News related to
Mid Term

Net foreign direct investment surged to SAR 22.2 billion in Q1 2025, marking a 44 per cent year‑on‑year rise, the General Authority for Statistics reported on Sunday. Though slightly down from SAR 24 billion in Q4 2024, the inflows underscore robust investor interest. Meanwhile, unemployment eased across the board, with significant gains for women and youth.

Government data show inward FDI at SAR 24 billion in Q1, a 24 per cent increase year‑on‑year but a 6 per cent dip compared to late 2024. Despite this quarterly slowdown, inflows remain well above Q1 2024’s SAR 19.4 billion. The rebound follows strategic efforts under Vision 2030, including high-profile giga‑projects in tourism, sports and entertainment and regulatory reforms aimed at boosting foreign investor confidence.

Analysts caution that current FDI levels are still far short of Saudi Arabia’s $100 billion annual target. Obstacles such as a complex legal environment and perceptions of the Kingdom as a capital exporter persist. The government has responded by conditioning state‑contract awards on regional headquarters being based locally, along with plans to overhaul investment laws to increase transparency.

On the labour front, the overall unemployment rate for people aged 15 and above dropped to 7.8 per cent in Q1, down from 8.5 per cent in Q4 2024. Among Saudi nationals, unemployment eased to 7.6 per cent, compared to 8.4 per cent in the previous quarter; male unemployment declined from 5.1 per cent to 4.7 per cent and female unemployment from 14.3 per cent to 13 per cent.

These figures follow earlier statistics showing an even lower unemployment rate among Saudi nationals: 6.3 per cent, the lowest on record, driven in part by historic falls in female joblessness, which reached 10.5 per cent. GASTAT’s labour bulletin also highlighted a rise in overall participation to 68.2 per cent, up 1.8 points from Q4 2024. Within that, Saudi male participation climbed to 66.4 per cent, while female participation rose to 36.3 per cent.

The youth labour market showed varied outcomes: unemployment among young Saudi women fell to 11.6 per cent, while male youth unemployment dropped to 11.6 per cent as well, even as their participation rate declined. Experts link these shifts to targeted labour reforms, including expanded digital employment platforms such as Jadarat, and programmes that encourage female workforce inclusion under Vision 2030.

Economic diversification is evident in the deeper GDP breakdown. Non‑oil sectors grew by 4.2 per cent in Q1, significantly outpacing oil activity, which fell by 1.4 per cent, according to GASTAT. Government services also rose by 3.2 per cent, driving overall GDP growth of 2.7 per cent year‑on‑year. These shifts highlight the evolving composition of the economy away from hydrocarbons.

The resilience in FDI and labour metrics comes amid projected fiscal pressures. Saudi Arabia is expected to run a SAR 101 billion deficit in 2025, to be funded largely through debt. Even so, credit agencies note that net public debt remains low at approximately 17 per cent of GDP, leaving room for continued borrowing.

Policy-makers point to dynamic growth in private‑sector activity and infrastructure investment as evidence of broader momentum. Nonetheless, flows remain below long‑term targets, and uncertainties linger over the pace of regulatory liberalisation and investor protections.

Combined, these indicators illustrate an economy in transition. FDI strength and labour market improvement reflect clear progress, especially on domestic policy fronts aligned with Vision 2030 goals. Yet government targets for transformative investment and full private‑sector integration remain distant, and persistent structural rigidities could slow advancement.

Moving forward, success will hinge on deepening institutional reforms—such as streamlined licensing, improved legal frameworks, and enhanced foreign equity rights—and sustaining social policies that widen labour force inclusivity, notably among women and youth. Economic forecasts anticipate moderating oil prices and slower government expenditure later in 2025, placing even greater emphasis on private capital inflows and sustainable domestic job creation.

These emerging trends offer insight into Saudi Arabia’s efforts to recalibrate its economic model—balancing fiscal constraints with bold ambitions. While the pace of change remains uneven, the current data points to structural momentum that, if sustained, could reshape the Kingdom’s economy over the remainder of the decade.

The U.S. dollar has slumped by more than 10 per cent year‑to‑date, marking its most severe first‑half decline since the mid‑1980s, as global investors pull back from dollar‑denominated assets amid doubts over U.S. economic policy and rising interest in alternatives such as cryptocurrencies.

