News related to
Bank

Emirates NBD has sealed a strategic partnership with the Dubai International Financial Centre aimed at offering enhanced wealth governance, succession planning and legacy-preservation services to ultra-high-net-worth families and family-owned enterprises. The collaboration will channel the capabilities of Emirates NBD Private Banking and the infrastructure of DIFC’s Family Wealth Centre to meet the complex needs of family businesses within the jurisdiction.

Under the agreement, Emirates NBD will provide tailored governance frameworks, succession-planning blueprints, tax structuring, and bespoke advisory services designed for clients with significant wealth or business holdings. The bank intends to complement these offerings with educational workshops, governance-best-practice programmes and family-office structuring support — all delivered through DIFC’s institutional facilities.

The move reflects growing demand in the Middle East for professionalised wealth-transfer and legacy-management solutions as substantial assets stand to pass to younger generations. Regional trends indicate about one trillion US dollars in assets are expected to be transferred within wealthy families by 2030, underscoring the urgency for robust governance structures.

United Kingdom legislation now formally recognises digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as personal property, offering holders protections under established property law. The Property Act 2025 — previously a bill — received royal assent, confirming that digital tokens may be treated as a third category of personal property alongside traditional “things in possession” and “things in action.” This marks a decisive shift from earlier reliance on case-by-case rulings by courts.

Legal recognition ensures that crypto-owners gain enforceable rights in instances of theft, fraud or insolvency, and enables digital assets to be included in estates or bankruptcy proceedings under the same protections afforded to conventional property. The Act does not itself define which digital assets qualify — courts will decide those details over time.

Judicial developments had already begun to lay the groundwork for this change. As early as 2019, the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce concluded that crypto-assets met criteria for property under English law: they could be defined, identified, transferred and treated as assets capable of value retention. A key case, AA v Persons Unknown, saw the High Court of England and Wales recognise Bitcoin provided as ransom in a cyber-attack as property, granting the insurer a proprietary injunction.

Advocates of the law hailed it as providing clarity long sought by individuals and businesses holding crypto-assets. CryptoUK, a leading trade body for digital assets, noted that while courts had already treated crypto as property in some cases, codifying the principle into statute removes uncertainty and streamlines legal protections across theft, insolvency and estate-related scenarios.

Legal experts say the Act reflects the recommendations laid out by the Law Commission in a 2023 report, which urged reform to ensure the law could accommodate emerging digital assets under a flexible yet robust framework. The Commission argued that existing categories of personal property under law were too rigid to account for assets that lacked physical form or contractual rights.

This statutory change arrives as UK regulators concurrently refine the broader regime for crypto-assets. Draft legislation published earlier this year already seeks to amend the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to designate certain “qualifying cryptoassets” and “qualifying stablecoins” as regulated investments, bringing market-level rules for trading, custody and compliance under formal oversight.

While the law does not render cryptocurrency a legal tender — meaning it still cannot be used to settle debts in substitute for currency — its classification as property gives holders legal certainty over ownership and enforceable rights. Taxation and regulatory treatment will continue to follow established frameworks, though this legal milestone reduces ambiguity over the status of crypto-assets in private law contexts.

Judges, lawyers and market participants anticipate that the Act will lead to a more stable and predictable legal environment for crypto-asset ownership, enabling individuals and institutions to treat tokens with the same legal respect accorded to traditional assets. As the courts start applying the new law in real cases, the boundaries of which digital assets qualify will grow clearer — and the UK’s position as a regulatory pioneer in digital asset law will be reaffirmed.

Belgium has rejected a proposal by the European Union to channel frozen Russian assets toward a major financial aid package for Ukraine, dealing a blow to efforts aimed at sustaining Kyiv’s war-time finances. The plan envisioned a €140 billion “reparations loan,” backed by immobilised Russian central-bank reserves held largely in Belgium’s Euroclear, but Belgian leaders argued the risks are too high—legal, financial and reputational.

The opposition centres on statements from Bart De Wever, Belgium’s prime minister, who described the plan as “fundamentally flawed”. He warned that using the frozen assets at this stage could trigger lawsuits, force Belgium to shoulder massive liabilities, and destabilise confidence in the euro. De Wever rejected broad incentives offered by the European Commission and demanded legally binding guarantees from other EU member states before any commitment.

