placing the country in the top five worldwide for individual interest and top three in trading volume.

Issues remain unresolved: incomplete guidelines on exchange licensing, asset categorisation and customer protection have placed Vietnam on the Financial Action Task Force’s grey list. Integrating blockchain with conventional banking operations—spanning accounting, risk management and cybersecurity—also poses significant implementation hurdles.

Further reinforcing policy alignment, the Vietnam Blockchain Association and One Mount Group—members of the VBA—have pledged between US $200 million and US $500 million to establish a sovereign Layer‑1 blockchain, complying with Prime Ministerial Directive 05/CT‑TTg.

The final vision foresees multi-year rollout phases extending beyond initial legal and technical milestones to encompass digital payments, reduced reliance on physical cash, strengthened cybersecurity via distributed ledgers, and expanded fintech education for government and private sectors under IITCS guidance.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered the cancellation of a decades‑long indemnity that shields Israeli banks when processing shekel transactions for Palestinian counterparts, a move poised to disrupt salaries, imports and basic services across the West Bank and Gaza.

The directive, issued on 10 June 2025, halts a waiver that permitted Israeli financial institutions to facilitate payments to the Palestinian Authority and local customers without fear of legal consequences. Analysts warn this could sever Palestinian banks’ vital access to the larger Israeli banking system.

Palestinian Monetary Authority officials cautioned that this severance would seriously impede operations such as payments for food, fuel, electricity and water. In 2023 alone, around 53 billion shekels—equivalent to $15.2 billion—passed through Palestinian banking corridors. The revocation of the indemnity risks plunging the territories into a fragile cash‑only system, heightening exposure to theft, fraud and illicit activity.

Smotrich’s decision follows sanctions by the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway imposing asset freezes and travel bans on him and National Security Minister Itamar Ben‑Gvir, citing their roles in incitement and human rights abuses in the West Bank and Gaza. Smotrich maintains the waiver withdrawal is a justified response to what he terms the Palestinian Authority’s “delegitimisation campaign” against Israel.

For decades, Palestinian banking operated without central‑bank autonomy or national currency. Reliance on Israeli shekels and correspondent banking agreements has been critical. International voices—including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, G7 officials and the UN—have repeatedly warned that ending this arrangement could trigger a humanitarian crisis and violate international law.

Local analysts predict the measures will exacerbate an already deteriorating economic landscape. Kristin Ronzi of intelligence firm Rane Network said abolishing this financial collaboration will “impede the Palestinian Authority’s ability to import basic, essential goods such as food and fuel,” likely deepening economic hardship and undermining public sentiment.

The Palestinian banking system, which exceeds 100 % of GDP, is particularly vulnerable to spill‑over effects from Gaza into the West Bank, according to IMF data. The termination of the waiver is feared to amplify credit constraints on private and public sectors alike, risking reduced lending, increased borrowing costs, and even defaults.

International stakeholders, including the US and G7, had pressed for short‑term extensions of the indemnity. Those appeals often hinged on warnings that a collapse of Palestinian financial networks would destabilise trade, delay crucial services, and potentially fuel militant groups reliant on cash economies.

Smotrich is known for his hardline positions: he has previously withheld Israeli-tax clearance revenues and blocked aid in retaliation for moves supportive of Palestinian statehood. In May 2025, he warned publicly that Gaza “will be totally destroyed,” vowing to push Palestinians toward resettlement in other countries.

Within Israel, there is evident friction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and some coalition members support Smotrich, but others fear political and economic backlash—particularly amid international outrage and concern over deepening the Gaza violence. The policy must still pass through Israel’s security cabinet before implementation begins.

Across Palestinian chambers in Ramallah and Gaza City, there is growing anxiety. Authorities are scrambling to negotiate with donors, international NGOs and Middle Eastern allies, in hopes of constructing contingency plans. Proposed measures include alternative cash corridors, increased use of digital currencies, and humanitarian exemptions—but none currently matches the scale of the existing system.

Economists warn the broader consequences of this rupture—the Palestinian economy has already lost billions amid conflict. Since October 2023, Gaza’s economy shrank by 61 %, the West Bank by 24 %, and joblessness soared to around 57 % across both territories. Analysts fear the banking clamp‑down could invert years of fragile recovery efforts, worsening poverty and political instability.