News related to
financial

Santos has granted a six‑week exclusive due‑diligence period to a consortium led by Abu Dhabi’s National Oil Company, signalling serious progress towards its A$36.5 billion takeover proposal.

The consortium, comprising ADNOC’s investment arm XRG, Abu Dhabi Development Holding Company and private equity investor Carlyle, has placed an all‑cash offer of A$8.89 per share—representing a roughly 28 per cent premium on Santos’s previous closing price. Santos’s board is prepared to endorse the deal, pending satisfactory outcomes from due diligence, no better competing bids and approval by an independent fairness expert.

Should the offer proceed, it would mark Australia’s largest-ever all‑cash corporate takeover and rank among the top three transactions nationally—holding an enterprise value near A$36.4 billion.

The acquisition targets Santos’s LNG assets, including Australia’s Gladstone and Darwin facilities, plus substantial interests in Papua New Guinea’s LNG project and the forthcoming Papua LNG development. XRG aims to build an integrated gas and LNG portfolio capable of delivering 20–25 million tonnes annually by 2035.

Adhering to regulatory requirements, the consortium has signed confidentiality agreements and secured exclusive negotiating rights for this due‑diligence phase.

Santos’s management is forecasting a binding scheme implementation agreement before enabling a shareholder vote needing at least 75 per cent support, as per Australian scheme‑of‑arrangement rules. Shareholder approval will depend on a legal and financial assessment of the offer’s fairness.

While the consortium has pledged to maintain Santos’s Adelaide headquarters, preserve local employment, and continue momentum on major projects like the Barossa LNG development and Moomba carbon‑capture initiative, significant regulatory scrutiny lies ahead.

National oversight will involve multiple bodies: Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board, ACCC, ASIC, and National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator; Papua New Guinea’s Securities and Competition commissions; and the US Committee on Foreign Investment due to Santos’s cross-border interests.

Analysts caution that the central risk is FIRB rejection, given Santos’s control over critical gas infrastructure. Potential remedies, like spinning off assets, may invite legal and decommissioning complexities.

South Australian state officials, including Premier Peter Malinauskas and Energy Minister Tom Koutsantonis, have highlighted the importance of protecting domestic jobs, the company’s base, and energy security—leveraging recent legislative powers to oversee licence transfers.

The political backdrop complicates matters, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers in caretaker mode ahead of a potential election. His decision will pivot on FIRB advice and the national interest implications.

Santos has endured pressures in recent years, including a near‑16 per cent drop in annual profit and a 41 per cent dividend cut in 2024. It also abandoned merger negotiations with Woodside that would have created an A$80 billion energy entity.

The consortium’s revised offer follows an initial A$8.00 bid in March, raised to A$8.60 later that month, and now stands at A$8.89—reflecting sustained negotiations and valuation uplifts. Should the agreement proceed, final receipt of regulatory and shareholder clearances could extend into early 2026.

This transaction underscores ADNOC’s growing appetite for strategic LNG assets in the Asia‑Pacific region and exemplifies broader Middle Eastern investment trends in global energy infrastructure. The outcome will influence the balance of power in Australia’s evolving LNG market and set significant precedents for future foreign investment decisions.

Bo Hines, digital asset policy adviser at the White House, confirmed that the United States is actively constructing the infrastructure necessary to support a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. This initiative follows the executive order signed by President Trump on 6 March 2025, which established both a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a broader Digital Asset Stockpile. Hines highlighted that federal agencies have completed accounting for Bitcoin holdings, marking a pivotal step in consolidating treasury-held assets and enabling future acquisitions.

Hines explained that although the order does not compel public disclosure of cryptocurrency holdings, the Treasury may choose to publish a report voluntarily. He emphasised the administration’s inclination to increase government Bitcoin holdings in a budget-neutral way—likely by reallocating existing seized assets or surplus resources—without burdening taxpayers.