Backing Ukraine with frozen Russian funds had gained traction as European leaders scrambled to meet Kyiv’s projected needs through 2026–2027. Analysts estimate that Ukraine faces a budget shortfall of more than €135 billion over the next two years, with defence expenditures alone ballooning. The EU had considered not just using interest on the frozen assets — which has supported a G7-backed aid programme so far — but deploying the assets themselves as collateral to unlock large-scale funding.

Yet the European Central Bank has refused to provide emergency liquidity for the proposed loan, citing its mandate forbidding direct monetary financing to governments under EU treaties. The refusal undermines the viability of the scheme, especially since liquidity back-stops were meant to reassure markets and protect institutions like Euroclear from sudden liability.

Some EU member states and financial experts contended that employing frozen assets would free up taxpayer money and symbolically re-affirm Europe’s stance that Russia must pay for its aggression. Academics have pointed out how using immobilised reserves could offer Ukraine immediate relief without expanding EU sovereign debt. The Commission is reportedly exploring fallback options, such as joint borrowing backed by the EU budget or bilateral loans, but those alternatives are expected to carry higher costs and slower disbursement timelines.

Opposing countries argue the plan violates property rights, jeopardises investor confidence and could provoke Russian retaliation, both legally and economically. Euroclear itself has warned of potential lawsuits and damage to its reputation as a global securities depository if assets are re-purposed in this way.

With less than three weeks remaining before a planned EU summit, Belgium’s refusal complicates efforts to finalise a unified approach. Brussels appears unlikely to shift position without assurances that risks will be shared evenly — a prospect many member states view as tantamount to signing a blank cheque.

Regulators at the Federal Reserve are moving to formalise rules for stablecoins, signalling a shift in how banks may soon treat these digital assets under supervision. The Vice Chair for Supervision at the Fed, Michelle Bowman, emphasised that banks should be able to engage with digital currencies — including stablecoins — under new regulatory guardrails. She argued that existing regulations, many crafted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, may no longer be appropriate given how much the economy and technology have evolved. Her remarks came against the backdrop of recent legislation that lays the groundwork for stablecoin regulation, prompting an overhaul of existing frameworks to encourage innovation while managing risk.

The regulatory momentum follows the passage of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U. S. Stablecoins Act — known as the GENIUS Act — which establishes a comprehensive legal framework for payment stablecoins. Under the law, issuers of stablecoins must back tokens on a one-to-one basis with U. S. dollars or other low-risk assets, provide regular disclosure of reserves, and maintain transparent redemption processes. This marks a turning point: stablecoins officially enter the regulated financial system, opening the door for banks and other financial institutions to participate under defined standards.

Bowman has signalled that the Federal Reserve, alongside agencies such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC, intends to craft tailored supervisory guidelines rather than impose a one-size-fits-all regulatory model. She has called for regulators to abandon what she described as an “overly cautious mindset” that has slowed the banking sector’s ability to embrace digital innovation. According to her, banks seeking to engage in stablecoin activities must separate those assets from their traditional banking operations. This segregation, she said, is necessary to preserve the safety and soundness of the banking system even as banks expand into digital asset services.

The move has drawn cautious optimism from some quarters of the financial world, particularly among proponents of digital assets and stablecoin issuers, who view increased regulatory clarity as critical for broader adoption. They argue that a well-designed framework will enable mainstream financial institutions to offer digital asset services, increasing legitimacy and liquidity in the stablecoin market. Analysts point to academic research suggesting stablecoins have evolved from niche cryptocurrency experiments to integral components of payments infrastructure worldwide — with stablecoins’ market capitalisation estimated to exceed several hundred billion dollars. Some experts have proposed hybrid models that combine fiat-backed stablecoins with central-bank anchored systems to mitigate liquidity risks and improve stability, particularly in volatile market conditions.

