News related to
stake

The U.S. Senate has enacted the GENIUS Act, the first-ever federal framework for regulating dollar‑pegged stablecoins, with a decisive 68–30 bipartisan vote on 17 June 2025. Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the legislation, which now advances to the House and is expected to reshape Washington’s digital asset rules.

The bill mandates that stablecoin issuers back tokens with liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries, require regular financial disclosures and adhere to anti‑money‑laundering measures. It grants banks the authority to issue stablecoins, while explicitly restricting executive branch officials and legislators from sharing in their profits—a direct response to concerns over conflicts of interest.

A surge in crypto-sector investment in political campaigns appears to have shifted momentum. Industry spending topped $119 million in support of pro‑crypto congressional candidates during the 2024 cycle. Lobbyists then intensified efforts to engage Democratic lawmakers, viewed as essential for reaching the 60-vote threshold in the evenly divided Senate.

Internal communications among Democratic operatives reveal strategic alignment with crypto backers. In a private group chat described in reporting by the Lever, coalition members acknowledged that, despite ethical concerns, opposing the industry would be “political suicide.” One member reportedly observed that any amendment targeting Trump‑family conflicts would be “DOA,” suggesting token amendments offered for optics rather than impact.

Legislators including Senator Elizabeth Warren have voiced misgivings, arguing that the bill inadequately shields consumers or addresses risks associated with big‑tech or foreign‑issued stablecoins. She contends it grants too much leeway to the likes of former President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures, such as the Trump memecoin and World Liberty Financial.

The crypto lobby’s efforts have extended beyond campaign funding to retention of influential political operatives. Coinbase, for instance, recently appointed veteran Democratic strategist David Plouffe to its advisory board, joining a roster of insiders from both parties. Observers note this reflects crypto’s emerging status as a “politically competitive” constituency.

The political dynamic has shifted decisively. As AP reports, Democrats are balancing distrust of Trump-linked crypto enterprises with newfound recognition of the sector’s electoral influence. Backing the GENIUS Act became for many a strategic necessity, notwithstanding deep ideological resistance to deregulation.

The Senate vote occurred amid broader legislative discussions. The CLARITY Act—aimed at clarifying agency jurisdiction across the SEC and CFTC—is under consideration in the House Financial Services Committee. Some lawmakers propose merging the stablecoin and authority-defining bills, though others caution it could delay the GENIUS Act’s passage.

Crypto industry leaders view the GENIUS Act as a critical precursor to more comprehensive legislation. Ledger’s Head of Global Policy, Seth Hertline, described the Senate’s action as “a political bellwether” for the sector’s broader legislative agenda.

The bill’s passage also intersects with Trump’s personal crypto interests. His family’s stablecoin projects have sparked accusations of profiteering and lobbying for relaxed oversight. Critics warn that current legislative safeguards fall short of preventing conflicts of interest.

The next phase lies in the House, where Republican leadership must reconcile the Senate’s GENIUS Act with its own STABLE Act or integrate it into broader regulatory plans. Some Republicans advocate adding provisions to limit central bank digital currency initiatives, though such measures may complicate Senate approval.

Major stablecoin issuers such as Tether and Circle —together controlling over $200 billion in supply—stand to gain regulatory clarity and legitimacy if the GENIUS Act becomes law. Recent moves by major corporates, including JPMorgan’s planned stablecoin on Coinbase’s Base chain and indications that Amazon and Walmart are exploring token issuance, signal growing private‑sector enthusiasm.

As the House deliberates, questions remain whether the Senate’s bipartisan vote marks the start of a fully fleshed-out U.S. crypto regulatory regime—or the culmination of a high-stakes battle between policy integrity and political pragmatism.

Abu Dhabi’s state‑owned oil giant ADNOC has unveiled plans to escalate its U.S. energy investments six‑fold over the next decade, targeting a total of $440 billion. Speaking in Washington on 17 June, Sultan al‑Jaber, ADNOC Chief Executive and UAE Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, declared that the American market is “not just a priority; it is an investment imperative” for the company’s global expansion.

Al‑Jaber underlined the urgency of the move, emphasising that artificial intelligence represents a “once‑in‑a‑generation investment opportunity.” He pointed out that the growth of data centres driven by AI will demand substantial power— “The next stage of evolution” in energy consumption, he said. The planned investments will span a wide spectrum: anchor stakes in the largest liquefied natural gas facility in Texas, petrochemical plants, and the deployment of 5.5 gigawatts of renewable energy paired with storage systems “from coast to coast”.

ADNOC’s international investment arm, XRG, is cementing its presence with a new Washington office, aimed at steering these high‑stakes ventures. XRG has already struck a deal with Occidental’s 1PointFive for a direct air capture project in Texas, with potential investment reaching $500 million. Additional widescale cooperation includes agreements to develop U.S. gas, LNG, specialty chemicals and energy infrastructure.

The announcement synchronises with a broader bilateral strategy: in March, senior UAE officials committed to a ten‑year, $1.4 trillion investment framework in the U.S., covering sectors such as AI, energy, semiconductors and manufacturing. As part of that pact, U.S. companies agreed to invest $60 billion in UAE energy assets. The XRG–Occidental partnership, as well as other collaborations involving ExxonMobil, Japanese firms Inpex and JODCO, is expected to expand capacity at Abu Dhabi’s major offshore oil field, Upper Zakum.

At the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Washington, al‑Jaber addressed the broader challenge of powering AI, stating that U.S. energy infrastructure must undergo a “system‑wide shift” to keep pace. He highlighted the need to hyperscale energy supply—from gas, renewables with storage and nuclear—to meet the projected requirement of 50–150 GW of new capacity just in the next five years. He warned against prematurely retiring existing power plants, advocating instead for grid modernisation and rapid permitting for new infrastructure.