The crack team in Washington, including Hines and figures such as David Sacks, are framing Bitcoin as “digital gold”. They contend that, like traditional gold reserves, Bitcoin offers a durable store of value with no central issuer, making it strategically significant for national financial security. Experts point out that such an asset could act as a hedge against inflation and strengthen financial sovereignty, though critics warn of its volatility and speculative nature.

Infrastructure efforts have focused on establishing systems for secure custody, interagency transfer, and real-time accounting of government-held Bitcoin. Hines noted that laying this groundwork is essential before scaling up acquisitions. These efforts reflect a growing shift from regulatory wariness to strategic embrace of digital assets in U.S. policymaking.

Congress is also moving ahead with supporting legislation. The GENIUS Act, jointly advanced by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Tim Scott, is expected to be introduced before the August recess, while further crypto market structure legislation is targeted for completion by September. Hines pointed to this timeline during a session with the senators, underscoring a coordinated push to regulate and support the digital asset space.

State governments and private corporations have already launched Bitcoin-reserve-like initiatives, but the federal programme marks the first national-level effort. This move may be partly inspired by El Salvador’s state-level Bitcoin holding, a model that Hines reportedly examined during conversations with President Nayib Bukele.

Opposition to the federal SBR persists. Economists from the University of Chicago survey unanimously rejected borrowing to acquire crypto assets, citing the speculative nature of Bitcoin. International finance officials—with the European Central Bank in particular—warn that embracing Bitcoin could undermine conventional reserve strategies and monetary stability.

The initiative’s long-term success hinges on robust regulatory clarity. The executive order tasked agencies with full crypto asset accounting and mandated that the Treasury explore budget-neutral acquisition strategies, potentially reallocating portions of gold reserves. These moves aim to balance innovation with fiscal prudence.

As infrastructure construction progresses, the Treasury’s potential publication of federal Bitcoin holdings could signal a new era of transparency and mainstreaming of digital assets in public balance sheets. For stakeholders across government and finance, the outcomes of legislative drafts in the Senate and House will be watched closely.

Dubai has been chosen to host SIBOS in 2029, affirming its standing as a global nexus in financial services. The selection reflects growing confidence in its role as a strategic bridge in international banking, marking the beginning of SWIFT’s new hosting rotation featuring emerging financial hubs.

SWIFT—holder of SIBOS, an annual forum for payments, securities, cash management and trade—has scheduled the conference in Frankfurt, Miami, Singapore, and Paris, with Dubai confirmed for 2029. This shift inaugurates a four-year rotation that now includes key regions such as the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and Asia, signalling intent to broaden engagement beyond traditional centres.

This move underscores Dubai’s appeal, anchored in the growth of DIFC, which now hosts nearly 7,000 firms, including the region’s fintech core. SWIFT’s Rosemary Stone emphasised that expanding SIBOS to diverse locations will lend fresh perspectives vital amid accelerating technological shifts and growing fragmentation risks. SWIFT saw record traffic last year, and the conference consistently draws over 10,000 delegates.

UAE Banks Federation and supporting bodies—including DIFC, DWTC, DET and CBUAE—have been credited for bringing SIBOS back to the UAE after its inaugural MENA appearance in 2013. UBF chairman Abdulaziz Al‑Ghurair highlighted that hosting SIBOS 2029 recognises the UAE’s leadership in digital payments innovation and its dedication to payment security and efficiency under CBUAE guidance.

UBF director‑general Jamal Saleh noted that the federation’s National SWIFT User Group, launched in 2021, along with the region’s first SWIFT training centre, have built a strong skill base in payments protocols. He said the bid award demonstrates “global recognition of the UAE’s achievements in payments using advanced technologies under CBUAE’s guidance”.

DIFC’s rapid development since 2004 has turned Dubai into SWIFT’s “Gateway to Africa”, strategically connecting Europe, Asia and Africa. This position enhances Dubai’s role within SWIFT’s network of over 11,500 institutions across more than 200 countries.