At the same time, concerns remain about potential threats to financial stability. Regulators such as the Fed must weigh the risk of deposit outflows, competition between banks and non-bank issuers, and the challenge of preventing money-laundering or illicit finance through digital assets. Financial supervisors globally are wrestling with how to calibrate capital requirements and risk-weighting rules for banks engaging with stablecoins and digital tokens — taking into account factors like volatility, liquidity stress, and redemption risk.

Crypto markets endured a sharp shake-out as leveraged positions worth roughly $800 million were liquidated within a single 24-hour span, wiping out a wave of long bets across major digital assets.

The dump was triggered when Bitcoin slipped below a key price threshold, pressuring highly leveraged long positions on futures markets and prompting a cascade of forced sell-offs. Platforms such as Hyperliquid and Bybit reportedly absorbed the majority of the liquidations, underscoring how overextended trader leverage remains widespread even after prior volatility.

Data compiled by derivatives-monitoring firms shows hundreds of thousands of traders saw their positions wiped out, reflecting a broad-based unwind rather than a handful of large outliers. Long positions accounted for the lion’s share of the losses, a pattern that analysts argue deepens near-term downside risk while simultaneously resetting excessive leverage.

Market participants suggest the liquidation sequence was worsened by macroeconomic uncertainty. Signals from major central banks hinting at tighter monetary policy have quelled risk appetite, undermining speculative crypto bets built on hopes of renewed easy capital. A stronger dollar and rising bond yields weighed on crypto sentiment and intensified pressure on leveraged positions.

Declines weren’t limited to Bitcoin. Ethereum and other large-cap altcoins also suffered sharp drawdowns as falling prices triggered liquidation cascades across the derivatives market. As leverage unwinding rippled through the system, traders who had bet on a sustained rebound found themselves among the hardest hit.

Some investors framed this purge of leverage as a potential reset for the crypto market. Clearing out excessive long exposure might pave the way for more stable price action if broader buying support returns. Others, however, cautioned that forced liquidations could destabilise confidence and deepen volatility — especially if macro headwinds persist.

Japan’s 10-year government bond yield jumped to 1.84 percent, marking its highest level since 2008, sending ripples across global financial markets. Equities and risk assets came under pressure while investors reassessed portfolios built on cheap Japanese funding.

The surge reflects an abrupt shift away from decades of near-zero rates in Japan, transforming the dynamics of global capital flows. Long considered a foundation of stability, Japanese government bonds are now drawing fresh interest, prompting capital repatriation as investors seek higher yields at home. This shift threatens to unwind the entrenched “yen carry trade,” where investors borrowed yen cheaply to pour money into higher-yielding markets abroad — including equities and cryptocurrencies. With yen-denominated debt now offering compelling returns, such cross-border funding strategies are losing appeal.

As liquidity conditions tighten, markets for risk assets are being reshaped. Cryptocurrencies and tech stocks, once buoyed by easy global credit, have borne the brunt of investor risk aversion. Traders point out that this yield shock was partly triggered by a shift in market expectations around the Bank of Japan, which has signalled the possibility of further rate increases in its upcoming policy review. That, combined with concerns over Japan’s sizeable fiscal obligations and growing government borrowing, is pushing bond yields across the maturity curve higher — including 20-, 30- and 40-year maturities that recently recorded historic highs.

For global investors, the implications are stark. Funds and hedge-fund managers that relied on yen-funded carry trades now face rising funding costs and diminishing returns. Emerging markets and growth-oriented sectors that thrived on abundant liquidity may see capital outflows as investors retreat to safer, yield-bearing bonds. Currency markets have already reacted: the yen has strengthened sharply, adding pressure on exporters and raising the cost of dollar-denominated investments for Japan-based holders.

Analysts note that this yield shock does not necessarily spell widespread collapse — but signals a structural recalibration. Portfolios will need to adapt to a world where Japanese bonds are no longer a funding tool, but a competing asset class in their own right. For risk assets to recover, markets will need fresh capital inflows rather than the easy money of the past.

China’s central bank has reaffirmed its prohibition on cryptocurrency use and announced a renewed enforcement drive targeting stablecoins and underground trading networks. At a high-level interagency meeting convened in Beijing by the People’s Bank of China, officials declared that all virtual currencies remain outside the legal tender framework and insisted that any related business activity constitutes illicit financial conduct.