Environmental groups have voiced concern that the surge in AI‑driven energy demand could lead to rising carbon emissions unless clean energy is prioritised. In response, al‑Jaber suggested that AI could, in fact, offer solutions—optimising grid efficiency and managing load fluctuations, effectively “unlocking its own energy challenge”.

The energy‑AI summit ENACT, hosted by XRG and MGX alongside the Atlantic Council, gathered leading figures from across the energy, tech and finance sectors. Delegates, including representatives from Exxon, OpenAI and BP, discussed mid‑ and long‑term strategies to address the escalating power needs of hyperscale data centres.

These developments are set against a backdrop of rising instability in the Middle East, where al‑Jaber cautioned that energy remains a “cornerstone of peace, stability and prosperity,” signalling that the new chapter of collaboration aims to underpin global energy security.

For the U.S., the influx of investment promises a host of benefits: large‑scale infrastructure expansion, high‑task employment, and reinforced energy resilience. Projects under the UAE umbrella—from LNG plants to hydrogen and carbon capture initiatives—are poised to generate thousands of jobs, while U.S. energy firms gain access to new development avenues both at home and back in the Gulf.

Yet questions remain. Policy experts stress that realisation of al‑Jaber’s ambitious vision will depend heavily on ensuring timely regulatory approvals and creating an effective risk environment for private capital. Moreover, balancing fossil fuel commitments with the drive toward decarbonisation will require clear direction from both governments and industry stakeholders.

A coalition of civic groups has presented the Election Commission with over 54,000 signatures demanding a public vote on the Entertainment Complex Business Act, a proposed law to legalise integrated resorts with casinos in Thailand. The petition surpasses the 50,000-signature threshold mandated by the National Referendum Act, compelling authorities to verify the submissions within 30 days.

The campaign, led by the Stop Gambling Foundation and allied organisations, began gathering support in January and reached its goal in May after approximately 120 days of mobilisation. On submission day, activists including Thanakorn Khomkrit, the foundation’s secretary-general, and youth representative Wasinee Sonsaeb, arrived at the Commission’s offices in Bangkok backed by over 100 civil society figures.

Proponents of the law argue it would generate substantial economic advantages. Cabinet estimates suggest that legal casinos in integrated resorts could add between US$3.5 billion and $7 billion annually to tourism revenue, attract nearly US$3 billion per development, create thousands of jobs, and lift tourist numbers by 5–10%. The government also contends such regulation might curb illegal gambling and bolster the national economy.

Yet critics argue the bill was neither debated during the 2023 election campaign nor subjected to meaningful public consultation. Thanakorn Khomkrit warned that proceeding with casino legislation without a public mandate could pose political dangers and exacerbate societal tensions, especially given concerns around sufficiency-economy principles. He urged that a referendum would lend legitimacy to both the government and investors, reducing public resistance.

Echoing those views, Wasinee Sonsaeb cautioned that legalising casinos and online gambling “would be handing down a sinful legacy to our children,” warning that current proposals echo past mistakes instead of learning from thorough consultation seen in jurisdictions like Singapore.

Under the referendum law, once the commission validates the signatures, the petition will be forwarded to the Cabinet Secretariat for consideration. The Cabinet must then approve a referendum before legislation may proceed.

The bill’s political trajectory has already faced obstacles. Introduced to Cabinet on 13 January, it received preliminary approval; however, debate was postponed until Parliament’s July session following resistance from coalition members and public protests. Proposed safeguards include a 5,000‑baht entry fee for Thai nationals with a minimum bank deposit of 50 million baht, along with capping casino space at 5% of each complex.

Economic modelling from Thailand’s Fiscal Policy Office projects that integrated resorts could draw 5–20% more foreign visitors and increase per-visitor spending from 40,000 to 60,000 baht. International gaming giants including Las Vegas Sands, MGM, Wynn, Genting, and Galaxy have reportedly expressed interest, particularly in the Bangkok market.

Still, public opposition remains fierce. Alongside concerns about youth exposure and gambling dependency, critics emphasise that transparency demands more extensive public dialogue. A January poll found nearly half the population doubted the bill would pass because of widespread disapproval.

Asian Cricket Council officials are accelerating preparations to shift the 2025 Asia Cup to the United Arab Emirates, prompted by escalating diplomatic tensions and logistical barriers between India and Pakistan. Originally awarded to India, the tournament, scheduled for September, will adopt a neutral venue in a bid to preserve participation from all eight qualifying teams. Sources within ACC and Pakistan Cricket Board suggest that holding the entire tournament in UAE offers the only viable path forward, ensuring both cricketing integrity and commercial viability.

Accruing nearly US$170 million in media rights, the Asia Cup commands considerable financial stakes. With India and Pakistan at the centre of its appeal, organisers are unwilling to jeopardise the competition. Forbes reports confirm that ACC officials have concluded that relocating the tournament is more feasible than attempting a hybrid model involving split venues. The UAE becomes the default choice, replicating approaches from previous tournaments when political dynamics between South Asian nations hindered full-fledged hosting arrangements.

PCB figures confirm that Pakistan will participate in the UAE-hosted event, despite its reluctance to travel to India. Pakistan also plans a preparatory tri-series in August in Dubai involving Afghanistan and the UAE team—effectively replacing previously scheduled fixtures and maintaining match readiness should the Asia Cup shift occur. With the PCB’s Mohsin Naqvi doubling as ACC president, such parallel initiatives underscore Pakistan’s active role in preserving the tournament’s continuity.