Planners are expected to leverage SIBOS’s platform to demonstrate regional innovations, including national payment system strategies, fintech growth, and cyber‑security frameworks. The event offers a showcase for the UAE’s ambitions to expand financial inclusion, digital infrastructure, and regulatory maturity.

The SIBOS win also supports the federal strategy unveiled by the Central Bank in 2019 to enhance customer experience through secure, innovative payment mechanisms. Observers suggest the conference will spotlight initiatives such as real‑time payment, cross‑border settlement solutions, and cloud‑based financial services.

By setting 2029 in Dubai, SWIFT signals that emerging financial ecosystems are not only capable but essential hosts. The planned rotation to include regions beyond the traditional triad marks a pivot in SWIFT’s approach, prioritising breadth of perspective as the global banking system navigates fragmentation.

UBF and its partners have committed to delivering a polished event, guided by rising standards in event production and stakeholder integration. With backing from SWIFT, CBUAE and government tourism authorities, organisers expect delegates to gain both technical insights and policy‑driven dialogue on future‑proofing global finance.

The U.S. dollar has slumped by more than 10 per cent year‑to‑date, marking its most severe first‑half decline since the mid‑1980s, as global investors pull back from dollar‑denominated assets amid doubts over U.S. economic policy and rising interest in alternatives such as cryptocurrencies.

Institutional investors across Europe and Asia are leading a broad sell‑off. European pension funds and insurers have slashed dollar‑asset exposure to levels unseen since 2022, primarily through equity divestment, while Asian bondholders have been unwinding fixed‑income positions.

Market watchers identify multiple bearish drivers: weakening Federal Reserve credibility under the spectre of political interference, dovish statements signalling potential rate cuts, and concerns over President Trump’s tariff posture and mounting debt. These factors have undercut confidence in the dollar’s role as the premier global reserve asset.

Declining yields on U.S. Treasuries have narrowed their appeal, prompting asset shifts toward Europe and emerging markets and feeding a broader investor rotation away from dollar‑centric investments. Cash strategists at Bank of America report that the net underweight position on the dollar is the most significant in two decades, signalling widespread repositioning.

Despite periodic reprieves, market technicals remain weak. The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, trading around the high‑90s, broke key support levels, triggering technical patterns that suggest further downside unless a strong reversal emerges.

The dollar’s weakness is also fueling a surge in alternative assets. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have rallied, with analysts highlighting an inverse correlation to the dollar’s performance. Gold and select equities in Europe and Asia have benefited from the reallocation of capital.

Echoes of the mid‑1980s Plaza Accord era are notable, when coordinated efforts led to a sharp devaluation of the dollar. However, experts caution that the current environment reflects deeper structural trends: geopolitical uncertainties, shifting reserve currency strategies, and Asia’s growing role in capital flows.

Some analysts argue that short‑term technical bounce possibilities exist, especially if U.S. economic indicators outperform or geopolitical tensions rekindle risk‑off flows. Yet, the prevailing consensus points to a prolonged adjustment period, as “short dollar” bets remain deeply entrenched among fund managers.

The dollar’s slide has implications beyond currency markets. Weaker dollar conditions typically ease financial constraints for emerging economies with dollar-denominated debt, support commodity prices, and influence global trade balances. Conversely, U.S. consumers may experience elevated import costs.

Attention now shifts to key catalysts: upcoming Fed commentary, U.S. inflation and employment data, and whether the administration proceeds with proposed tariffs or investment taxes that could further unsettle international investor sentiment.

U.S. lawmakers have advanced the GENIUS Act, a federal bill setting strict requirements for stablecoin issuers that could significantly challenge Tether’s dominance. The legislation mandates full backing with cash or U.S. Treasuries, monthly audits by registered firms, transparency of reserves, anti-money laundering safeguards and U.S. registration for issuers with over $10 billion in circulation. Circle’s USDC stands to gain, while Tether’s model faces serious scrutiny if it intends to access U.S. markets.