The PBOC underscored heightened concerns over what it described as a resurgence in speculative trading and misuse of stablecoins. According to the statement delivered at the meeting, stablecoins fail to meet mandatory requirements for identity verification and anti-money-laundering safeguards — deficiencies that increase their vulnerability to use in fraud, money laundering and unauthorised cross-border transfers.

China outlawed trading and mining of cryptocurrencies in 2021, with regulators barring financial institutions and intermediaries from facilitating such activity. The current announcement makes explicit that the ban also extends to stablecoins — digital assets whose value is typically pegged to fiat currencies or other claims — signalling a shift from broad prohibition to more specific targeting.

Officials from thirteen government agencies, including judicial and cyberspace regulatory bodies, participated in the enforcement meeting, indicating that anti-crypto efforts are being treated as a coordinated, cross-sector priority. The agencies pledged to intensify monitoring, crack down on underground trading platforms, clamp down on illicit payment flows and coordinate information sharing across law enforcement and regulatory bodies.

The renewed clampdown comes even as some on-the-ground activity suggests partial revival of mining in certain energy-rich provinces, driven by low electricity costs and data-centre growth. Reports indicate that a segment of cryptocurrency miners have quietly restarted operations despite the 2021 ban, suggesting enforcement may be uneven across China’s vast terrain.

Regulators framed the move as necessary to safeguard financial and economic stability, citing recent upticks in speculation, fraud and illegal cross-border capital flows linked to virtual currencies. The articulation of fresh enforcement measures and explicit inclusion of stablecoins reflects a shift in China’s regulatory approach — from discouragement to active suppression.

Given the global ripple effects of China’s policy, observers expect tightening enforcement to influence not only domestic underground markets but also international crypto platforms, stablecoin issuers and cross-border payment flows that might involve Chinese users or capital.

Bahrain-based alternative investment firm Investcorp has agreed to sell its majority stake in the European fintech firm Shine to cloud-software group Cegid, marking the end of an eight-year partnership. The deal will be executed via Investcorp Technology Partners and comes nearly a decade after Investcorp first backed the Danish fintech, then known as Ageras. Financial terms remain undisclosed, and the sale awaits customary regulatory clearances.

Shine, headquartered in Copenhagen, operates across multiple European markets including France, the DACH region, the Netherlands and Denmark. The platform provides a broad suite of services for small and medium-sized businesses — covering business formation, digital banking, invoicing, accounting, and payroll. Under Investcorp’s stewardship, it expanded its reach and grew recurring revenues more than ten-fold, while completing nine acquisitions in its core regions.

Cegid — majority-owned by private equity firm Silver Lake — aims to integrate Shine into its Small Business division, positioning the combined entity as a pan-European “financial copilot” for SMEs and accountants. The merged platform is being designed to offer a unified, cloud-native, AI-driven ecosystem combining e-invoicing, accounting, business banking, payments, payroll, HR and tax compliance. The target user base across Europe is estimated at over one million SMBs and 15,000 accounting professionals.

Reflecting on the sale, Investcorp’s Head of Technology Partners and Chairman of Shine, Gilbert Kamieniecky, said the firm is proud of having supported Shine’s evolution “from a start-up with only a few million in revenue into a European leader and unicorn.” Shine’s co-founders, Rico Andersen and Martin Hegelund, expressed optimism about the next phase under Cegid, emphasising their ambition to deliver more advanced, scalable financial infrastructure to businesses across Europe.

For Cegid, adding Shine strengthens its footprint across key European markets and significantly boosts its SMB customer base, offering opportunities to deploy embedded finance solutions and streamline compliance workflows ahead of evolving e-invoicing and digital reporting mandates across the continent. The integration of Shine’s scalable technology stack with Cegid’s existing cloud and AI infrastructure underscores a strategic bet on digital transformation in SME finance and accounting.