Yet India has maintained a discreet stance. The Board of Control for Cricket in India has neither confirmed nor denied its capacity to host or participate, with internal caution dominating its external posture. BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia recently refuted reports that India would withdraw from all ACC events. Still, precedent indicates India’s avoidance of Pakistan-hosted events: The team did not travel to Pakistan for the Champions Trophy in February–March, instead participating in Dubai under a hybrid format.

Recalling historical context affirms the ACC’s decision. In 2018, the tournament was relocated from India to UAE amid similar political friction. Such precedent sets a framework for crisis management within the sport, suggesting that regional hostilities do not necessarily derail cricketing schedules. Observers also note that India has consistently leveraged a hybrid model since 2022, notably playing Asia Cup matches in UAE and Sri Lanka rather than Pakistan.

Operationally, staging the Asia Cup in UAE will require careful planning, balancing weather conditions in September, broadcast scheduling for global audiences, and coordination with the tri-series. The PCB’s tri-series proposal is advancing, reflecting a proactive stance. Meanwhile, ACC is likely to convene soon, under Naqvi’s leadership, to finalise the tournament’s relocation, format adjustments, and confirmation of venues in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. No official announcement has yet been made, but reports from hindustantimes.com, ET and ProPakistani align in describing the move as imminent.

Stakeholders are weighing broader implications. Indian broadcasters and advertisers depend heavily on premium fixtures, particularly India–Pakistan matches that attract unparalleled viewership. A full UAE tournament may retain this commercial allure while circumventing diplomatic entanglements. For smaller teams such as Hong Kong, Oman and UAE—each having qualified through ACC’s Premier Cup—the neutral format ensures on-field exposure without political fallout.

However, dissenting voices warn against complacency. Some Pakistani conspirators question whether a UAE relocation diminishes Pakistan’s role as host, contrary to its status as 2025 Champions Trophy host and an ACC full member. Conversely, BCCI’s insistence on a hybrid model has previously delayed Pakistan-based hosting, but this time the initial hosting rights belong to India. Any pivot could attract scrutiny over ACC governance and fairness, adding dimension to an already complex political backdrop.

Supporters of the hybrid model note that India’s hybrid strategy for the Champions Trophy earlier this year preserved integrity but exposed limitations. Attendance at Dubai was lukewarm; Australia–India clashes lacked the vibrancy typical of full-capacity Pakistan venues. UAE’s smaller suburban stadiums and shorter pitches may limit spectator buzz, but logistical expediency and political neutrality weigh heavily.

Athletes themselves face uncertainty. India and Pakistan players have not toured regularly since 2008 in bilateral series, and momentum often arises through ICC events. The Asia Cup in UAE represents another opportunity for competitive engagement before the T20 World Cup in 2026. With eight teams and nineteen matches planned, this Asia Cup holds relevance for Qatar 2026 preparations. Still, fragmented venues and political overtones could overshadow performance, causing players and fans to question cricket’s autonomy from geopolitics.

As the ACC readies its final call, timing remains critical. A decision made before July is necessary to confirm bilateral arrangements, tickets, broadcasting contracts, and tri-series scheduling. ACC’s resolution will reverberate across regional cricket administration, testing confidence in neutral venues as a template for coping with diplomatic disruptions.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered the cancellation of a decades‑long indemnity that shields Israeli banks when processing shekel transactions for Palestinian counterparts, a move poised to disrupt salaries, imports and basic services across the West Bank and Gaza.

The directive, issued on 10 June 2025, halts a waiver that permitted Israeli financial institutions to facilitate payments to the Palestinian Authority and local customers without fear of legal consequences. Analysts warn this could sever Palestinian banks’ vital access to the larger Israeli banking system.

Palestinian Monetary Authority officials cautioned that this severance would seriously impede operations such as payments for food, fuel, electricity and water. In 2023 alone, around 53 billion shekels—equivalent to $15.2 billion—passed through Palestinian banking corridors. The revocation of the indemnity risks plunging the territories into a fragile cash‑only system, heightening exposure to theft, fraud and illicit activity.

Smotrich’s decision follows sanctions by the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway imposing asset freezes and travel bans on him and National Security Minister Itamar Ben‑Gvir, citing their roles in incitement and human rights abuses in the West Bank and Gaza. Smotrich maintains the waiver withdrawal is a justified response to what he terms the Palestinian Authority’s “delegitimisation campaign” against Israel.

For decades, Palestinian banking operated without central‑bank autonomy or national currency. Reliance on Israeli shekels and correspondent banking agreements has been critical. International voices—including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, G7 officials and the UN—have repeatedly warned that ending this arrangement could trigger a humanitarian crisis and violate international law.

Local analysts predict the measures will exacerbate an already deteriorating economic landscape. Kristin Ronzi of intelligence firm Rane Network said abolishing this financial collaboration will “impede the Palestinian Authority’s ability to import basic, essential goods such as food and fuel,” likely deepening economic hardship and undermining public sentiment.

The Palestinian banking system, which exceeds 100 % of GDP, is particularly vulnerable to spill‑over effects from Gaza into the West Bank, according to IMF data. The termination of the waiver is feared to amplify credit constraints on private and public sectors alike, risking reduced lending, increased borrowing costs, and even defaults.

International stakeholders, including the US and G7, had pressed for short‑term extensions of the indemnity. Those appeals often hinged on warnings that a collapse of Palestinian financial networks would destabilise trade, delay crucial services, and potentially fuel militant groups reliant on cash economies.

Smotrich is known for his hardline positions: he has previously withheld Israeli-tax clearance revenues and blocked aid in retaliation for moves supportive of Palestinian statehood. In May 2025, he warned publicly that Gaza “will be totally destroyed,” vowing to push Palestinians toward resettlement in other countries.