Tether currently holds approximately $155 billion in USDT tokens, backed in part by volatile assets such as Bitcoin and gold—as well as commercial paper and loans. It discloses reserves via quarterly attestations, though it has never undergone a full independent audit, despite promises since 2017. In contrast, the GENIUS Act requires liquidity in U.S.-based financial institutions and audited transparency certified by company executives, holding them personally liable.

Experts warn that Tether now faces a strategic choice: overhaul its reserve holdings, comply with audits and potentially register under U.S. regulations—or abandon ambitions in the U.S. and pivot towards offshore markets. After relocating its corporate headquarters to El Salvador, Tether appears poised to leverage regulatory gaps via reciprocal agreements—though critics argue this is unlikely to satisfy U.S. authorities.

Steve Gannon, a lawyer specialising in digital assets, suggested that Tether is unlikely to enter U.S. markets until regulations are finalised, as adaptation would require extensive investment in compliance infrastructure. CoinDesk analysis emphasises that foreign issuers could qualify only if regulated by approved jurisdictions and maintain U.S.-based reserves, with oversight from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

By contrast, Circle is well-positioned. USDC is fully backed by cash and Treasury bills, audited monthly and issued by a U.S.-based firm. Following the Senate’s approval of the GENIUS Act, Circle’s share price surged, reflecting investor confidence in its compliance-readiness.

The GENIUS Act also seeks to tighten anti-money laundering and counter-terror financing protocols by integrating stablecoins under the Bank Secrecy Act, with monthly certifications and criminal penalties for lapses. It includes explicit restrictions on stablecoin issuance by lawmakers and their families.

Critics have flagged potential loopholes, warning that offshore entities like Tether could continue servicing U.S. customers through decentralised exchanges—sidestepping rigorous Elm Salvador or other offshore jurisdictions. The Senate bill also bans stablecoins from offering interest, limiting yield-bearing models favoured by some existing issuers.

On financial markets, increased demand from compliant issuers is expected to boost U.S. Treasury purchases. Currently, around $200 billion of assets backing stablecoins are held in Treasuries and repos. Even a modest uptick in USDC issuance could drive multibillion-dollar incremental purchases. A recent study found Tether holds nearly 1.6% of all U.S. Treasury bills, contributing to yield compression equivalent to tens of billions in annual government savings.

Yet uncertainty remains. The GENIUS Act must clear the House and be signed into law, with possible amendments—especially regarding foreign issuance pressures and scope of AML provisions. Senate Banking Committee Democrats have warned of national security risks if the bill doesn’t close offshore loopholes, fearing illicit finance actors could exploit weakly regulated channels.

Tether’s CEO Paolo Ardoino has signalled exploration of a U.S.-compliant stablecoin variant, which would align reserves and governance with federal standards. However, no official timeline has been provided.

Stablecoin proponents say the GENIUS Act brings much‑needed clarity, potentially paving the way for mainstream adoption and institutional participation. Yet critics fear regulatory shortcuts may invite private stablecoins into a system without equal access for central bank digital currencies.

The stakes are high. Tether’s strategic response will shape the competitive landscape. Will it meet U.S. standards or cede space to compliant rivals like Circle? The passage of the GENIUS Act may mark a turning point in crypto policy and redefine stablecoin leadership.

Crypto exchange Kraken has secured a Markets in Crypto‑Assets licence from the Central Bank of Ireland, granting it regulated crypto services access across all 30 member states of the European Economic Area. This licence builds on its existing authorisations: an electronic money institution licence obtained in 2023 and a Markets in Financial Instruments Directive authorisation achieved in February 2025.

The MiCA framework, effective since late 2024, aims to harmonise digital asset regulation across the EU. Kraken’s approval via Ireland enables it to “passport” services continental‑wide—streamlining compliance with unified standards on consumer protection, transparency and oversight.