Institutional investors across Europe and Asia are leading a broad sell‑off. European pension funds and insurers have slashed dollar‑asset exposure to levels unseen since 2022, primarily through equity divestment, while Asian bondholders have been unwinding fixed‑income positions.

Market watchers identify multiple bearish drivers: weakening Federal Reserve credibility under the spectre of political interference, dovish statements signalling potential rate cuts, and concerns over President Trump’s tariff posture and mounting debt. These factors have undercut confidence in the dollar’s role as the premier global reserve asset.

Declining yields on U.S. Treasuries have narrowed their appeal, prompting asset shifts toward Europe and emerging markets and feeding a broader investor rotation away from dollar‑centric investments. Cash strategists at Bank of America report that the net underweight position on the dollar is the most significant in two decades, signalling widespread repositioning.

Despite periodic reprieves, market technicals remain weak. The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, trading around the high‑90s, broke key support levels, triggering technical patterns that suggest further downside unless a strong reversal emerges.

The dollar’s weakness is also fueling a surge in alternative assets. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have rallied, with analysts highlighting an inverse correlation to the dollar’s performance. Gold and select equities in Europe and Asia have benefited from the reallocation of capital.

Echoes of the mid‑1980s Plaza Accord era are notable, when coordinated efforts led to a sharp devaluation of the dollar. However, experts caution that the current environment reflects deeper structural trends: geopolitical uncertainties, shifting reserve currency strategies, and Asia’s growing role in capital flows.

Some analysts argue that short‑term technical bounce possibilities exist, especially if U.S. economic indicators outperform or geopolitical tensions rekindle risk‑off flows. Yet, the prevailing consensus points to a prolonged adjustment period, as “short dollar” bets remain deeply entrenched among fund managers.

The dollar’s slide has implications beyond currency markets. Weaker dollar conditions typically ease financial constraints for emerging economies with dollar-denominated debt, support commodity prices, and influence global trade balances. Conversely, U.S. consumers may experience elevated import costs.

Attention now shifts to key catalysts: upcoming Fed commentary, U.S. inflation and employment data, and whether the administration proceeds with proposed tariffs or investment taxes that could further unsettle international investor sentiment.

Beirut’s landscape, battered by the 14‑month Hezbollah–Israel war, is set for a critical transformation as the World Bank green‑lights a US$250 million financing package to support urgent restoration and rubble management. Dubbed the Lebanon Emergency Assistance Project, this initiative marks the initial phase of a US$1 billion, government‑led framework aimed at breathing life back into vital public infrastructure and essential services.

Damage and needs assessments conducted between 8 October 2023 and 20 December 2024 estimate total conflict losses at US$7.2 billion, with an overarching reconstruction requirement of US$11 billion. Of this, approximately US$1.1 billion pertains to infrastructure across transport, water, energy, municipal services, education and healthcare – the precise sectors that LEAP will target for immediate interventions.

Jean‑Christophe Carret, the World Bank’s Middle East director, described LEAP’s design as “a credible vehicle for development partners to align their support, alongside continued progress on the Government’s reform agenda, and maximise collective impact in support of Lebanon’s recovery and long‑term reconstruction”. The financing will fund rapid repairs to lifeline services, sustainable clearance of rubble prioritising recycling, and initial design and environmental studies for longer‑term rebuilding.

By adopting a data‑driven, area‑based prioritisation endorsed by the Council of Ministers, LEAP aims to balance speed with social and economic impact in the worst‑affected regions. To ensure accountability and effective delivery, Lebanon has initiated reforms within the Council for Development and Reconstruction, including the appointment of a fully functional board and streamlined processes consistent with international emergency‑response standards.

Operational oversight will be bolstered by an international private‑sector engineering firm, responsible for compliance monitoring across technical, environmental, fiduciary and AML/CFT requirements. Implementation rests under the strategic guidance of the Prime Minister’s Office, with the Ministry of Public Works and Transport leading execution and the Ministry of Environment overseeing social and environmental safeguards, especially debris handling.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam welcomed the funding as “a key step in reconstruction… reinforcing recovery efforts within a state‑led framework and paving the way for much‑needed additional financing”.

The World Bank has previously confirmed that this initial contribution is part of a US$1 billion scalable fund, with $250 million already committed and plans for donor contributions to fill the remaining $750 million. Lebanon has already secured preliminary approval to raise the World Bank loan to $400 million, signalling growing momentum for the broader rehabilitation agenda.