Within Israel, there is evident friction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and some coalition members support Smotrich, but others fear political and economic backlash—particularly amid international outrage and concern over deepening the Gaza violence. The policy must still pass through Israel’s security cabinet before implementation begins.

Across Palestinian chambers in Ramallah and Gaza City, there is growing anxiety. Authorities are scrambling to negotiate with donors, international NGOs and Middle Eastern allies, in hopes of constructing contingency plans. Proposed measures include alternative cash corridors, increased use of digital currencies, and humanitarian exemptions—but none currently matches the scale of the existing system.

Economists warn the broader consequences of this rupture—the Palestinian economy has already lost billions amid conflict. Since October 2023, Gaza’s economy shrank by 61 %, the West Bank by 24 %, and joblessness soared to around 57 % across both territories. Analysts fear the banking clamp‑down could invert years of fragile recovery efforts, worsening poverty and political instability.

Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, via its XRG investment arm, has launched an A$8.89‑per‑share all‑cash takeover offer worth roughly US$18.7 billion for Santos, Australia’s second‑largest gas producer. The bid has ignited intense scrutiny from Australian regulators concerned about safeguarding domestic gas supply and securing critical infrastructure. Simultaneously, XRG has pledged to accelerate key gas‑project development, a strategy aimed at wining over skeptical authorities and stakeholders.

The takeover offer emerges at a pivotal moment: Santos’ shares closed at A$7.73 following the announcement, indicating investor scepticism over regulatory clearance, even as the A$8.89 bid reflects a healthy 28 per cent premium. Jamie Hannah, deputy head at VanEck Australia, acknowledged that while the path ahead “is not going to be smooth sailing”, the “very attractive” straight‑cash offer underscores its appeal.

Regulatory risk centres on the critical role Santos plays in Australia’s energy system. The firm possesses about 5 per cent of eastern and 24 per cent of western domestic gas market share, essential for supplying both export and local needs. Analysts warn that the Foreign Investment Review Board, charged with vetting significant foreign acquisitions, will scrutinise ADNOC’s control over gas assets, particularly given concerns of an east‑coast gas shortfall projected by 2027.

Yet ADNOC is banking on its deep financial resources to tip the scales. XRG has emphasised it can fast‑track Santos’ stalled projects, such as Narrabri and Beetaloo, pledging to develop them faster and more robustly than Santos’ previous plan to boost shareholder returns. UBS’s Tom Allen highlighted this strength, saying regulators may view ADNOC’s funding as a delivery mechanism for the gas Australia needs.

The layered bid comes from a consortium that includes not only ADNOC’s XRG, but also Abu Dhabi Development Holding Company and private‑equity giant Carlyle, valuing Santos at some US$36.4 billion including debt – making it the largest all‑cash corporate takeover ever in Australia.

Despite such scale, state‑level political concerns are emerging. South Australia’s Premier Peter Malinauskas and Energy Minister Tom Koutsantonis have called for protections on local jobs, licence control, and keeping Santos’s headquarters in Adelaide. Meanwhile, new state legislation adds weight to ministerial approval of petroleum licence transfers, granting South Australia extra leverage in the process.

At the federal level, Treasurer Jim Chalmers holds the ultimate authority. His decision will rely closely on FIRB advice, with insiders describing it as a pivotal “captain’s call” for the Albanese government. The broader Ministry of Energy and Resources, currently reviewing gas supply strategies, may leverage the bid to extract concessions in line with looming energy security needs.

Santos CEO Kevin Gallagher, whose compensation could wind up exceeding A$50 million if the deal proceeds, has maintained discretion, saying he will “let the process take its course”. Gallagher previously brought forward a stalled bid with Woodside, signalling a strategic interest in consolidation.

Market sentiment remains guarded but not dismissive. Santos shares rallied approximately 11 per cent in the wake of the board’s backing of the bid and release of due‑diligence exclusivity. Analysts point to ADNOC’s deep capital reserves and the trade deal with the UAE as factors that may cushion adversities and lend credence to the offer.

One area of uncertainty is the domestic Narrabri gas project in New South Wales: although Novation from the recent Native Title Tribunal clearance supports its long‑anticipated development, ongoing regulatory review and possible asset spin‑offs to comply with FIRB guidelines could delay its final investment decision. Analysts have speculated that domestic‑facing assets might be excluded or managed separately, potentially involving Carlyle as a local partner to satisfy national interest criteria.

This complex engineering of commercial ambition and governmental oversight places energy security at the centre of the acquisition narrative. While ADNOC’s financial might and project‑acceleration promise may reassure regulators, political and community stakeholders are tightening the lens on national asset control, job retention, and supply resilience. The outcome will hinge on whether FIRB, acting on Chalmers’s counsel, accepts the consortium’s assurances — or opts for a compromise that safeguards domestic gas capacity.

Issuing its first formal financial move beyond social media, Truth Social’s parent, Trump Media & Technology Group, has filed an S‑1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange‑traded fund under the Truth Social brand. The application outlines plans to list the fund on NYSE Arca, although ticker symbols and fee structures have yet to be disclosed.

NYSE Arca initiated the process on 3 June 2025 by submitting a Form 19b‑4 on behalf of TMTG and partner Yorkville America Digital, seeking approval to list the dual‑crypto ETF. The S‑1 filing followed on 5 June and provides deeper insights into structure and risk disclosures. The filings initiate the standard dual‑review process; the SEC has a 45‑day window for initial decision and up to 240 days for final approval.