Co‑CEO Arjun Sethi described the licence as a “powerful signal” of Kraken’s dedication to “responsible innovation” and noted the company’s multi‑year work to meet the Central Bank of Ireland’s rigorous regulatory bar.

Since launching its BTC/EUR pair in 2013, Kraken has built extensive euro‑denominated liquidity and registered as a Virtual Asset Service Provider across key European jurisdictions: Ireland, Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain. The platform now reports euro trades account for approximately 17.5 per cent of its spot‑crypto volume.

Kraken joins a cohort of major exchanges – Coinbase, OKX, Crypto.com, Bybit and Bitstamp – that have pursued MiCA licences, emphasising the growing strategic importance of regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, stablecoin issuer Tether has declined to register its USDT product under MiCA, leading some exchanges to delist the asset.

The EU authorisation coincides with Kraken’s evolution in traditional finance. After securing the MiFID licence via a Cyprus‑based entity, it launched regulated crypto derivatives in February and acquired futures platform NinjaTrader earlier in 2025. Its 2023 EMI licence complements partnerships with Mastercard and embed‑as‑a‑service offerings like Kraken Embed through Dutch neobank bunq.

Kraken’s dual strategy spans jurisdictions: while embracing EU regulatory frameworks, the firm also relocated its global headquarters to Wyoming, citing the state’s crypto‑friendly stance. In the US, it recently avoided a legal challenge when the Securities and Exchange Commission dropped a 2023 lawsuit alleging operations as an unregistered exchange.

The MiCA authorisation equips Kraken to roll out regulated spot trading, derivatives and payments across Europe. That expansion responds to heightened demand among retail, institutional and professional users seeking compliance assurance. Kraken’s approach sets a template for crypto platforms navigating legal plurality ─ positioning Ireland not simply as a licensor but as a blueprint for public‑private collaboration in digital finance.

European policymakers have lauded MiCA’s entry, describing it as the most comprehensive global regulatory regime for digital assets. Kraken’s success demonstrates the potential of these structures to stabilise and mature the sector—but also signals a competitive divide between jurisdictions embracing innovation and those lagging.

Beirut’s landscape, battered by the 14‑month Hezbollah–Israel war, is set for a critical transformation as the World Bank green‑lights a US$250 million financing package to support urgent restoration and rubble management. Dubbed the Lebanon Emergency Assistance Project, this initiative marks the initial phase of a US$1 billion, government‑led framework aimed at breathing life back into vital public infrastructure and essential services.

Damage and needs assessments conducted between 8 October 2023 and 20 December 2024 estimate total conflict losses at US$7.2 billion, with an overarching reconstruction requirement of US$11 billion. Of this, approximately US$1.1 billion pertains to infrastructure across transport, water, energy, municipal services, education and healthcare – the precise sectors that LEAP will target for immediate interventions.

Jean‑Christophe Carret, the World Bank’s Middle East director, described LEAP’s design as “a credible vehicle for development partners to align their support, alongside continued progress on the Government’s reform agenda, and maximise collective impact in support of Lebanon’s recovery and long‑term reconstruction”. The financing will fund rapid repairs to lifeline services, sustainable clearance of rubble prioritising recycling, and initial design and environmental studies for longer‑term rebuilding.

By adopting a data‑driven, area‑based prioritisation endorsed by the Council of Ministers, LEAP aims to balance speed with social and economic impact in the worst‑affected regions. To ensure accountability and effective delivery, Lebanon has initiated reforms within the Council for Development and Reconstruction, including the appointment of a fully functional board and streamlined processes consistent with international emergency‑response standards.

Operational oversight will be bolstered by an international private‑sector engineering firm, responsible for compliance monitoring across technical, environmental, fiduciary and AML/CFT requirements. Implementation rests under the strategic guidance of the Prime Minister’s Office, with the Ministry of Public Works and Transport leading execution and the Ministry of Environment overseeing social and environmental safeguards, especially debris handling.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam welcomed the funding as “a key step in reconstruction… reinforcing recovery efforts within a state‑led framework and paving the way for much‑needed additional financing”.