JPMorgan Chase & Co has upgraded its recommendation on China’s stock market to “overweight,” arguing that potential gains in the coming year now outweigh the risks of sharp losses. Strategists at the firm, including Rajiv Batra, explained that China’s market has already surrendered much of its outperformance this year, creating what they describe as an attractive entry point. They highlighted a combination of factors poised to support equities — widespread adoption of artificial intelligence, renewed consumption measures, and expectations of governance reforms. The performance setback appears to have reset valuations and left positioning relatively light, paving the way for what JPMorgan analysts see as potentially strong upside ahead.

The shift follows a quarter in which the MSCI China Index dropped around 6.2 percent even as broader regional indices in Asia-Pacific posted modest gains. JPMorgan noted that the Chinese equity market remains in the early stages of recovering from a downcycle that began in late 2020. With valuations now seen as acceptable and investor sentiment subdued, the bank anticipates room for rally once supportive catalysts take hold.

Analysts argue that companies tied to technology and AI stand to benefit most from upcoming tailwinds. Firms previously weighed under regulatory and macroeconomic uncertainty may now attract renewed investor interest, especially where corporate governance improvements and capital discipline have strengthened balance sheets. Entities with exposure to domestic consumption, industrial automation, electric vehicles, and energy storage are viewed as especially well positioned.

Some investors remain cautious, citing lingering macroeconomic headwinds, weak property prices, deflationary pressures and subdued consumer sentiment that have dampened retail participation in equity markets. But for long-term investors with a willingness to absorb volatility, JPMorgan’s call marks a turning point: the market’s immediate downside appears limited while its upside — if China’s growth impulses and structural reforms materialise — could be substantial.

JPMorgan also sees potential gains for Asian equities more broadly. With China, Hong Kong, South Korea and India judged as overweight, and Taiwan as neutral, the bank expects the MSCI Asia ex-Japan Index could rise roughly 15 percent from current levels if global liquidity remains supportive. Regional equities, they argue, may benefit from a reorientation of capital flows away from developed markets towards Asia’s current valuations.

At the same time, the bank’s optimism contrasts with more cautious forecasts from some rivals, which warn earnings uncertainty and high valuations could trigger consolidation rather than a sustained rally. That divergence underscores the highly bifurcated nature of the market: selective positioning may offer rewards, but indiscriminate exposure could remain risky.

Stellar’s native token XLM jumped above $0.25 as U. S. Bank embarked on a pilot to issue a bank-grade stablecoin on the public Stellar blockchain. That move marks a notable shift for legacy finance, signalling growing institutional comfort with blockchain rails offering compliance, speed and programmability.

U. S. Bank, the fifth-largest commercial bank in the United States, is working in partnership with advisory firm PwC and the Stellar Development Foundation to test issuance of a custom stablecoin using the Stellar network. The pilot aims to evaluate whether a traditional bank can leverage a public blockchain for regulated payments by utilising Stellar’s ability to freeze assets and reverse transactions — features deemed essential for regulatory compliance and customer protection. According to a bank executive, those built-in safeguards helped make the network an attractive choice for a stablecoin pilot.

This institutional endorsement of Stellar coincides with the network’s ongoing development push. A major upgrade code-named Protocol X-Ray is slated for rollout in early 2026. The upgrade will support zero-knowledge applications, giving institutions optional privacy tools for confidential transfers while retaining blockchain auditability — a balance likely to appeal to regulated financial players concerned with compliance and confidentiality.

On-chain metrics suggest the network’s fundamentals are strengthening. Total value locked on Stellar’s smart-contract layer has climbed substantially this year, while transaction volume of stablecoins on the chain — including $AUDD, a prominent fiat-pegged token — has surpassed the $1 billion mark. Observers point out that this surge reflects genuine usage by businesses and institutions rather than speculative activity.

The market has reacted positively. XLM recorded a 2.6 percent uptick, rising from around $0.244 to $0.2505 over 24 hours, with trading volume surging about 45 percent above the daily average. That breakout cleared a key technical resistance near $0.246 and pushed the token past the psychologically significant $0.25 level, renewing optimism among investors who follow price action closely.

While the stablecoin pilot at U. S. Bank remains at an exploratory stage, the partnership underscores a broader shift in the financial sector toward embracing tokenised assets under regulatory guardrails. If the trial succeeds, other banks may follow, potentially driving further demand for blockchain platforms that combine compliance, efficiency and transparency.