The prospectus confirms that the fund will hold spot Bitcoin and Ethereum—the first dual‑crypto vehicle under the Truth Social banner. Physical custody of assets will be handled by Foris DAX Trust Company, affiliated with Crypto.com, which will also serve as execution agent and liquidity provider. Yorkville America Digital, a Florida‑based asset manager that emphasises “Made‑in‑America” digital‑asset products, is named as the sponsor.

Eric Balchunas, senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, noted the risk disclosures reference President Trump’s crypto‑favourable posture—highlighting regulatory shifts, the SEC’s newly launched crypto task force, and a strategic U.S. Bitcoin reserve executive order—marking the first time an ETF filing openly tied a sitting president’s actions to fund risk.

The launch is part of a broader the strategic pivot by Truth Social into financial services. Earlier this year, Trump Media announced a $2.5 billion Bitcoin treasury initiative and submitted trademark applications under its Truth.Fi brand for various crypto‑focused products. The move aligns with similar industry trends—11 spot Bitcoin ETFs have been approved since January 2024 by providers including BlackRock, Fidelity and Grayscale—a venue drawing billions in investor capital.

Yet the dual‑crypto ETF enters a saturated market, and analysts caution that without distinctive value, it may not draw substantial flows despite its political branding. Market watchers observe that assets under management in competing spot Bitcoin ETFs are heavily concentrated—with BlackRock’s IBIT holding approximately $69 billion, followed by Fidelity’s fund at around $21 billion.

The filings also highlight potential conflicts of interest. Yorkville America has financial ties with TMTG, including advising on Truth.Fi and investing in both the firm’s stock and private placement used to bolster the Bitcoin treasury. The application explicitly acknowledges these links may pose risks to investors.

Timing is politically significant, with the SEC’s current leadership under Paul Atkins perceived as taking a more crypto‑friendly stance. SEC deregulation efforts under President Trump’s administration also form part of the context.

Should the ETF be approved, it will enable investors to gain regulated exposure to Bitcoin and Ethereum—devoid of managing digital wallets or crypto‑exchange accounts—via traditional brokerage channels. The fund is poised to calculate daily net asset values, with intraday quotations updated every 15 seconds and comprehensive transparency on holdings, premiums and discounts.

However, regulatory clarity remains pending. Absent from the filings are critical operational details, including ticker symbols, expense ratios and seed capital levels. Until the S‑1 becomes effective, the ETF cannot be marketed to investors.

This marks a strategic landmark in Truth Social’s quest to diversify beyond digital media. Its expansion into crypto finance brings together political influence, regulatory momentum and mainstream investor demand, potentially reshaping its corporate identity. At stake is the fund’s ability to carve a credible and competitive space among established crypto‑ETF leaders.

Turkish Airlines and TAP Air Portugal have deepened their codeshare collaboration, extending shared services to a host of new international destinations. Under the broadened agreement unveiled at the IATA Annual General Meeting on 4 June, travellers can now book seamless flights on routes to Brazil, Morocco, Qatar and Mauritius, while Turkish domestic holiday hotspots Dalaman and Bodrum are also integrated into the expanded arrangement.

Bilal Ekşi, chief executive of Turkish Airlines, explained that the enhanced alliance “offers greater flexibility and a wider range of travel options” and aims to bolster tourist and business connectivity between Türkiye and Portugal. TAP Air Portugal CEO Luís Rodrigues underscored that strategic partnerships are essential for extending the airline’s reach eastwards, remarking that the arrangement “provides our global passengers and our Portuguese community with increased options to visit new and exciting places using our Turkish Airlines partner”.

Both carriers are members of the Star Alliance network, which encompasses more than 1,160 airports in over 190 countries. Turkish Airlines, holding a Guinness World Record since December 2024 for servicing the largest number of countries, flies to 340 destinations across 129 countries, while TAP Air Portugal ranks as Europe’s safest airline and leads European service to Brazil.

The update enhances booking convenience and connectivity for passengers. With the codeshare, flyers can book single-ticket itineraries that combine flights operated by each carrier, gain through-check of baggage, and accrue loyalty benefits across both their Miles&Smiles and TAP Miles&Go programmes. The inclusion of Brazil responds to TAP’s strong presence in South America, where the airline operates over 1,250 weekly flights to 14 cities.

Beyond South America, the new route options into North Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian Ocean signify a strategic push to diversify leisure and business travel offerings. Dalaman and Bodrum, already popular among European tourists, have now become a seamless gateway for Portuguese travellers to experience Turkish coastlines within the shared network.

Theresa Walsh, aviation analyst at AeroInsight Strategies, noted that although codeshare agreements are common, this specific expansion stands out due to its geographical reach: “Covering holiday-centric jets like Dalaman and bridging long-haul markets from Lisbon to São Paulo or Doha offers a genuinely integrated experience.” She projected that ticket sales could rise by up to 8–10% on the newly covered routes over the next year.

Industry experts highlight that the move may also serve as a template for TAP as it navigates its planned partial privatisation. Portugal’s government is preparing to offload its 51% stake in TAP, with a 49% stake open to bids from Air France‑KLM, Lufthansa or IAG. Strengthening international partnerships may enhance TAP’s value proposition to prospective investors by showcasing expanded network synergy.

Passenger advocacy groups have raised the question of whether such agreements might introduce pricing complexity, as combining two carriers can involve disparate fare rules. Both airlines have reassured the public that prices will remain transparent, with unified booking and support frameworks across shared routes.

Operationally, the partners will synchronise schedules, optimise cabin connections, and co‑ordinate service protocols. TAP’s fleet of Airbus NEO aircraft, lauded for fuel efficiency, will fly in conjunction with Turkish Airlines’ diverse mix of modern jets.