The World Bank has previously confirmed that this initial contribution is part of a US$1 billion scalable fund, with $250 million already committed and plans for donor contributions to fill the remaining $750 million. Lebanon has already secured preliminary approval to raise the World Bank loan to $400 million, signalling growing momentum for the broader rehabilitation agenda.

LEAP emerges at a juncture when Lebanon, in the grip of one of its most severe financial crises in modern history, is balancing a recovery from war with deep‑rooted economic collapse. Nearly three‑quarters of its population live in poverty, the currency has collapsed by over 90 % since 2019, and public services have all but collapsed. The project’s prioritisation of transparency, environmental best practice, and governance reform offers a fresh test of Lebanon’s capacity to channel international finance into tangible, equitable recovery.

Meanwhile, the World Bank is coordinating with multilateral and bilateral donors, aligning its initial funding with evolving Lebanese reforms. The ultimate success of LEAP depends not only on reconstruction dollars, but on effective institutional stewardship—a challenge Lebanon’s government has pledged to embrace.

Tether chief executive Paolo Ardoino has pledged to catapult the company into the position of the world’s leading Bitcoin miner by the end of 2025, asserting that crypto‑mining is key to safeguarding its $10 billion‑plus Bitcoin reserves. He outlined a sweeping strategy centred on large‑scale investment in mining and energy infrastructure across Latin America.

Ardoino said Tether has already channelled upwards of $2 billion into mining and energy systems and is now accelerating deployment. While the company’s precise hash‑rate remains confidential, executives emphasise that their investment reflects both scale and strategic intent. The mining push forms part of a broader financial architecture designed to secure the firm’s Bitcoin holdings and further embed it within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The announcement emerged at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, where Ardoino noted Tether’s robust earnings—reporting a $13 billion profit in 2024—and a sizeable portfolio of U.S. Treasuries. He revealed the firm holds more than 100,000 BTC and hinted that the mining operation will leverage renewable energy sources supporting its underlying reserves.

Tether is concurrently preparing to open‑source its Bitcoin Mining Operating System, which the company says will democratise mining by enabling participants ranging from individual Raspberry Pi setups to large‑scale farms to connect into secure point‑to‑point networks. The move is intended to broaden participation, enhance resilience of the Bitcoin network, and solidify Tether’s position as a leader in infrastructure innovation.

Energy infrastructure forms a crucial part of Tether’s strategy. Ardoino highlighted investments across Latin America in renewable energy projects, including substantial commitments in Uruguay and El Salvador, where Tether relocated its headquarters and backs geothermal initiatives through a project known as Volcano Energy. These investments reflect a dual focus: securing clean, reliable power for mining and contributing to regional energy resilience.

The strategic rationale centres on mitigating the risks of holding large Bitcoin reserves. Mining, Ardoino explained, provides not only operational control but also reinforces financial sovereignty, anchoring assets within a secured blockchain‑based ecosystem. By internalising hash‑rate and power sources, Tether aims to shield its holdings from external dependency and volatility.

Security considerations have informed the launch of MOS. As a decentralised architecture, the system allows devices to operate without reliance on central servers, reducing vulnerability to single‑point failures or third‑party disruptions. Looking ahead, Tether plans to integrate artificial‑intelligence tools into MOS to monitor performance and optimise operations in real time.

Tether’s move into open‑source mining software dovetails with its broader tech ambitions. Ardoino introduced QVAC, an AI platform that uses non‑custodial wallets, and unveiled plans for a Bitcoin‑centric wallet developed with Rumble. These projects underscore Tether’s strategy to embed Bitcoin deeper into digital finance and expand its ecosystem services.