LEAP emerges at a juncture when Lebanon, in the grip of one of its most severe financial crises in modern history, is balancing a recovery from war with deep‑rooted economic collapse. Nearly three‑quarters of its population live in poverty, the currency has collapsed by over 90 % since 2019, and public services have all but collapsed. The project’s prioritisation of transparency, environmental best practice, and governance reform offers a fresh test of Lebanon’s capacity to channel international finance into tangible, equitable recovery.

Meanwhile, the World Bank is coordinating with multilateral and bilateral donors, aligning its initial funding with evolving Lebanese reforms. The ultimate success of LEAP depends not only on reconstruction dollars, but on effective institutional stewardship—a challenge Lebanon’s government has pledged to embrace.

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that American and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, following a concerted military campaign that he claims has effectively neutralised key Iranian enrichment facilities. The announcement came at the NATO summit in The Hague.

Trump defended the use of bunker-busting bombs against the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, asserting they had been “obliterated” and describing the bombing campaign as a decisive blow to Iran’s nuclear programme. He struck a triumphant tone, crediting the strikes with hastening the end of the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, though he expressed reservations about formalising a diplomatic agreement: “We may sign an agreement. I don’t know, to me, I don’t think it’s that necessary,” he told reporters.

U.S. intelligence assessments, however, diverge on the scale of success. A preliminary report from the Defence Intelligence Agency concluded the setbacks to Iran’s nuclear efforts might be limited to a matter of months, not years. CIA Director John Ratcliffe affirmed that the programme had been “severely damaged” but stopped short of declaring it destroyed. Israeli officials estimated the setbacks to be multi‑year, while the International Atomic Energy Agency emphasised uncertainties over Iran’s stockpile and called for robust inspections.

Diplomatic activity has meanwhile resumed. This U.S.–Iran meeting will follow six rounds of indirect talks mediated by Oman and Italy, which collapsed in mid‑June as the military confrontation intensified. Earlier this week, European envoys from the E‑3—France, Germany and the UK—engaged in direct negotiations in Geneva with Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Those discussions aimed to bridge differences after stalled U.S. efforts.

White House special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated red‑line U.S. stipulations ahead of next week’s meeting: Tehran must renounce nuclear weaponisation and accept restrictions on uranium enrichment. He noted the U.S. is open to crafting a comprehensive peace framework, building on what Trump described as a de‑escalation following “a victory for everybody”.

From Tehran, Iranian officials have not confirmed next week’s meeting but emphasised national security. The Iranian parliament accelerated a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, pending guarantees for the safety of nuclear infrastructure targeted in the strikes. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accused the IAEA of failing to condemn the U.S. attack. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged renewed inspections to clarify the status of enriched uranium moved before the bombings.

Regional and global actors are also weighing in. France has called for robust diplomacy to carve a sustained peace path. China has echoed the call for diplomatic restraint. Israel hailed the strikes as a critical setback to Iran’s programme; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed Trump’s strong posture and emphasised the need to keep pressure on Tehran.

Analysts note the gravity of waging diplomacy in the shadow of military action. One specialist observed that while bombings may degrade enrichment infrastructure, they can complicate trust and cooperation needed for inspections and verification. Moreover, uncertainty lingers over the status of highly enriched uranium caches. Rebuilding diplomatic channels will require assurances, reciprocal transparency, and a mutual understanding of consequences.

Trump has warned that if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, the U.S. is prepared to act again: “Sure,” he said when asked about further strikes. Yet the pendulum has swung toward a blend of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement.

As next week’s talks approach, key questions remain: who will represent each side, where the dialogue will occur, and whether the focus will be solely nuclear constraints or broader regional stability. White House administration officials have yet to disclose details, but the U.S. envoy confirmed Washington’s intent is to establish a framework that could replace the 2015 agreement.

Trump also signalled openness to exploring a bilateral relationship beyond nuclear confines: “We’ll end up having something of a relationship with Iran,” he said, as long as Tehran adheres to non‑weaponisation terms.

As the diplomatic window opens under the spectre of military force, the world watches to see whether this fragile blend of coercion and conciliation can unfold into a sustainable agreement—one that might ensure Iran never pursues nuclear weapons and stabilises a volatile region.