Premier travel agents in Lisbon and Istanbul report immediate upticks in enquiries. João Ribeiro, a senior agent at Lusitano Travel, commented: “Our clients value simplicity. Booking Lisbon–Bodrum via Istanbul on one ticket, with aligned timings and baggage allowances, is exactly the evolution they want.”

The alliance extension comes as both airlines seek to rebalance portfolios in response to shifting tourism trends and evolving geopolitics. Airlines across Europe are recalibrating their route maps to lean on partnership networks, minimising standalone risk. The expanded Turkish‑TAP codeshare is among the most notable examples of this trend in 2025.

Abu Dhabi hosted the culminating round of the Grand Prix Grappling World Tour at Mubadala Arena, Zayed Sports City, drawing hundreds of athletes from over 50 nations yesterday. The UAE secured top position in the overall standings, with 31,000 points, narrowly surpassing Brazil’s 30,600 and Russia’s 19,000, highlighting Emirati athletic rise in combat sports.

Leading the charge was Khaled Al Shehhi, who seized gold in the professional division after a series of commanding performances. Demonstrating exceptional physical strength and technical finesse, Al Shehhi attributed his victory to years of rigorous training and unwavering institutional backing from national leadership. He praised the diversity of grappling styles present and affirmed that the title represents a “significant milestone” in his career.

In the heavyweight division, Pouya Rahmani also took home gold. He commended the tournament’s professionalism, citing world‑class refereeing and flawless logistical arrangements, which, he added, elevated his performance amid a passionate crowd.

Organised by the Abu Dhabi Jiu‑Jitsu Pro Federation, the event underlined Abu Dhabi’s growing stature as a global combat‑sports hub. Its presence on the AJP calendar consistently attracts elite talent and contributes to the city’s international sporting profile.

Analysts note that this iteration—held on 14 June 2025—reflects a wider trend of rising investment and performance in grappling disciplines across the Gulf. With significant prize money and global ranking points at stake, UK‑based grappling commentator James Carter remarked: “This tournament is fast evolving into a key international stage for pro grapplers—it draws tactical competitors from Europe, South America, and Asia alike.”

Data from AJP shows this year’s event awarded 2,000 global ranking points to each champion—an incentive that has increased both participation and competitive intensity.

At the closing ceremony, Tareq Al Bahri, general manager of AJP, lauded the standard of competition and Emirati athletes’ achievements. He emphasised that national development programmes have been instrumental in nurturing home‑grown talent, with jiu‑jitsu federations investing in grassroots camps and international coaching exchanges.

Veteran coach Maria Fernandez, who oversees female grappling teams across the region, observed that the UAE’s multi‑tiered strategy—combining youth training, scholarships, and elite events at Mubadala Arena—has yielded visible results. “What we’ve seen here isn’t just isolated wins; it’s structural change. The UAE is visibly closing the gap with traditionally dominant nations like Brazil and Russia,” she said.

Looking ahead, organisers confirm that the Abu Dhabi stop is set to remain a keystone of the 2025‑26 AJP Grappling World Tour. Future events, including youth and professional categories, will continue at Mubadala Arena and additional venues across the emirate, reinforcing Abu Dhabi’s role in hosting elite martial‑arts competition.

For Khaled Al Shehhi and Pouya Rahmani, the gold medals on home soil represent both personal triumph and national pride. Their performances, supported by a robust governance and funding framework, signal a shifting landscape in global grappling—a sport now gaining serious ground in the Middle East.

Ajman has emerged as the host for the 58th Asian Fitness and Bodybuilding Championship, taking place from 15 to 17 June 2025 at the Emirates Hospitality Centre. The emirate, hosting the event for the first time, extends a formal welcome under the patronage of His Highness Sheikh Ammar bin Humaid Al Nuaimi, Crown Prince of Ajman and Chairman of the Executive Council, with the presence of Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Humaid Al Nuaimi, Chairman of the Ajman Department of Tourism Development.

Delegations from 23 nations across Asia will converge on Ajman this week, marking a notable heightening of the emirate’s stature within international sports circles. The Asian Bodybuilding and Fitness Federation’s congress also convened on 14 June, assembling leading officials and athletes to chart governance, standards and growth pathways for the sport across the continent.

IFBB President Dr Rafael Santonja expressed strong approval of Ajman’s preparations. He praised the local authorities’ logistical efforts and voiced confidence that the event will proceed in “the best possible manner,” reflecting meticulous planning.

By integrating top-tier competition with a high-level governance forum, Ajman seeks to project itself as a dynamic arena for Asia’s sporting peaks. The congress set the stage for the championships, drawing attention to the need for continuity between seasonally organised regional fests and global-level federation oversight.

Competitors span multiple divisions, including bodybuilding by height, men’s and women’s physique, fitness challenge categories, and adaptive contests such as wheelchair bodybuilding and para-bodybuilding. The comprehensive format reflects the IFBB’s commitment to expanding inclusivity, with winners across senior classes earning IFBB Pro Cards, enhancing the stakes for participants.

Logistics have been arranged to accommodate the influx of athletes, officials and support staff. Delegations arrived on 14 June, as confirmed by weigh-ins and registration hosted at the Bahi Ajman Palace Hotel. The adjacent Asian Federation congress was conducted at Ajman Saray Hotel. Recommended airports include Sharjah and Dubai, easing international access to the host emirate.

Entry structures show stringent anti-doping controls, with compliance to WADA standards in place. National federations have a stringent responsibility to vet athletes, especially those with past doping violations. Consent to drug testing was mandatory upon registration.

Registration fees include accommodation and meals from 14 to 18 June, with athletes opting for single or shared rooms at Bahi Ajman Palace Hotel. Crossover category participants incur a USD 100 surcharge.