Market observers note that Tether’s mining ambition places it in direct competition with publicly traded mining firms. Although exact hashrate figures are absent, the scale of investment and reserve holdings suggest that surpassing existing miners is credible by late 2025. Tracking progress will require scrutiny of deployment timelines and performance metrics, which Tether has declined to specify.

Financial analysts regard Tether’s diversified asset approach—spanning Bitcoin, gold and U.S. Treasuries—as a deliberate hedge strategy. The large Bitcoin reserves, reportedly worth over $10 billion, alongside substantial gold and treasury holdings, underpin a multifaceted capital structure. By converting passive holdings into active mining assets, Tether aims to generate operational yield and enhance asset security.

Critics of large‑scale corporate mining warn of environmental strains and centralisation risks. Tether’s emphasis on renewable energy uptake and decentralised software architecture reflects an attempt to mitigate these concerns. If MOS and energy projects deliver as promised, the model may provide a template for sustainable, corporate-scale participation in Bitcoin mining.

Next steps include the public release of MOS, scheduled for later in 2025, alongside scaling up of energy infrastructure across targeted Latin American sites. Close monitoring of mining output, energy efficiency, and systems performance will determine whether Tether’s pledge translates into actual dominance in global Bitcoin mining.

Barclays will prohibit customers from using personal credit and debit cards for any cryptocurrency transactions from 27 June 2025. The decision, targeting consumer protection, stems from mounting regulatory pressure and rising concerns over debt and fraud linked to crypto purchases.

The bank’s initiative aligns with guidance from the UK Financial Conduct Authority, which has flagged credit-fuelled crypto investments as high‑risk. Starting late June, any attempt to buy cryptocurrencies—such as Bitcoin or Ethereum—via personal Barclays cards will be automatically declined.

Barclays emphasises that this move is about protecting customers from potentially volatile assets acquired under credit. A spokesperson noted that while personal cards are blocked, other payment methods remain available. The bank asserts that safeguarding consumer finances remains its priority.

The FCA has long warned about the dangers of unregulated crypto assets, especially when purchased on credit. Consumers may accumulate unmanageable debt rapidly if asset prices tumble. Barclays’ policy mirrors earlier actions by Nationwide, Lloyds, and HSBC, which have instituted similar restrictions in recent years.

Industry observers suggest the move reflects wider regulatory caution. “We challenge the proposed ban…as it unfairly equates legitimate investment activity with gambling,” representatives from the UK Payments Association said. They argue customers deserve autonomy but acknowledge the bank’s concern over addiction-like behaviours and debt accumulation.

Financial behaviour analysts note that this policy is likely to reduce impulsive crypto spending, especially among less experienced investors. One market strategist commented, “The withdrawal of credit-based routes to crypto is a logical policy to limit rapid losses when prices plunge.” It may also influence broader market dynamics if other major banks adopt similar stances.

Retail crypto platforms responded with caution. Some are exploring partnerships with open finance firms, enabling bank transfers or peer-to-peer methods that evade card-related restrictions. However, these solutions still face regulatory scrutiny.

The FCA anticipates that removing credit channels will also decrease susceptibility to scams. Fraudulent schemes often exploit lending mechanisms to siphon user funds—something Barclays hopes to curtail under its new rule.

Barclays’ action adds to a string of regulatory-led shifts. After blocking card payments to Binance in July 2021, in line with an FCA notice, the bank has maintained a cautious approach. Now, the new policy encompasses all crypto transactions, regardless of the provider. While withdrawals and direct payments from existing accounts remain permitted, no credit is extended to purchase digital assets.

Crypto firms warn that this may inadvertently push users towards unregulated or foreign exchanges, increasing systemic exposure risks. They advocate for balanced regulation that allows innovation while shielding vulnerable consumers.

Despite industry pushback, Barclays notes that the measure only affects purchases with credit cards and does not restrict broader digital finance use. It emphasises support for regular account holders, offering alternative payment methods such as debit card direct transfers and open banking options.