The championship schedule unfolds across three days, with prejudging commencing on Day 2. Finals continue through Day 3 and Day 4 before closing events conclude on 17 June. Delegations depart on 18 June. This compact time-frame underscores an intention to deliver a high-impact, tightly controlled competition.

Ajman’s hosting aligns with a broader push to diversify its economy through sporting tourism and cultural diplomacy. The tourism authority unveiled the event’s logo and mascot—‘Mayed’—alongside traditional Emirati performances, highlighting the interplay between sporting and cultural platforms. The championship is expected to catalyse increased occupancy in the hospitality sector and heightened international visibility.

Preparatory logistics—hotel accommodations, venue readiness, anti-doping protocols, and athlete transport—underscore Ajman’s growing capacity to stage large-scale events. Federal backing ensures alignment with Wahid leadership’s vision to see the emirate emerge as a regional hub for international gatherings across sports, business, and tourism.

The intersection of high-performance sport, organisational governance and cultural presentation at Ajman’s inaugural hosting of the Asian Fitness and Bodybuilding Championship signals the emirate’s aspiration to position itself prominently on Asia’s event map.

Tencent is reportedly in discussions to acquire Nexon, the developer behind MapleStory and Dungeon & Fighter, in a deal that could exceed US$15 billion, signalling a strategic push into South Korea’s gaming and Web3 sectors.

Chinese tech conglomerate Tencent has approached the family of Nexon’s late founder Kim Jung‑ju, which controls a 44.4 per cent stake through NXC Corp, to explore acquiring a substantial portion or full control of the company. The proposed transaction, valued at around 20 trillion won, aims to secure Tencent long‑term rights to Nexon’s celebrated intellectual property while bolstering its position in South Korea’s lucrative gaming market.

Nexon, founded in Seoul in 1994 and now headquartered in Tokyo, is best known for its enduring franchises MapleStory and Dungeon & Fighter. The firm has been a pioneer in integrating games with Web3 technologies, launching a blockchain division dubbed NEXPACE and rolling out MapleStory Universe—complete with NFT item mechanics, token economies and a gasless transaction system on the Avalanche network. The NXPC token was listed on major crypto exchanges, reflecting deep commitment to a decentralised gaming strategy.

While Tencent had previously tried to acquire Nexon in 2019—efforts fell through over valuation disagreements—the company has since fortified its global gaming footprint with a US$1.3 billion investment in Ubisoft and a 10 per cent stake in South Korea’s SM Entertainment, a major K‑pop label. Its renewed interest in Nexon aligns with a broader ambition to dominate both blockchain and traditional gaming domains, despite sector‑wide funding slowdowns and reduced daily active user metrics in Web3 games.

Sources emphasise that while discussions are underway, no definitive agreement has been reached and terms remain fluid. The Kim family is reportedly consulting financial advisers on the potential sale. Part of the complexity stems from their decision last year to transfer shares to settle inheritance taxes, a move that added governmental and family stakeholders into the mix.

Nexon has seen its share price rise over 10 per cent in 2025, though it remains about 30 per cent below its 2021 peak. The Tokyo‑listed firm was valued at approximately US$15–16.6 billion, depending on market conditions.

Tencent’s remote stance with acquired studios suggests that any purchase may leave Nexon’s operational autonomy largely intact. But the deal could deliver Tencent stronger access to Western and Asian markets, reinforcing its Web3 and blockchain ambitions.

For Nexon, aligning with Tencent offers capital resources to scale blockchain gaming efforts and deepen development of blockchain-enabled platforms such as MapleStory Universe. Since launching MapleStory N in May 2025, the company has leveraged its Web3 unit’s Abu Dhabi‑based NEXPACE to expand global blockchain gaming operations.

With Tencent prioritising organic growth and strategic minority investments—such as expanding its blockchain infrastructure partnerships with TON Foundation and Chainbase—this potential acquisition represents one of its most ambitious M&A moves post‑2020 Chinese regulatory tightening.

Should negotiations succeed, Tencent would gain direct control over multiple high‑value IPs and a formidable presence in South Korea’s gaming ecosystem, presenting both strategic advantages and regulatory scrutiny across jurisdictions. The deal’s complexity—woven through family, government, and market dynamics—ensures that stakeholders across the industry are closely watching every development.

Major corporations Walmart and Amazon are understood to be mulling the launch of their own stablecoins as part of a broader trend among retailers and tech companies seeking to streamline payment systems and reduce transaction costs. With the U.S. Congress advancing the GENIUS Act—legislation to regulate stablecoin issuance—the moment now appears opportune for these private-sector experiments.

Both Walmart and Amazon are reportedly evaluating the regulatory environment and potential use cases for proprietary stablecoins. Sources suggest these could be integrated with payment platforms, loyalty schemes and digital marketplaces. Such a move would allow these companies to bypass conventional card rails and intermediaries that currently levy high fees on merchants and slow settlement times.

Walmart’s ongoing fintech ambitions align with the exploration of stablecoin applications. The retailer has already lobbied for regulatory changes aimed at bringing greater competition into credit card networks, indicating a broader shift towards alternative payment mechanisms. Amazon, though in the preliminary assessment stage, is also understood to be considering whether a branded stablecoin might enhance the convenience of online transactions.

The GENIUS Act currently under Senate review is central to this evolution. It delineates a framework for “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” and mandates reserve requirements, redemption rules and federal oversight. While enabling banks, non-banks and subsidiaries to issue stablecoins, it permits notable flexibility across different sectors.

Critics are already voicing concerns. Legislators such as Senator Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Maxine Waters caution against allowing large non-financial firms to enter the payments landscape, fearing an erosion of banking safeguards and potential intensified corporate dominance. Academic voices, including law professor Hilary Allen, warn that Big Tech’s entry into finance could “entrench corporate power” and compromise consumer data privacy.

A key sticking point lies in a proposed amendment to prohibit non-financial corporations from issuing stablecoins unless they meet stringent criteria around financial stability, data protection and consumer welfare. This amendment would cover tech behemoths like Amazon, Meta and Apple. In contrast, proponents argue that allowing these companies in could foster innovation and enhance market competition.

Merchant industries are lobbying hard for clarity. The Merchants Payments Coalition argues that a stablecoin framework could disrupt the dominance of established payment networks and deliver substantial cost savings. Stakeholders have highlighted how cross-border payments could benefit from low-cost, near-instant settlement, echoing the broader fintech industry’s embrace of stablecoins as programmable rails for digital commerce.

Opposition remains robust, however. Critics warn that unbridled stablecoin issuance by non-financial corporations could introduce systemic risks. The GENIUS Act’s provisions are aimed at managing these risks through requirements for reserves, transparency, anti-money laundering compliance and state-federal coordination. Still, there is unease that enforcement mechanisms may not sufficiently address deep-seated concerns over financial stability and consumer safety.

Proponents believe stablecoins could transform how commerce operates, by speeding up settlements, reducing fees and enabling more fluid integration across digital platforms. With adoption driven by both large merchants and smaller enterprises, the innovation rather than consolidation of money systems could mark a significant shift.

Walmart and Amazon appear poised to test these boundaries. As the GENIUS Act moves closer to a Senate floor vote, the exact role that private-sector stablecoins will play remains uncertain. The decision by Congress to permit non-bank issuers is a strategic pivot, opening regulatory pathways that could redefine how money flows through the global payments ecosystem.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chair Paul Atkins has formally withdrawn several cryptocurrency-focused rule proposals initiated under former chair Gary Gensler, representing a decisive shift in regulatory strategy.

At the centre of the SEC’s action are two major proposals: amendments to Exchange Act Rule 3b‑16, which sought to classify decentralized finance protocols as securities exchanges, and the implementation of enhanced custody requirements under the Investment Advisers Act for client crypto assets. The withdrawal, confirmed on 13 June 2025, reflects a broader deregulatory drive under the current administration.

Rule 3b‑16 had been poised to expand the SEC’s definition of “exchange” to include systems bringing together buyers and sellers of securities via smart contracts and other DeFi mechanisms. The proposal would have subjected many decentralised platforms to full regulatory oversight, unsettling industry participants and drawing criticism from blockchain developers and legal experts. Many in the crypto sector argued the move would permanently conflate DeFi infrastructure with traditional securities exchanges, hampering innovation.

The custody rule aimed to require investment advisers to deposit all client crypto assets with “qualified custodians” such as banks or registered broker‑dealers. That would have effectively sidelined many crypto-native custodians that don’t meet these standards. Proponents cited the need for robust safeguards, while opponents warned the rule would force clients into a narrow pool of custodians and increase costs.

The SEC’s withdrawal announcement emphasised that it will not pursue finalisation of these proposals and may “consider new rulemaking in the future.” The reversals are part of a broader retreat from Gensler-era initiatives, including planned ESG reporting mandates and cybersecurity obligations. Acting chair Mark Uyeda had suspended both the DeFi exchange and custody rules in March, and this withdrawal gives that decision official effect.

Market reaction was swift. Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, declared on X that the agency had scrapped “3b16, qualified custodian, and all other unfinished Gensler rule proposals.” Crypto platforms welcomed the rollback, viewing it as a reaffirmation of self‑custody and decentralised financial innovation.

Institutional stakeholders also voiced support. Brian Laverdure, Senior VP of Digital Assets and Innovation Policy at ICBA, noted the agency’s publication had “withdraws several NPRMs” including definition of “exchange” changes and safeguarding rules, sending confidence ripples through community banks and investment advisers.

The shift in posture follows President Donald Trump’s commitment to reducing regulatory burdens on markets. In tandem, SEC staff and FINRA dismantled a long-standing 2019 joint statement on broker‑dealer custody of digital asset securities on 15 May, paving the way for regulated intermediaries to offer crypto custody services under established rules.

The SEC’s deregulatory drive is echoed in recent comments from Uyeda, who in March announced the agency might scrap or significantly amend crypto custody rules introduced during the previous administration. He emphasised a pivot towards “effective and cost‑efficient regulations that respect the limits of our statutory authority”.

Critics caution that this pivot could expose clients to risks. While standards for DeFi governance, custodial integrity, and cybersecurity remain under voluntary frameworks, there are concerns that stripping formal oversight could open institutional and retail investors to vulnerabilities. Legal analysts predict renewed debate over the SEC’s authority to classify new financial structures as securities.

DeFi proponents, for their part, argue the withdrawal presents an opportunity. With regulatory certainty withdrawn, startups and developers may double down on innovation, integrating hybrid compliance models that rely on decentralised autonomy rather than central oversight. Meanwhile, traditional custodians and broker‑dealers are expected to enter the crypto space more aggressively, now freed from the obligation of specialist “qualified custodian” status.

Remaining questions include whether Congress will move to impose legislative frameworks on digital assets and whether the SEC will pursue fresh proposals under a different legal theory. Commissioner Hester Peirce has signalled support for further dialogue and interpretative guidance, reinforcing a more incremental, consultative regulatory model.

The SEC is now scheduled to hold stakeholder forums and public consultations in the coming months. Industry watchers are closely tracking these developments to assess whether the rollback represents a long-term deregulatory reorientation or a temporary reprieve preceding fresh oversight efforts.